Melissa E. Petersen, Zhengyang Zhou, James R. Hall, Nicole Phillips, Karin L. Meeker, Matthew T. Borzage, Meredith N. Braskie, Alexandra L. Clark, Yonggang Shi, Robert A. Rissman, Fan Zhang, Raul Vintimilla, Antonio Casas, Jill Rhodes, Robert C. Barber, Leigh Johnson, Kristine Yaffe, Arthur W. Toga, Sid E. O'Bryant, for the HABS-HD Study Team
{"title":"Health and Aging Brain Study–Health Disparities (HABS-HD) methods and partner characteristics","authors":"Melissa E. Petersen, Zhengyang Zhou, James R. Hall, Nicole Phillips, Karin L. Meeker, Matthew T. Borzage, Meredith N. Braskie, Alexandra L. Clark, Yonggang Shi, Robert A. Rissman, Fan Zhang, Raul Vintimilla, Antonio Casas, Jill Rhodes, Robert C. Barber, Leigh Johnson, Kristine Yaffe, Arthur W. Toga, Sid E. O'Bryant, for the HABS-HD Study Team","doi":"10.1002/trc2.70140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>The Health and Aging Brain Study–Health Disparities (HABS-HD) is an ongoing prospective study aimed at understanding brain health and aging. The current work provides a description of the cohort baseline characteristics and outlines the study methodology.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed available data from <i>n</i> = 1066 non-Hispanic Black (NHB), <i>n</i> = 1425 Hispanic, and <i>n</i> = 1349 non-Hispanic White (NHW) partners who were actively enrolled in HABS-HD. Descriptive statistics are presented for each racial/ethnic group across demographic, medical, and diagnostic characteristics. Differences in select amyloid (A), tau (T), and neurodegenerative (N) biomarkers spanning proteomic and neuroimaging were examined along with groupwise differences for cognitive test performance and select social determinants of health (SDoH) factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>The characteristics of the cohort revealed significant groupwise differences in age, education, sex, and cognitive diagnosis. Higher rates of cognitive impairment (mild cognitive impairment [MCI] and dementia) were found in NHB and Hispanic compared to NHW partners, despite the latter group being older. There were also higher rates of hypertension and diabetes among NHB and Hispanic compared to NHW partners. Differences were also found across many plasma (A/T[N]) biomarkers and select neuroimaging measures, including meta-region of interest and white matter hyperintensities. Positron emission tomography amyloid positivity rates (but not tau positivity) were found to differ, with higher rates observed among NHW (15% amyloid positivity) compared to NHB (3%) partners. Groups also differed by select SDoH factors, including household income, insurance, having a health-care provider, and Area Deprivation Index. All cognitive measures also revealed groupwise differences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>The baseline cohort characteristics for HABS-HD reveal significant group differences spanning demographic, medical, cognitive, and biological factors (including A/T[N] biomarkers), which are all critical to understand as they relate to aging and age-related diseases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>The Health and Aging Brain Study–Health Disparities (HABS-HD) cohort baseline characteristics and study methodology were provided.</li>\n \n <li>Cohort characteristic differences were found across demographic factors, including age, education, sex, and cognitive diagnosis across the representative groups.</li>\n \n <li>Biomarkers for amyloid/tau/neurodegeneration spanning blood and neuroimaging were shown to differ as well across cohort groups.</li>\n \n <li>Positivity rates for amyloid positron emission tomography were lower for non-Hispanic Black partners in the cohort compared to non-Hispanic White partners.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/trc2.70140","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/trc2.70140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
The Health and Aging Brain Study–Health Disparities (HABS-HD) is an ongoing prospective study aimed at understanding brain health and aging. The current work provides a description of the cohort baseline characteristics and outlines the study methodology.
METHODS
We analyzed available data from n = 1066 non-Hispanic Black (NHB), n = 1425 Hispanic, and n = 1349 non-Hispanic White (NHW) partners who were actively enrolled in HABS-HD. Descriptive statistics are presented for each racial/ethnic group across demographic, medical, and diagnostic characteristics. Differences in select amyloid (A), tau (T), and neurodegenerative (N) biomarkers spanning proteomic and neuroimaging were examined along with groupwise differences for cognitive test performance and select social determinants of health (SDoH) factors.
RESULTS
The characteristics of the cohort revealed significant groupwise differences in age, education, sex, and cognitive diagnosis. Higher rates of cognitive impairment (mild cognitive impairment [MCI] and dementia) were found in NHB and Hispanic compared to NHW partners, despite the latter group being older. There were also higher rates of hypertension and diabetes among NHB and Hispanic compared to NHW partners. Differences were also found across many plasma (A/T[N]) biomarkers and select neuroimaging measures, including meta-region of interest and white matter hyperintensities. Positron emission tomography amyloid positivity rates (but not tau positivity) were found to differ, with higher rates observed among NHW (15% amyloid positivity) compared to NHB (3%) partners. Groups also differed by select SDoH factors, including household income, insurance, having a health-care provider, and Area Deprivation Index. All cognitive measures also revealed groupwise differences.
DISCUSSION
The baseline cohort characteristics for HABS-HD reveal significant group differences spanning demographic, medical, cognitive, and biological factors (including A/T[N] biomarkers), which are all critical to understand as they relate to aging and age-related diseases.
Highlights
The Health and Aging Brain Study–Health Disparities (HABS-HD) cohort baseline characteristics and study methodology were provided.
Cohort characteristic differences were found across demographic factors, including age, education, sex, and cognitive diagnosis across the representative groups.
Biomarkers for amyloid/tau/neurodegeneration spanning blood and neuroimaging were shown to differ as well across cohort groups.
Positivity rates for amyloid positron emission tomography were lower for non-Hispanic Black partners in the cohort compared to non-Hispanic White partners.
期刊介绍:
Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions (TRCI) is a peer-reviewed, open access,journal from the Alzheimer''s Association®. The journal seeks to bridge the full scope of explorations between basic research on drug discovery and clinical studies, validating putative therapies for aging-related chronic brain conditions that affect cognition, motor functions, and other behavioral or clinical symptoms associated with all forms dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish findings from diverse domains of research and disciplines to accelerate the conversion of abstract facts into practical knowledge: specifically, to translate what is learned at the bench into bedside applications. The journal seeks to publish articles that go beyond a singular emphasis on either basic drug discovery research or clinical research. Rather, an important theme of articles will be the linkages between and among the various discrete steps in the complex continuum of therapy development. For rapid communication among a multidisciplinary research audience involving the range of therapeutic interventions, TRCI will consider only original contributions that include feature length research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, brief reports, narrative reviews, commentaries, letters, perspectives, and research news that would advance wide range of interventions to ameliorate symptoms or alter the progression of chronic neurocognitive disorders such as dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish on topics related to medicine, geriatrics, neuroscience, neurophysiology, neurology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, bioinformatics, pharmaco-genetics, regulatory issues, health economics, pharmacoeconomics, and public health policy as these apply to preclinical and clinical research on therapeutics.