[Construction and application of a standard operating procedure for urinary incontinence management in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy].

Abstract

Objective: To explore the effect of evidence-based standardized procedures (SOP) on urinary incontinence management in patients with radical prostatectomy.

Methods: Sixty-three patients who underwent radical prostatectomy from October 2022 to September 2023 were included in the control group. And 63 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy from October 2023 to September 2024 were included in the observation group. The patients in the control group received routine perioperative care. As an addition, the SOP on urinary incontinence management was performed in the patients of observation group. The incidence of urinary incontinence, severity of urinary incontinence (1h urine pad test), quality of life (Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire) and comfort level (General Comfort Question) of the two groups were compared after 3 and 6 months of surgery.

Results: The incidence of urinary incontinence at 3 and 6 months after operation in the observation group was 36.51% and 19.05%, respectively, which were lower than those (53.97% and 38.10%) of the control group, respectively. And the incidence rates of the two groups decreased significantly (P<0.05).The score of life quality after 3 months of operation was (56.17±12.75) in the control group, which was lower than that (70.41±14.50) of the observation group. The 3-month postoperative comfort score was (52.73±11.26) in the control group and (63.49±13.52) in the observation group. The 6-month postoperative incontinence quality of life score was (64.70±11.38) in the control group and (85.41±12.04) in the observation group. And the 6-month postoperative comfort score was (60.96±8.04) in the control group and (83.49±12.04) in the observation group. The quality of life and comfort scores of the two groups 6 months after operation were significantly improved than those 3 months after operation, and the improvement of the observation group was more obvious than that of the control group (P<0.05). There were significant differences in the degree of urinary incontinence between the two groups at 3 months and 6 months after operation (P<0.05).

Conclusion: SOP management for the patients underwent radical prostatectomy can be an effective method for reducing the incidence of postoperative urinary incontinence, which promotes the recovery of postoperative urinary control.