Continuous Low-dose Epidural Morphine and Ketamine Analgesia Improves Quality of Recovery after Major Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

IF 0.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Sailaja Karri, Ramamani Mariappan, Gandham Edmond Jonathan, Thenmozhi Mani, Prasadkanna Prabhakar, Jemimah Samuel, Krishnaprabhu Raju
{"title":"Continuous Low-dose Epidural Morphine and Ketamine Analgesia Improves Quality of Recovery after Major Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial.","authors":"Sailaja Karri, Ramamani Mariappan, Gandham Edmond Jonathan, Thenmozhi Mani, Prasadkanna Prabhakar, Jemimah Samuel, Krishnaprabhu Raju","doi":"10.4274/TJAR.2025.251950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The effect of postoperative analgesia on the quality of recovery (QoR) after major lumbar spine surgery is understudied. We hypothesized that continuous epidural morphine and ketamine administration would provide effective analgesia, thereby improving QoR compared to continuous intravenous morphine and ketamine using the QoR-15 questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 40 patients were randomised to receive either continuous low-dose epidural morphine and ketamine via an intraoperatively placed epidural catheter (Group A) or intravenous morphine and ketamine using a patient-controlled analgesia system (Group B) for 48 hours. All patients were anaesthetized using standard anaesthesia drugs. The primary outcome was QoR at 24 and 48 hours after surgery using the QoR-15 questionnaire. The secondary outcomes were pain score at various time points during the first 48 hours, rescue analgesic requirements, ambulation time, length of hospital stay, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients were recruited (20 in each group), and all patient data were included in the analysis. The total QoR-15 scores for Group A and Group B at 24 hours were 134.8±6.65 and 128.9±6.12, respectively (P=0.006). The QoR-15 scores at 48 hours for groups A and B were 136.7±6.02 vs 132.10±6.8 (P=0.029), respectively. The pain score was lower in Group A than in Group B at rest and during movement, with P=0.015 and 0.001, respectively, and all the other secondary outcomes were comparable between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Postoperative analgesia with continuous low-dose epidural morphine and ketamine via an intraoperatively placed epidural catheter provides superior QoR after major lumbar spine surgery as compared to intravenous morphine and ketamine.</p>","PeriodicalId":23353,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2025.251950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The effect of postoperative analgesia on the quality of recovery (QoR) after major lumbar spine surgery is understudied. We hypothesized that continuous epidural morphine and ketamine administration would provide effective analgesia, thereby improving QoR compared to continuous intravenous morphine and ketamine using the QoR-15 questionnaire.

Methods: A total of 40 patients were randomised to receive either continuous low-dose epidural morphine and ketamine via an intraoperatively placed epidural catheter (Group A) or intravenous morphine and ketamine using a patient-controlled analgesia system (Group B) for 48 hours. All patients were anaesthetized using standard anaesthesia drugs. The primary outcome was QoR at 24 and 48 hours after surgery using the QoR-15 questionnaire. The secondary outcomes were pain score at various time points during the first 48 hours, rescue analgesic requirements, ambulation time, length of hospital stay, and patient satisfaction.

Results: Forty patients were recruited (20 in each group), and all patient data were included in the analysis. The total QoR-15 scores for Group A and Group B at 24 hours were 134.8±6.65 and 128.9±6.12, respectively (P=0.006). The QoR-15 scores at 48 hours for groups A and B were 136.7±6.02 vs 132.10±6.8 (P=0.029), respectively. The pain score was lower in Group A than in Group B at rest and during movement, with P=0.015 and 0.001, respectively, and all the other secondary outcomes were comparable between the groups.

Conclusion: Postoperative analgesia with continuous low-dose epidural morphine and ketamine via an intraoperatively placed epidural catheter provides superior QoR after major lumbar spine surgery as compared to intravenous morphine and ketamine.

持续低剂量硬膜外吗啡和氯胺酮镇痛提高腰椎大手术后恢复质量:一项随机对照试验。
目的:探讨术后镇痛对腰椎大手术后恢复质量的影响。通过QoR-15问卷,我们假设连续硬膜外吗啡和氯胺酮政府将提供有效的镇痛,从而比连续静脉注射吗啡和氯胺酮提高QoR。方法:共40例患者随机分为两组,一组通过术中置入硬膜外导管连续接受低剂量硬膜外吗啡和氯胺酮(A组),另一组使用患者自控镇痛系统静脉注射吗啡和氯胺酮(B组),持续48小时。所有患者均采用标准麻醉药物麻醉。使用QoR-15问卷,主要结局是术后24小时和48小时的QoR。次要结果为前48小时各时间点疼痛评分、抢救镇痛需求、下床时间、住院时间和患者满意度。结果:共纳入患者40例(每组20例),所有患者资料均纳入分析。A组和B组24 h QoR-15总分分别为134.8±6.65和128.9±6.12 (P=0.006)。A组和B组48 h QoR-15评分分别为136.7±6.02分和132.10±6.8分(P=0.029)。A组静止和运动时疼痛评分均低于B组,P值分别为0.015和0.001,其他次要指标组间具有可比性。结论:与静脉注射吗啡和氯胺酮相比,术中置入硬膜外导管持续低剂量硬膜外吗啡和氯胺酮在腰椎大手术后的QoR更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信