Impact of video -based incentive on patient willingness to read the informed consent form with comprehension before minimally-invasive surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques Pub Date : 2025-06-05 eCollection Date: 2025-07-08 DOI:10.20452/wiitm.2025.17957
Weronika Kisielewska, Michał Kościołek, Kryspin Mitura, Laura Kacprzak, Małgorzata Pajer, Krystian Kisielewski, Bernard Mitura, Weronika Kowalczyk
{"title":"Impact of video -based incentive on patient willingness to read the informed consent form with comprehension before minimally-invasive surgery: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Weronika Kisielewska, Michał Kościołek, Kryspin Mitura, Laura Kacprzak, Małgorzata Pajer, Krystian Kisielewski, Bernard Mitura, Weronika Kowalczyk","doi":"10.20452/wiitm.2025.17957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of the informed consent (IC) form is to enable patients to make a conscious choice based on complete and comprehensible information about a planned surgical procedure, its risks, benefits, and alternative treatment methods. Obtaining information about other therapeutic options is particularly important in the case of laparoscopic surgeries which are becoming increasingly popular. Unfortunately, as the literature indicates, most patients do not read the IC form.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of video material on encouraging patients to thoroughly read the IC form.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This parallel design study comprised 102 patients referred for elective laparoscopic surgical procedures. The participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The block randomization consisted of alternating, weekly assignment of patients to the intervention (video) group and the control group. Anxiety levels were evaluated using a translated version of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients in the video group were more likely to read the entire IC form (83.67%) than those in the control group (33.96%; P = 0.003). However, according to the APAIS scale, reading the IC form had no impact on the level of anxiety (P = 0.72) and information demand (P = 0.9). The most frequently given reason for not reading the IC form was its excessive length (32.61% of the responses).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Video materials demonstrate a remarkable potential in enhancing the awareness of the IC process importance and should be increasingly implemented into everyday medical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":49361,"journal":{"name":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","volume":"20 2","pages":"144-151"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12329670/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20452/wiitm.2025.17957","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of the informed consent (IC) form is to enable patients to make a conscious choice based on complete and comprehensible information about a planned surgical procedure, its risks, benefits, and alternative treatment methods. Obtaining information about other therapeutic options is particularly important in the case of laparoscopic surgeries which are becoming increasingly popular. Unfortunately, as the literature indicates, most patients do not read the IC form.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of video material on encouraging patients to thoroughly read the IC form.

Materials and methods: This parallel design study comprised 102 patients referred for elective laparoscopic surgical procedures. The participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The block randomization consisted of alternating, weekly assignment of patients to the intervention (video) group and the control group. Anxiety levels were evaluated using a translated version of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS).

Results: The patients in the video group were more likely to read the entire IC form (83.67%) than those in the control group (33.96%; P = 0.003). However, according to the APAIS scale, reading the IC form had no impact on the level of anxiety (P = 0.72) and information demand (P = 0.9). The most frequently given reason for not reading the IC form was its excessive length (32.61% of the responses).

Conclusions: Video materials demonstrate a remarkable potential in enhancing the awareness of the IC process importance and should be increasingly implemented into everyday medical practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

视频激励对微创手术前患者理解阅读知情同意书意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验。
前言:知情同意书(IC)的目的是使患者能够在完整和可理解的信息基础上做出有意识的选择,了解计划的外科手术,其风险,益处和替代治疗方法。在腹腔镜手术日益流行的情况下,获取有关其他治疗选择的信息尤为重要。不幸的是,正如文献所示,大多数患者不阅读IC表格。目的:本研究的目的是评估视频材料对鼓励患者彻底阅读IC表格的影响。材料和方法:本平行设计研究纳入102例择期腹腔镜手术患者。参与者按1:1的比例随机分配。分组随机化包括每周将患者交替分配到干预(视频)组和对照组。使用翻译版的阿姆斯特丹术前焦虑和信息量表(APAIS)评估焦虑水平。结果:视频组患者阅读完整IC表的可能性(83.67%)高于对照组(33.96%);P = 0.003)。然而,根据APAIS量表,阅读IC表格对焦虑水平(P = 0.72)和信息需求水平(P = 0.9)没有影响。不阅读IC表格的最常见原因是表格太长(32.61%)。结论:视频材料在提高对IC过程重要性的认识方面具有显着的潜力,应越来越多地应用于日常医疗实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
23.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques serves as a forum for exchange of multidisciplinary experiences in fields such as: surgery, gynaecology, urology, gastroenterology, neurosurgery, ENT surgery, cardiac surgery, anaesthesiology and radiology, as well as other branches of medicine dealing with miniinvasive techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信