Effects of intravenous lidocaine on propofol-based sedation in adult patients during gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111960
Pasquale Rinaldi, Andrea Galderisi, Elena Maria Lamacchia, Marta Di Folco, Alessandro Strumia, Fedra Lavorante, Alessia Mattei, Lorenzo Schiavoni, Giuseppe Pascarella, Rita Cataldo, Massimiliano Carassiti, Felice Eugenio Agrò, Maria Luisa Garo
{"title":"Effects of intravenous lidocaine on propofol-based sedation in adult patients during gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Pasquale Rinaldi, Andrea Galderisi, Elena Maria Lamacchia, Marta Di Folco, Alessandro Strumia, Fedra Lavorante, Alessia Mattei, Lorenzo Schiavoni, Giuseppe Pascarella, Rita Cataldo, Massimiliano Carassiti, Felice Eugenio Agrò, Maria Luisa Garo","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sedation during endoscopic gastrointestinal procedures is now a routine practise that can improve patient outcomes. Propofol is one of the most commonly used intravenous anaesthetics. However, despite its popularity, it has been associated with various side effects, particularly haemodynamic and respiratory complications, especially in frail patient populations. Intravenous (IV) lidocaine, used as an adjuvant, has already demonstrated its efficacy in improving certain outcomes during sedation with propofol. However, the emergence of further studies requires an update to enhance the quality of existing data and refine this anaesthetic practise. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous lidocaine in reducing propofol consumption, decreasing episodes of desaturation and involuntary movements during the procedure, improving awakening time, relieving post-procedure pain, and increasing endoscopist satisfaction during propofol sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures (PROSPERO registration: CRD420250651511).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included randomised controlled trials conducted in adult patients undergoing propofol sedation with IV lidocaine administered as an adjunct during gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. A comprehensive systematic search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science from January to February 2025 without language or time restrictions. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen randomised controlled trials (1698 patients) were selected based on full text and included in the study. Lower propofol consumption was observed with intravenous lidocaine compared with the control group (SMD: -1.36, 95 % CI: -1.67 to -1.05; p < 0.001), with consistent results in all subgroups. Awakening time was significantly shorter in the IV lidocaine group (SMD = -0.92 [95 % CI: -1.18 to -0.66]; p < 0.001), while no significant difference was observed in full recovery time. Lidocaine administration was associated with a 59 % reduction in desaturation events, 36 % reduction in hypotension events and a 57 % reduction in involuntary movements. Continuous infusion after bolus administration was required to achieve these effects. Infusion rates of 2 mg/kg/h and 4 mg/kg/h were equally effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intravenous lidocaine is a safe and effective adjunct to propofol sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy, reducing anaesthetic requirements and sedation-related complications. Routine use of lidocaine may increase the safety of the procedure, especially in high-risk populations and complex procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"106 ","pages":"111960"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111960","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Sedation during endoscopic gastrointestinal procedures is now a routine practise that can improve patient outcomes. Propofol is one of the most commonly used intravenous anaesthetics. However, despite its popularity, it has been associated with various side effects, particularly haemodynamic and respiratory complications, especially in frail patient populations. Intravenous (IV) lidocaine, used as an adjuvant, has already demonstrated its efficacy in improving certain outcomes during sedation with propofol. However, the emergence of further studies requires an update to enhance the quality of existing data and refine this anaesthetic practise. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous lidocaine in reducing propofol consumption, decreasing episodes of desaturation and involuntary movements during the procedure, improving awakening time, relieving post-procedure pain, and increasing endoscopist satisfaction during propofol sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures (PROSPERO registration: CRD420250651511).

Methods: We included randomised controlled trials conducted in adult patients undergoing propofol sedation with IV lidocaine administered as an adjunct during gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. A comprehensive systematic search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science from January to February 2025 without language or time restrictions. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB2).

Results: Seventeen randomised controlled trials (1698 patients) were selected based on full text and included in the study. Lower propofol consumption was observed with intravenous lidocaine compared with the control group (SMD: -1.36, 95 % CI: -1.67 to -1.05; p < 0.001), with consistent results in all subgroups. Awakening time was significantly shorter in the IV lidocaine group (SMD = -0.92 [95 % CI: -1.18 to -0.66]; p < 0.001), while no significant difference was observed in full recovery time. Lidocaine administration was associated with a 59 % reduction in desaturation events, 36 % reduction in hypotension events and a 57 % reduction in involuntary movements. Continuous infusion after bolus administration was required to achieve these effects. Infusion rates of 2 mg/kg/h and 4 mg/kg/h were equally effective.

Conclusion: Intravenous lidocaine is a safe and effective adjunct to propofol sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy, reducing anaesthetic requirements and sedation-related complications. Routine use of lidocaine may increase the safety of the procedure, especially in high-risk populations and complex procedures.

胃肠内镜手术期间成人患者静脉注射利多卡因对异丙酚镇静的影响:一项最新的系统综述和荟萃分析。
在内镜胃肠道手术中镇静现在是一种常规做法,可以改善患者的预后。异丙酚是最常用的静脉麻醉剂之一。然而,尽管它很受欢迎,但它有各种副作用,特别是血液动力学和呼吸系统并发症,特别是在虚弱的患者群体中。静脉注射(IV)利多卡因作为辅助剂,已经证明其在异丙酚镇静期间改善某些结果的有效性。然而,进一步研究的出现需要更新以提高现有数据的质量并改进这种麻醉实践。本系统综述和meta分析的目的是评估静脉注射利多卡因在减少异丙酚消耗、减少手术过程中失饱和和不自主运动发作、改善唤醒时间、缓解术后疼痛和提高胃肠内镜手术中异丙酚镇静期间内窥镜医师满意度方面的疗效(PROSPERO注册:CRD420250651511)。方法:我们纳入了在胃肠内窥镜手术期间接受异丙酚镇静并静脉注射利多卡因作为辅助的成年患者的随机对照试验。我们于2025年1 - 2月在PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus和Web of Science中进行了全面的系统检索,没有语言和时间限制。使用Cochrane风险偏倚工具(RoB2)评估偏倚风险。结果:根据全文选择17个随机对照试验(1698例患者)纳入研究。与对照组相比,静脉注射利多卡因组丙泊酚消耗量更低(SMD: -1.36, 95% CI: -1.67 ~ -1.05;结论:静脉利多卡因是胃肠内镜下异丙酚镇静的安全有效辅助,可减少麻醉需求和镇静相关并发症。常规使用利多卡因可增加手术的安全性,特别是在高危人群和复杂的手术中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信