The Correlation Between Functional and Morphometric Small Fiber Assessment in Mixed Etiology Polyneuropathy

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Farah A. Ghadban, Charlotte N. Bay-Smidt, Asger Bjørnkær, Laura M. Gaist, Jakob V. Holbech, David Gaist, Martin Wirenfeldt, Søren H. Sindrup, Thomas Krøigård
{"title":"The Correlation Between Functional and Morphometric Small Fiber Assessment in Mixed Etiology Polyneuropathy","authors":"Farah A. Ghadban,&nbsp;Charlotte N. Bay-Smidt,&nbsp;Asger Bjørnkær,&nbsp;Laura M. Gaist,&nbsp;Jakob V. Holbech,&nbsp;David Gaist,&nbsp;Martin Wirenfeldt,&nbsp;Søren H. Sindrup,&nbsp;Thomas Krøigård","doi":"10.1111/jns.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Skin biopsies are the primary diagnostic test for small fiber neuropathy, but recently corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) has been developed as an alternative. We compared the correlations of each of these morphometric assessments with peripheral nerve function evaluated through comprehensive quantitative sensory testing (QST) in a mixed etiology polyneuropathy cohort.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>CCM and skin biopsies were performed in a prospective cohort of unselected patients undergoing polyneuropathy diagnostic work-up. We used predefined criteria to identify patients with small or mixed fiber neuropathy. The correlations between corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), fiber length (CNFL), branch density (CNBD), and tortuosity (CNFT) and the intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) at the distal leg and the results of QST at the foot were determined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Two-hundred and forty-four patients were included in the analysis. CNFD was negligibly correlated with warm detection threshold (WDT) (<i>r</i> = −0.15; <i>p</i> = 0.023), while there was no statistically significant correlation with other QST measures. There were no statistically significant correlations between neither CNFL nor CNBD and any of the QST measures. CNFT correlated negligibly with WDT (<i>r</i> = 0.17; <i>p</i> = 0.008) and vibration detection threshold (VDT) (<i>r</i> = −0.13; <i>p</i> = 0.044). IENFD correlated moderately with WDT (<i>r</i> = −0.33; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) and mechanical pain threshold (<i>r</i> = −0.37; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) and weakly with cold detection threshold (<i>r</i> = 0.21; <i>p</i> = 0.0008), mechanical detection threshold (<i>r</i> = −0.21; <i>p</i> = 0.0008) and VDT (<i>r</i> = 0.23; <i>p</i> = 0.0004).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\n \n <p>IENFD correlated better with small and large fiber function at the foot than CCM measures in patients with mixed etiology polyneuropathy. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess the clinical utility for neuropathy progression.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System","volume":"30 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jns.70051","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jns.70051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Skin biopsies are the primary diagnostic test for small fiber neuropathy, but recently corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) has been developed as an alternative. We compared the correlations of each of these morphometric assessments with peripheral nerve function evaluated through comprehensive quantitative sensory testing (QST) in a mixed etiology polyneuropathy cohort.

Methods

CCM and skin biopsies were performed in a prospective cohort of unselected patients undergoing polyneuropathy diagnostic work-up. We used predefined criteria to identify patients with small or mixed fiber neuropathy. The correlations between corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), fiber length (CNFL), branch density (CNBD), and tortuosity (CNFT) and the intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) at the distal leg and the results of QST at the foot were determined.

Results

Two-hundred and forty-four patients were included in the analysis. CNFD was negligibly correlated with warm detection threshold (WDT) (r = −0.15; p = 0.023), while there was no statistically significant correlation with other QST measures. There were no statistically significant correlations between neither CNFL nor CNBD and any of the QST measures. CNFT correlated negligibly with WDT (r = 0.17; p = 0.008) and vibration detection threshold (VDT) (r = −0.13; p = 0.044). IENFD correlated moderately with WDT (r = −0.33; p < 0.0001) and mechanical pain threshold (r = −0.37; p < 0.0001) and weakly with cold detection threshold (r = 0.21; p = 0.0008), mechanical detection threshold (r = −0.21; p = 0.0008) and VDT (r = 0.23; p = 0.0004).

Interpretation

IENFD correlated better with small and large fiber function at the foot than CCM measures in patients with mixed etiology polyneuropathy. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess the clinical utility for neuropathy progression.

Abstract Image

混合病因多发性神经病变的小纤维功能与形态学评估的相关性
背景和目的皮肤活检是小纤维神经病变的主要诊断方法,但最近角膜共聚焦显微镜(CCM)已发展成为一种替代方法。我们比较了每种形态测量评估与周围神经功能的相关性,通过综合定量感觉测试(QST)在混合病因多发性神经病变队列中评估。方法对未选定的接受多神经病变诊断检查的患者进行CCM和皮肤活检。我们使用预先定义的标准来识别小纤维或混合纤维神经病患者。测定角膜神经纤维密度(CNFD)、纤维长度(CNFL)、分支密度(CNBD)和弯曲度(CNFT)与远端小腿表皮内神经纤维密度(IENFD)和足部QST结果的相关性。结果244例患者纳入分析。CNFD与温暖检测阈值(WDT)的相关性可忽略不计(r = - 0.15;p = 0.023),而与其他QST指标无统计学意义相关。CNFL和CNBD与任何QST测量之间均无统计学显著相关性。CNFT与WDT的相关性可忽略(r = 0.17;p = 0.008)和振动检测阈值(VDT) (r =−0.13;p = 0.044)。IENFD与WDT呈正相关(r = - 0.33;P < 0.0001)和机械痛阈(r = - 0.37;P < 0.0001),与冷检测阈值关系弱(r = 0.21;P = 0.0008),机械检测阈值(r =−0.21;p = 0.0008)和VDT (r = 0.23;p = 0.0004)。解释在混合病因多发性神经病患者中,IENFD与足部小纤维和大纤维功能的相关性优于CCM测量。需要纵向研究来评估神经病变进展的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.90%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System is the official journal of the Peripheral Nerve Society. Founded in 1996, it is the scientific journal of choice for clinicians, clinical scientists and basic neuroscientists interested in all aspects of biology and clinical research of peripheral nervous system disorders. The Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes high quality articles on cell and molecular biology, genomics, neuropathic pain, clinical research, trials, and unique case reports on inherited and acquired peripheral neuropathies. Original articles are organized according to the topic in one of four specific areas: Mechanisms of Disease, Genetics, Clinical Research, and Clinical Trials. The journal also publishes regular review papers on hot topics and Special Issues on basic, clinical, or assembled research in the field of peripheral nervous system disorders. Authors interested in contributing a review-type article or a Special Issue should contact the Editorial Office to discuss the scope of the proposed article with the Editor-in-Chief.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信