Pregnant women's perceptions of RSVpreF vaccine and Nirsevimab for infant RSV prevention.

IF 3.5
Vaccine Pub Date : 2025-08-30 Epub Date: 2025-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127590
Tasmiah Nuzhath, Namanjaya Khobragade, Annette K Regan, Jodian A Pinkney, Lauren Wise, Timothy Callaghan
{"title":"Pregnant women's perceptions of RSVpreF vaccine and Nirsevimab for infant RSV prevention.","authors":"Tasmiah Nuzhath, Namanjaya Khobragade, Annette K Regan, Jodian A Pinkney, Lauren Wise, Timothy Callaghan","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common cause of infant hospitalization. Following the introduction of a prefusion F protein vaccine (RSVpreF) for pregnant women and a monoclonal antibody (nirsevimab) for infants aged <8 months in 2023, we aimed to understand public perceptions about RSV immunization to inform targeted health strategies to improve uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted two nationally representative web-based surveys of pregnant women to understand maternal RSV immunization attitudes and intentions (Wave 1: 9/20/2023-10/3/2023; N = 198; Wave 2: 5/24/2024-6/14/2024; N = 216). We used thematic analysis to identify themes and sub-themes in pooled data across both waves (N = 414).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Motivators for immunization included concerns about the disease's risks, recognized benefits of immunization, and recommendations by healthcare professionals and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Participants reported hesitation to immunize due to insufficient immunization information, low perceived disease risk, lack of trust in vaccine due to product novelty and vaccine-makers, limited availability of RSVpreF vaccine, and concerns about vaccine safety and potential side effects. Individuals who reported hesitancy shared that information needed to encourage immunization should include narratives from parents who chose immunization, research, and evidence underscoring the effectiveness and safety of the immunization, and information about access and availability of the products. Trusted sources of immunization information among all participants included (1) healthcare providers, (2) family/relatives, and (3) research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that efforts to promote RSV immunization should focus on engaging healthcare providers to improve pregnant women's knowledge and awareness related to RSV and using vaccine narratives to build confidence in RSV immunization.</p>","PeriodicalId":94264,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"62 ","pages":"127590"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common cause of infant hospitalization. Following the introduction of a prefusion F protein vaccine (RSVpreF) for pregnant women and a monoclonal antibody (nirsevimab) for infants aged <8 months in 2023, we aimed to understand public perceptions about RSV immunization to inform targeted health strategies to improve uptake.

Methods: We conducted two nationally representative web-based surveys of pregnant women to understand maternal RSV immunization attitudes and intentions (Wave 1: 9/20/2023-10/3/2023; N = 198; Wave 2: 5/24/2024-6/14/2024; N = 216). We used thematic analysis to identify themes and sub-themes in pooled data across both waves (N = 414).

Results: Motivators for immunization included concerns about the disease's risks, recognized benefits of immunization, and recommendations by healthcare professionals and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Participants reported hesitation to immunize due to insufficient immunization information, low perceived disease risk, lack of trust in vaccine due to product novelty and vaccine-makers, limited availability of RSVpreF vaccine, and concerns about vaccine safety and potential side effects. Individuals who reported hesitancy shared that information needed to encourage immunization should include narratives from parents who chose immunization, research, and evidence underscoring the effectiveness and safety of the immunization, and information about access and availability of the products. Trusted sources of immunization information among all participants included (1) healthcare providers, (2) family/relatives, and (3) research.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that efforts to promote RSV immunization should focus on engaging healthcare providers to improve pregnant women's knowledge and awareness related to RSV and using vaccine narratives to build confidence in RSV immunization.

孕妇对预防婴儿呼吸道合胞病毒RSV疫苗和Nirsevimab的认知。
背景:呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)是婴儿住院的最常见原因。在引入孕妇预融合F蛋白疫苗(RSVpreF)和婴幼儿单克隆抗体(nirsevimab)后方法:我们对孕妇进行了两次具有全国代表性的基于网络的调查,以了解母亲对RSV免疫接种的态度和意图(第1波:2023年9月20日- 2023年10月3日;n = 198;浪潮2:5/24/2024-6/14/2024;n = 216)。我们使用主题分析来识别两个波的汇总数据中的主题和子主题(N = 414)。结果:免疫接种的动机包括对疾病风险的关注,免疫接种的公认益处,以及卫生保健专业人员和疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的建议。参与者报告说,由于免疫信息不足、感知疾病风险低、由于产品新颖性和疫苗制造商对疫苗缺乏信任、RSVpreF疫苗的可用性有限以及对疫苗安全性和潜在副作用的担忧,他们对免疫接种犹豫不决。报告犹豫不决的个人认为,鼓励接种所需的信息应包括选择接种疫苗的父母的叙述、研究和强调免疫接种有效性和安全性的证据,以及有关产品获取和可得性的信息。所有参与者信任的免疫信息来源包括(1)卫生保健提供者,(2)家庭/亲属,(3)研究。结论:我们的研究结果表明,促进RSV免疫接种的努力应重点关注医疗服务提供者,以提高孕妇对RSV相关的知识和意识,并使用疫苗叙述来建立对RSV免疫接种的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信