Narin Salekdeh, Jade Poisson, Tao Huan and Emma C Davy*,
{"title":"Promoting Student Metacognition Through the Use of Exam Wrappers in a Second-year Analytical Chemistry Course","authors":"Narin Salekdeh, Jade Poisson, Tao Huan and Emma C Davy*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Building metacognitive strategies is crucial for undergraduate students to understand and retain topics more readily, be more motivated to learn, and get prepared for postgraduation careers. Building metacognitive skills can often come from trial and error as students progress through their undergraduate degrees. Formal support in developing these skills can come in the form of postexamination reflection surveys, commonly called <i>exam wrappers</i>. Herein we report the development and deployment of exam wrappers in a large, second-year analytical chemistry course serving 344 students annually in two sections of approximately with 178 and 166 students in the first and second semester, respectively. We felt this environment was an excellent match for this metacognitive activity as second-year analytical chemistry can be a challenging learning environment for students making the transition from novice-level general chemistry at the first-year level to a more specialized environment at the second-year level. Our exam wrapper had outstanding uptake by the students, with over 90% of students completing both exam wrappers for the first and second examinations and 93.5% of students offering positive or neutral feelings about the exam wrappers helping them prepare for future examinations through self-examination of their studying practices. Between the first and second examinations, approximately one-third of students reported a higher grade, with 38.5% of students reporting doing more practice problems, 19.2% of students starting studying earlier, and 21.2% of students completing the practice examination when they had not before. This low instructor workload, high-impact tool can be incorporated into any course in chemistry where students are assessed using assignments or examinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"102 8","pages":"3218–3225"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01105","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Building metacognitive strategies is crucial for undergraduate students to understand and retain topics more readily, be more motivated to learn, and get prepared for postgraduation careers. Building metacognitive skills can often come from trial and error as students progress through their undergraduate degrees. Formal support in developing these skills can come in the form of postexamination reflection surveys, commonly called exam wrappers. Herein we report the development and deployment of exam wrappers in a large, second-year analytical chemistry course serving 344 students annually in two sections of approximately with 178 and 166 students in the first and second semester, respectively. We felt this environment was an excellent match for this metacognitive activity as second-year analytical chemistry can be a challenging learning environment for students making the transition from novice-level general chemistry at the first-year level to a more specialized environment at the second-year level. Our exam wrapper had outstanding uptake by the students, with over 90% of students completing both exam wrappers for the first and second examinations and 93.5% of students offering positive or neutral feelings about the exam wrappers helping them prepare for future examinations through self-examination of their studying practices. Between the first and second examinations, approximately one-third of students reported a higher grade, with 38.5% of students reporting doing more practice problems, 19.2% of students starting studying earlier, and 21.2% of students completing the practice examination when they had not before. This low instructor workload, high-impact tool can be incorporated into any course in chemistry where students are assessed using assignments or examinations.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.