Effective real-world outcomes of remdesivir provided under compassionate access for moderate/severe COVID-19 in Australia.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Robert Stolz, Alice Liu, Jonathan Darby, Marion Kainer, Stephen Guy, Leong Shuen Loo, Craig Aboltins, Pann Ei Wynn, Patrick G P Charles, Kumar Visvanathan, Peter Kelley, Tony Korman, Nicole Gilroy, Joe Sasadeusz
{"title":"Effective real-world outcomes of remdesivir provided under compassionate access for moderate/severe COVID-19 in Australia.","authors":"Robert Stolz, Alice Liu, Jonathan Darby, Marion Kainer, Stephen Guy, Leong Shuen Loo, Craig Aboltins, Pann Ei Wynn, Patrick G P Charles, Kumar Visvanathan, Peter Kelley, Tony Korman, Nicole Gilroy, Joe Sasadeusz","doi":"10.1111/imj.70173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remdesivir is a nucleotide analogue with in vitro activity against SARS-COV-2. Clinical trial data from the ACTT-1 randomised clinical trial demonstrated improved time to clinical recovery. The effectiveness and safety in a real world setting in Australia are unknown.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate real-world clinical outcomes in an Australian setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review in a tertiary care setting of patients who received remdesivir under compassionate access in 10 Australian hospitals between July and December 2020. The primary outcome was time to recovery, as defined on an ordinal scale by discharge or hospitalisation no longer requiring any acute medical care. Secondary outcomes including 28-day mortality were also measured and compared to data from ACTT-1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were collected on 220 patients. The average age was 61 years (range 23-96); 76 (34%) patients had diabetes, 45 (20%) had pre-existing lung disease, and 21 (9%) were immunosuppressed; 214 (96%) patients were hypoxic at any point during the admission, and 51 (22%) patients required mechanical ventilation. Mean duration of symptoms to commencement of remdesivir was 7 days (range 0-14), while 213 (95%) received glucocorticoids. Median time to improvement on remdesivir was 4 days, compared to 7 days in patients receiving remdesivir in ACTT-1. The 28-day mortality was 9%, compared to 11% in ACTT-1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical recovery and mortality with remdesivir in a real-world setting were at least comparable to randomised clinical trial data, confirming effectiveness in this setting. Use of adjunctive glucocorticoids in this cohort likely contributed to the improved outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70173","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Remdesivir is a nucleotide analogue with in vitro activity against SARS-COV-2. Clinical trial data from the ACTT-1 randomised clinical trial demonstrated improved time to clinical recovery. The effectiveness and safety in a real world setting in Australia are unknown.

Aim: To evaluate real-world clinical outcomes in an Australian setting.

Methods: Retrospective chart review in a tertiary care setting of patients who received remdesivir under compassionate access in 10 Australian hospitals between July and December 2020. The primary outcome was time to recovery, as defined on an ordinal scale by discharge or hospitalisation no longer requiring any acute medical care. Secondary outcomes including 28-day mortality were also measured and compared to data from ACTT-1.

Results: Data were collected on 220 patients. The average age was 61 years (range 23-96); 76 (34%) patients had diabetes, 45 (20%) had pre-existing lung disease, and 21 (9%) were immunosuppressed; 214 (96%) patients were hypoxic at any point during the admission, and 51 (22%) patients required mechanical ventilation. Mean duration of symptoms to commencement of remdesivir was 7 days (range 0-14), while 213 (95%) received glucocorticoids. Median time to improvement on remdesivir was 4 days, compared to 7 days in patients receiving remdesivir in ACTT-1. The 28-day mortality was 9%, compared to 11% in ACTT-1.

Conclusion: Clinical recovery and mortality with remdesivir in a real-world setting were at least comparable to randomised clinical trial data, confirming effectiveness in this setting. Use of adjunctive glucocorticoids in this cohort likely contributed to the improved outcomes.

在澳大利亚,瑞德西韦在同情获取下为中/重度COVID-19提供了有效的现实结果。
背景:Remdesivir是一种核苷酸类似物,具有体外抗SARS-COV-2活性。来自ACTT-1随机临床试验的临床试验数据表明,临床恢复时间缩短。在澳大利亚的现实环境中,其有效性和安全性尚不清楚。目的:评估真实世界的临床结果在澳大利亚设置。方法:对2020年7月至12月期间在澳大利亚10家医院接受瑞德西韦关爱访问的三级医疗机构患者的回顾性图表进行回顾。主要结果是恢复时间,按照出院或住院不再需要任何急性医疗护理的顺序来定义。次要结局包括28天死亡率也被测量,并与ACTT-1的数据进行比较。结果:收集220例患者资料。平均年龄61岁(23 ~ 96岁);76例(34%)患者患有糖尿病,45例(20%)患者先前存在肺部疾病,21例(9%)患者免疫抑制;214例(96%)患者在入院时出现缺氧,51例(22%)患者需要机械通气。症状到开始使用瑞德西韦的平均持续时间为7天(范围0-14天),而213例(95%)接受糖皮质激素治疗。瑞德西韦治疗改善的中位时间为4天,而在ACTT-1治疗中接受瑞德西韦治疗的患者为7天。28天死亡率为9%,而ACTT-1组为11%。结论:瑞德西韦在现实环境中的临床恢复和死亡率至少与随机临床试验数据相当,证实了这种情况下的有效性。在这个队列中使用辅助糖皮质激素可能有助于改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信