Technical variability and safety of sleeve gastrectomy: a nationwide survey of bariatric centers in Poland.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques Pub Date : 2025-05-28 eCollection Date: 2025-07-08 DOI:10.20452/wiitm.2025.17954
Przemysław Sroczyńsk, Piotr Major, Michał R Janik
{"title":"Technical variability and safety of sleeve gastrectomy: a nationwide survey of bariatric centers in Poland.","authors":"Przemysław Sroczyńsk, Piotr Major, Michał R Janik","doi":"10.20452/wiitm.2025.17954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most frequently performed bariatric procedure in Poland. While considered technically straightforward, significant variation exists in the operative technique, which may affect safety outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the technical aspects and complication rates of SG across Polish bariatric centers in 2023.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of a nationwide survey conducted among bariatric centers affiliated with the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Chapter of the Association of Polish Surgeons. As many as 54 centers participated, reporting detailed data on SG technique and outcomes. The centers were stratified by annual SG volume using a 50-procedure threshold, corresponding to the suggested learning curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7450 SG procedures were reported. Calibration bougies of 36 French were used by 70% of the centers. Staple line reinforcement was routinely performed in 72.5% of the centers, with oversewing and clipping as the most common methods. Leak tests were performed by 84.3% of the centers, while 66.7% omitted routine drain placement. Postoperative complication rates included bleeding (0.98%), leak (0.33%), reoperation (1.04%), and mortality (0.16%). Although not significant, complication rates were consistently higher in the centers performing fewer than 50 SGs annually.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SG in Poland is characterized by favorable safety outcomes but notable procedural variability. While most centers follow recommended practices, a lack of standardization persists in key technical areas. Surgical volume may influence complication rates. National guidelines and structured training programs may help harmonize practice and improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49361,"journal":{"name":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","volume":"20 2","pages":"209-214"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12329552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20452/wiitm.2025.17954","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most frequently performed bariatric procedure in Poland. While considered technically straightforward, significant variation exists in the operative technique, which may affect safety outcomes.

Aim: This study aimed to analyze the technical aspects and complication rates of SG across Polish bariatric centers in 2023.

Materials and methods: This is a secondary analysis of a nationwide survey conducted among bariatric centers affiliated with the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Chapter of the Association of Polish Surgeons. As many as 54 centers participated, reporting detailed data on SG technique and outcomes. The centers were stratified by annual SG volume using a 50-procedure threshold, corresponding to the suggested learning curve.

Results: A total of 7450 SG procedures were reported. Calibration bougies of 36 French were used by 70% of the centers. Staple line reinforcement was routinely performed in 72.5% of the centers, with oversewing and clipping as the most common methods. Leak tests were performed by 84.3% of the centers, while 66.7% omitted routine drain placement. Postoperative complication rates included bleeding (0.98%), leak (0.33%), reoperation (1.04%), and mortality (0.16%). Although not significant, complication rates were consistently higher in the centers performing fewer than 50 SGs annually.

Conclusions: SG in Poland is characterized by favorable safety outcomes but notable procedural variability. While most centers follow recommended practices, a lack of standardization persists in key technical areas. Surgical volume may influence complication rates. National guidelines and structured training programs may help harmonize practice and improve outcomes.

袖式胃切除术的技术变异性和安全性:波兰减肥中心的一项全国性调查。
简介:袖式胃切除术(SG)是波兰最常见的减肥手术。虽然在技术上被认为是简单的,但在手术技术上存在很大的差异,可能会影响安全结果。目的:本研究旨在分析2023年波兰减肥中心SG的技术方面和并发症发生率。材料和方法:这是对波兰外科医生协会代谢和减肥外科分会附属减肥中心进行的全国性调查的二次分析。多达54个中心参与,报告了SG技术和结果的详细数据。根据建议的学习曲线,使用50个程序阈值按年SG量对中心进行分层。结果:共报道了7450例SG手术。70%的中心使用了36个法国人的校准棒。72.5%的中心常规进行订书钉线加固,其中最常见的方法是包缝和夹缝。84.3%的中心进行了泄漏检测,而66.7%的中心省略了常规排水管放置。术后并发症发生率为出血(0.98%)、渗漏(0.33%)、再手术(1.04%)、死亡率(0.16%)。虽然不显著,但并发症发生率在每年进行少于50次SGs的中心始终较高。结论:在波兰SG的特点是良好的安全结果,但显着的程序可变性。虽然大多数中心遵循推荐的做法,但在关键技术领域仍然缺乏标准化。手术量可能影响并发症发生率。国家指导方针和有组织的培训计划可能有助于协调实践和改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
23.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques serves as a forum for exchange of multidisciplinary experiences in fields such as: surgery, gynaecology, urology, gastroenterology, neurosurgery, ENT surgery, cardiac surgery, anaesthesiology and radiology, as well as other branches of medicine dealing with miniinvasive techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书