T V Sekher,David Flood,Hunter Green,Peifeng Hu,Mohammed K Ali,Ashwini Shete,Sarang Pedgaonkar,Kenneth M Langa,Eileen M Crimmins,David E Bloom,Jinkook Lee
{"title":"Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of diabetes in India: a nationally representative survey of adults aged 45 years and older.","authors":"T V Sekher,David Flood,Hunter Green,Peifeng Hu,Mohammed K Ali,Ashwini Shete,Sarang Pedgaonkar,Kenneth M Langa,Eileen M Crimmins,David E Bloom,Jinkook Lee","doi":"10.1016/s2214-109x(23)00502-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nIndia is a country of 1·4 billion people that contributes to much of the global diabetes burden. Updated evidence on the state of the diabetes epidemic among middle-aged and older adults is imperative given that the risk of diabetes increases with age and that clinical and public health interventions can prevent diabetes complications. We aimed to estimate the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of diabetes in a nationally representative and state-representative sample of Indians aged 45 years and older.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey of adults in India aged 45 years and older and their spouses from 2017 to 2019. Our sample included 57 810 individuals and their spouses from 36 states and union territories, reflecting a representative sample of India as a nation and of each state and union territory. Participants had available data on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) measurement and non-missing information on diabetes diagnosis, household economic status, and BMI. Spouses younger than 45 years were excluded from the analysis. Our primary outcomes were diabetes prevalence and health service indicators recommended by WHO. Diabetes prevalence was defined as individuals self-reporting a previous diabetes diagnosis or having HbA1c of 6·5% or higher. Available data did not allow the identification of type 1 versus type 2 diabetes. Diabetes health service indicators were based on four core metrics recommended by WHO: (1) proportion diagnosed out of all individuals with diabetes (awareness) and, out of individuals with diagnosed diabetes, (2) proportion with glycaemic control (measured HbA1c <7·0%), (3) proportion with blood pressure control (measured blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg), and (4) proportion self-reporting use of lipid-lowering medications. Outcomes were assessed in the national sample; by state and union territory; and across individual-level characteristics of age, sex, rural versus urban area of residence, education, economic status, and BMI.\r\n\r\nFINDINGS\r\nDiabetes prevalence among adults aged 45 years and older in India was 19·8% (95% CI 19·4-20·2), which amounted to 50·4 million people (49·4-51·4). Prevalence among men and women was similar (men, 19·6% [95% CI 19·0-20·2] and women, 20·1% [19·5-20·6]). Urban diabetes prevalence (30·0% [95% CI 29·1-30·8]) was approximately twice as high as rural prevalence (15·0% [14·6-15·5]). States with higher levels of economic development tended to have greater age-standardised prevalence (standardised regression coefficient for gross domestic product per capita 0·65 [95% CI 0·45-0·85]). Overall, 60·1% (59·0-61·2) of individuals were aware of their diabetes. Of individuals with diagnosed diabetes, 45·7% (44·3-47·2) achieved glycaemic control, 58·9% (57·5-60·4) achieved blood pressure control, and 6·4% (5·8-7·2) were taking a lipid-lowering medication.\r\n\r\nINTERPRETATION\r\nOur findings emphasise the urgent need to scale up policies to better prevent, detect, manage, and control diabetes among middle-aged and older adults in India.\r\n\r\nFUNDING\r\nUS National Institute on Aging; Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(23)00502-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
India is a country of 1·4 billion people that contributes to much of the global diabetes burden. Updated evidence on the state of the diabetes epidemic among middle-aged and older adults is imperative given that the risk of diabetes increases with age and that clinical and public health interventions can prevent diabetes complications. We aimed to estimate the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of diabetes in a nationally representative and state-representative sample of Indians aged 45 years and older.
METHODS
We conducted a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey of adults in India aged 45 years and older and their spouses from 2017 to 2019. Our sample included 57 810 individuals and their spouses from 36 states and union territories, reflecting a representative sample of India as a nation and of each state and union territory. Participants had available data on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) measurement and non-missing information on diabetes diagnosis, household economic status, and BMI. Spouses younger than 45 years were excluded from the analysis. Our primary outcomes were diabetes prevalence and health service indicators recommended by WHO. Diabetes prevalence was defined as individuals self-reporting a previous diabetes diagnosis or having HbA1c of 6·5% or higher. Available data did not allow the identification of type 1 versus type 2 diabetes. Diabetes health service indicators were based on four core metrics recommended by WHO: (1) proportion diagnosed out of all individuals with diabetes (awareness) and, out of individuals with diagnosed diabetes, (2) proportion with glycaemic control (measured HbA1c <7·0%), (3) proportion with blood pressure control (measured blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg), and (4) proportion self-reporting use of lipid-lowering medications. Outcomes were assessed in the national sample; by state and union territory; and across individual-level characteristics of age, sex, rural versus urban area of residence, education, economic status, and BMI.
FINDINGS
Diabetes prevalence among adults aged 45 years and older in India was 19·8% (95% CI 19·4-20·2), which amounted to 50·4 million people (49·4-51·4). Prevalence among men and women was similar (men, 19·6% [95% CI 19·0-20·2] and women, 20·1% [19·5-20·6]). Urban diabetes prevalence (30·0% [95% CI 29·1-30·8]) was approximately twice as high as rural prevalence (15·0% [14·6-15·5]). States with higher levels of economic development tended to have greater age-standardised prevalence (standardised regression coefficient for gross domestic product per capita 0·65 [95% CI 0·45-0·85]). Overall, 60·1% (59·0-61·2) of individuals were aware of their diabetes. Of individuals with diagnosed diabetes, 45·7% (44·3-47·2) achieved glycaemic control, 58·9% (57·5-60·4) achieved blood pressure control, and 6·4% (5·8-7·2) were taking a lipid-lowering medication.
INTERPRETATION
Our findings emphasise the urgent need to scale up policies to better prevent, detect, manage, and control diabetes among middle-aged and older adults in India.
FUNDING
US National Institute on Aging; Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Global Health is an online publication that releases monthly open access (subscription-free) issues.Each issue includes original research, commentary, and correspondence.In addition to this, the publication also provides regular blog posts.
The main focus of The Lancet Global Health is on disadvantaged populations, which can include both entire economic regions and marginalized groups within prosperous nations.The publication prefers to cover topics related to reproductive, maternal, neonatal, child, and adolescent health; infectious diseases (including neglected tropical diseases); non-communicable diseases; mental health; the global health workforce; health systems; surgery; and health policy.