Anna Mishina, Kirill Zhudenkov, Gabriel Helmlinger, Kirill Peskov
{"title":"A Systematic Comparative Analysis of Tumor Size Models Based on Erlotinib Clinical Data in Advanced NSCLC.","authors":"Anna Mishina, Kirill Zhudenkov, Gabriel Helmlinger, Kirill Peskov","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early assessment of efficacy and dose optimization remain critical challenges in the development of anticancer therapies. Empirical models of solid tumor size dynamics-a key prognostic biomarker-have played a central role in addressing these challenges. However, a systematic comparison of commonly used tumor size models, in terms of descriptive and predictive performance as well as generalizability within a population framework, has not been conducted to date. The present research sought to develop a methodological framework for the optimization of tumor models, offering a basis for more accurate predictions of tumor dynamics. The corresponding modeling workflow was practically tested against clinical data of erlotinib, a treatment administered to patients with advanced NSCLC. Five widely used tumor size models were evaluated, of which only three-the Bi-Exponential (BiExp), the Linear-Exponential (LExp), and Claret's Tumor Growth Inhibition (TGI) model-demonstrated reproducibility of the base model during a repeated cross-validation approach. Among these, the TGI model exhibited superior descriptive and predictive performance. However, a thorough literature search showed that erlotinib clinical data in NSCLC have been analyzed using only the BiExp and LExp models. Furthermore, extrapolation from 3 to 16 months revealed outlier predictions for the BiExp and TGI models, while the LExp model showed higher consistency, suggesting that models utilizing an exponential growth function may have a more limited extrapolation range than those assuming linear growth. Despite a clear ranking of models based on descriptive and predictive performance, no hierarchy emerged with respect to discriminatory ability. All three models showed high accuracy in distinguishing RECIST-based objective responders, while accuracy in predicting the emergence of acquired resistance remained uniformly low. Trial Registration: Clinical trial number: NCT00364351.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.70095","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Early assessment of efficacy and dose optimization remain critical challenges in the development of anticancer therapies. Empirical models of solid tumor size dynamics-a key prognostic biomarker-have played a central role in addressing these challenges. However, a systematic comparison of commonly used tumor size models, in terms of descriptive and predictive performance as well as generalizability within a population framework, has not been conducted to date. The present research sought to develop a methodological framework for the optimization of tumor models, offering a basis for more accurate predictions of tumor dynamics. The corresponding modeling workflow was practically tested against clinical data of erlotinib, a treatment administered to patients with advanced NSCLC. Five widely used tumor size models were evaluated, of which only three-the Bi-Exponential (BiExp), the Linear-Exponential (LExp), and Claret's Tumor Growth Inhibition (TGI) model-demonstrated reproducibility of the base model during a repeated cross-validation approach. Among these, the TGI model exhibited superior descriptive and predictive performance. However, a thorough literature search showed that erlotinib clinical data in NSCLC have been analyzed using only the BiExp and LExp models. Furthermore, extrapolation from 3 to 16 months revealed outlier predictions for the BiExp and TGI models, while the LExp model showed higher consistency, suggesting that models utilizing an exponential growth function may have a more limited extrapolation range than those assuming linear growth. Despite a clear ranking of models based on descriptive and predictive performance, no hierarchy emerged with respect to discriminatory ability. All three models showed high accuracy in distinguishing RECIST-based objective responders, while accuracy in predicting the emergence of acquired resistance remained uniformly low. Trial Registration: Clinical trial number: NCT00364351.