Achilles allograft interposition arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal radio-ulnar stump impingement pain.

IF 1.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Joshua William Feldman, Pamela Boekel, Adam Charles Watts
{"title":"Achilles allograft interposition arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal radio-ulnar stump impingement pain.","authors":"Joshua William Feldman, Pamela Boekel, Adam Charles Watts","doi":"10.1177/17585732251365579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proximal radio-ulnar stump impingement (PRUSI) describes a painful condition occurring following radial head loss. Pain occurs due to the proximal radial stump impinging against the ulna. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of a novel interposition arthroplasty method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational consecutive case series study was undertaken from case note review of patients with PRUSI, treated by Achilles allograft interposition arthroplasty. The technique utilised donor Achilles tendons to cushion the proximal radio-ulnar stump articulation. The primary outcome was a change in pain levels. Secondary outcomes included changes in: elbow and forearm range of movement, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), patient satisfaction on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From baseline to six months post intervention, the mean NRS pain score was reduced from 9/10 to 2/10 with a mean difference in NRS pain scores of -7 (95% CI -4, -10; p = 0.004). Mean MEPS increased from 56/100 (s.d. 8) to 91 (s.d. 8), with a mean difference of 35/100 (95% CI 18, 52; p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Achilles tendon allograft arthroplasty represents a safe procedure for treating PRUSI. This IDEAL phase 1 study shows promising results, indicating the need for further trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":"17585732251365579"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732251365579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Proximal radio-ulnar stump impingement (PRUSI) describes a painful condition occurring following radial head loss. Pain occurs due to the proximal radial stump impinging against the ulna. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of a novel interposition arthroplasty method.

Methods: A retrospective observational consecutive case series study was undertaken from case note review of patients with PRUSI, treated by Achilles allograft interposition arthroplasty. The technique utilised donor Achilles tendons to cushion the proximal radio-ulnar stump articulation. The primary outcome was a change in pain levels. Secondary outcomes included changes in: elbow and forearm range of movement, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), patient satisfaction on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) and adverse events.

Results: From baseline to six months post intervention, the mean NRS pain score was reduced from 9/10 to 2/10 with a mean difference in NRS pain scores of -7 (95% CI -4, -10; p = 0.004). Mean MEPS increased from 56/100 (s.d. 8) to 91 (s.d. 8), with a mean difference of 35/100 (95% CI 18, 52; p = 0.005).

Conclusion: Achilles tendon allograft arthroplasty represents a safe procedure for treating PRUSI. This IDEAL phase 1 study shows promising results, indicating the need for further trials.

同种异体跟腱间置置换术治疗桡尺端残端撞击痛。
背景:近端桡尺残端撞击(PRUSI)描述了桡骨头丢失后发生的疼痛状况。疼痛是由于桡骨残端近端撞击尺骨引起的。本研究旨在评估一种新型介入关节置换术的安全性。方法:回顾性观察连续的病例系列研究,从病例记录回顾的PRUSI患者,治疗阿基里斯异体移植关节置换术。该技术利用供体跟腱缓冲近端桡尺残端关节。主要结果是疼痛程度的改变。次要结果包括肘部和前臂活动范围的变化,梅奥肘部表现评分(MEPS),患者对11分数值评定量表(NRS)的满意度和不良事件。结果:从基线到干预后6个月,平均NRS疼痛评分从9/10降至2/10,NRS疼痛评分的平均差异为-7 (95% CI为-4,-10;p = 0.004)。平均MEPS从56/100 (sd 8)增加到91 (sd 8),平均差异为35/100 (95% CI 18,52;p = 0.005)。结论:同种异体跟腱关节置换术是治疗先天性跟腱损伤的安全方法。IDEAL的1期研究显示了令人鼓舞的结果,表明需要进一步的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Shoulder and Elbow
Shoulder and Elbow Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信