Historical trends and future projections of cervical disc arthroplasty and removal cervical disc arthroplasty in the United States Medicare population

IF 2.5 Q3 Medicine
Tarun Mattikalli BS, Jeremy Steinberger MD, Konstantinos Margetis MD, PhD
{"title":"Historical trends and future projections of cervical disc arthroplasty and removal cervical disc arthroplasty in the United States Medicare population","authors":"Tarun Mattikalli BS,&nbsp;Jeremy Steinberger MD,&nbsp;Konstantinos Margetis MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has become an increasingly utilized alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), offering potential benefits such as motion preservation and reduced incidence of adjacent segment disease. However, long-term utilization trends and future procedural burden remain unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) volumes were extracted from the Medicare Part B National Summary between 2009 and 2022, excluding 2020, and uplifted to account for Medicare Advantage enrollment. Statistical models developed included ordinary least squares (OLS), generalized linear models (GLM), and segmented regression to detect any inflection points in utilization. Autoregressive and alternative GLMs such as Poisson and negative binomial were used for validation. For each procedure type, the model that best aligned with observed trends and statistical fit (AIC, R<sup>2</sup>) was used to generate forecasts through 2035.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Primary CDA utilization demonstrated an inflection point in 2018, after which growth stabilized. Post 2018 OLS modeling estimated a 6.2% annual growth rate, reaching an estimated 9,422 procedures by 2035 (95% CI: 5,494–16,159). Removal CDA exhibited consistent exponential growth, with GLM estimated 22.9% annual increase and a projected volume of 1,773 procedures by 2035 (95% CI: 1,183–2,656).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Primary CDA may be entering a mature adoption phase with modest projected growth, while removal CDA is expected to grow more substantially. These projections reflect trends in an older population, which may not generalize to younger individuals undergoing CDA. Our findings reinforce the need for continued surveillance, resource planning, and better understanding of long-term CDA complications in the increasingly aging population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100774"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Spine Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548425001945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has become an increasingly utilized alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), offering potential benefits such as motion preservation and reduced incidence of adjacent segment disease. However, long-term utilization trends and future procedural burden remain unclear.

Methods

Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) volumes were extracted from the Medicare Part B National Summary between 2009 and 2022, excluding 2020, and uplifted to account for Medicare Advantage enrollment. Statistical models developed included ordinary least squares (OLS), generalized linear models (GLM), and segmented regression to detect any inflection points in utilization. Autoregressive and alternative GLMs such as Poisson and negative binomial were used for validation. For each procedure type, the model that best aligned with observed trends and statistical fit (AIC, R2) was used to generate forecasts through 2035.

Results

Primary CDA utilization demonstrated an inflection point in 2018, after which growth stabilized. Post 2018 OLS modeling estimated a 6.2% annual growth rate, reaching an estimated 9,422 procedures by 2035 (95% CI: 5,494–16,159). Removal CDA exhibited consistent exponential growth, with GLM estimated 22.9% annual increase and a projected volume of 1,773 procedures by 2035 (95% CI: 1,183–2,656).

Conclusions

Primary CDA may be entering a mature adoption phase with modest projected growth, while removal CDA is expected to grow more substantially. These projections reflect trends in an older population, which may not generalize to younger individuals undergoing CDA. Our findings reinforce the need for continued surveillance, resource planning, and better understanding of long-term CDA complications in the increasingly aging population.
在美国医疗人口中,颈椎间盘置换术和移除颈椎间盘置换术的历史趋势和未来预测
背景:颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)已越来越多地成为前路颈椎间盘切除术和融合(ACDF)的替代方法,具有保留运动和减少邻近节段疾病发生率等潜在益处。但是,长期的利用趋势和今后的程序负担仍不清楚。方法从2009年至2022年(不包括2020年)的医疗保险B部分国家摘要中提取医疗保险服务收费(FFS)颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)数据,并将其提升以考虑医疗保险优惠登记。开发的统计模型包括普通最小二乘(OLS)、广义线性模型(GLM)和分段回归,以检测利用率中的任何拐点。自回归和替代glm如泊松和负二项被用于验证。对于每种程序类型,使用最符合观察趋势和统计拟合的模型(AIC, R2)来生成2035年之前的预测。结果初级CDA利用在2018年出现拐点,之后增长趋于稳定。2018年后OLS模型估计年增长率为6.2%,到2035年估计达到9,422例(95% CI: 5,494-16,159)。去除CDA表现出持续的指数增长,GLM估计每年增长22.9%,预计到2035年将有1,773例手术(95% CI: 1,183-2,656)。结论:初级CDA可能进入成熟采用阶段,预计将有适度增长,而移除CDA预计将有更大幅度的增长。这些预测反映了老年人群的趋势,这可能不适用于接受CDA的年轻人。我们的研究结果强调了持续监测、资源规划和更好地了解日益老龄化人口中长期CDA并发症的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信