Stronger isn't always better: Nalmefene in community overdose response and the false promise of quick-fix public health solutions.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Mark C Navin, Lauren R Fink, Travis N Rieder
{"title":"Stronger isn't always better: Nalmefene in community overdose response and the false promise of quick-fix public health solutions.","authors":"Mark C Navin, Lauren R Fink, Travis N Rieder","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The United States is in its third decade of a drug overdose crisis. An important tool for responding to this crisis is the opioid overdose reversal agent, naloxone. However, with hyper-potent opioids like fentanyl present in the drug supply, some have argued for alternative overdose reversal agents such as nalmefene, which has higher opioid receptor affinity and a longer half-life. This reasoning moves too quickly. There is little evidence that adopting nalmefene for community-based overdose response will provide overall benefit, and there are good reasons to expect that it will cause substantial harm. Nalmefene appears to promise a \"magic bullet\" solution to a complicated and terrible problem, but sustainable overdose prevention requires comprehensive improvements to public health infrastructure. The overdose crisis requires attention, effort, and funding more than it needs a novel technological or pharmaceutical intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"145 ","pages":"104945"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104945","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United States is in its third decade of a drug overdose crisis. An important tool for responding to this crisis is the opioid overdose reversal agent, naloxone. However, with hyper-potent opioids like fentanyl present in the drug supply, some have argued for alternative overdose reversal agents such as nalmefene, which has higher opioid receptor affinity and a longer half-life. This reasoning moves too quickly. There is little evidence that adopting nalmefene for community-based overdose response will provide overall benefit, and there are good reasons to expect that it will cause substantial harm. Nalmefene appears to promise a "magic bullet" solution to a complicated and terrible problem, but sustainable overdose prevention requires comprehensive improvements to public health infrastructure. The overdose crisis requires attention, effort, and funding more than it needs a novel technological or pharmaceutical intervention.

更强并不总是更好:纳美芬在社区过量反应和快速修复公共卫生解决方案的虚假承诺。
美国正处于药物过量危机的第三个十年。应对这一危机的一个重要工具是阿片类药物过量逆转剂纳洛酮。然而,由于芬太尼等强效阿片类药物存在于药物供应中,一些人主张使用纳美芬等替代过量逆转剂,因为纳美芬具有更高的阿片类受体亲和力和更长的半衰期。这种推理过于迅速。几乎没有证据表明采用纳美芬用于社区过量反应将提供总体效益,并且有充分的理由预期它将造成实质性损害。纳美芬似乎有望成为解决这一复杂而可怕问题的“灵丹妙药”,但可持续的过量预防需要对公共卫生基础设施进行全面改善。药物过量危机需要的是关注、努力和资金,而不是新技术或药物干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信