What can the bamboo industry learn from timber? Resource mobilization across global innovation systems in the construction sector

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Francesca Mazzoni , Christian Binz , Sebastian Losacker
{"title":"What can the bamboo industry learn from timber? Resource mobilization across global innovation systems in the construction sector","authors":"Francesca Mazzoni ,&nbsp;Christian Binz ,&nbsp;Sebastian Losacker","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the scholarly literature on the geography of transitions, the global innovation systems framework has been used to understand how system resources—such as knowledge, legitimacy, markets, and financial investments—are linked across various geographical scales, contributing to the emergence and performance of an innovation system within a distinct technological field. In this paper, we further develop and adapt the conceptualization of global innovation systems to the case in which system resources of a focal innovation system are mobilized from adjacent innovation systems, building on the literature on technology interactions. Empirically, we demonstrate how multi-scalar resource mobilizations between two innovation systems emerge in the case of the evolving spatially sticky innovation system of bamboo building technologies, which draws system resources from the more mature market-anchored innovation system of timber building technologies. We find that the bamboo system mobilizes legitimacy, knowledge, and market resources from the timber system in a commensal relationship, meaning that the bamboo system benefits while the timber system is not affected by the interaction. Given the footloose nature of knowledge resources in the timber system, compared to the system’s spatially sticky valuation-related resources, the former are more easily mobilized across systems than the latter. Moreover, we posit that the distinct spatial anchoring of both systems hinders further cross-system resource mobilization. Our paper contributes to geographical innovation and transition research by providing a conceptual lens for understanding resource mobilization across innovation system boundaries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 104378"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525001782","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the scholarly literature on the geography of transitions, the global innovation systems framework has been used to understand how system resources—such as knowledge, legitimacy, markets, and financial investments—are linked across various geographical scales, contributing to the emergence and performance of an innovation system within a distinct technological field. In this paper, we further develop and adapt the conceptualization of global innovation systems to the case in which system resources of a focal innovation system are mobilized from adjacent innovation systems, building on the literature on technology interactions. Empirically, we demonstrate how multi-scalar resource mobilizations between two innovation systems emerge in the case of the evolving spatially sticky innovation system of bamboo building technologies, which draws system resources from the more mature market-anchored innovation system of timber building technologies. We find that the bamboo system mobilizes legitimacy, knowledge, and market resources from the timber system in a commensal relationship, meaning that the bamboo system benefits while the timber system is not affected by the interaction. Given the footloose nature of knowledge resources in the timber system, compared to the system’s spatially sticky valuation-related resources, the former are more easily mobilized across systems than the latter. Moreover, we posit that the distinct spatial anchoring of both systems hinders further cross-system resource mobilization. Our paper contributes to geographical innovation and transition research by providing a conceptual lens for understanding resource mobilization across innovation system boundaries.
竹业能从木材中学到什么?在建筑行业的全球创新系统中调动资源
在关于转型地理学的学术文献中,全球创新系统框架被用来理解系统资源(如知识、合法性、市场和金融投资)如何在不同的地理尺度上联系起来,从而有助于在特定技术领域内创新系统的出现和表现。在本文中,我们进一步发展和调整了全球创新系统的概念,以适应焦点创新系统的系统资源从相邻创新系统中动员的情况。实证研究表明,竹制建筑技术的空间粘性创新系统从更为成熟的以市场为基础的木结构建筑技术创新系统中汲取系统资源,从而形成了两种创新系统之间的多尺度资源动员。我们发现,竹系统以一种共生关系从木材系统中调动合法性、知识和市场资源,这意味着竹系统受益,而木材系统不受相互作用的影响。考虑到木材系统中知识资源的流动性,与系统中具有空间粘性的估值相关资源相比,前者比后者更容易跨系统调动。此外,我们假设两个系统的不同空间锚定阻碍了进一步的跨系统资源动员。本文为理解跨创新系统边界的资源调动提供了一个概念视角,有助于地理创新和转型研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信