Dose escalation in pediatric pelvic Ewing's Sarcoma: Insights from a national treatment planning exercise.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
G Beldjoudi, F Goudjil, C Lafond, S Raucoules, C Moignier, D Maneval, C Bartau, G Hangard, D Trauchessec, V Anthonipillai, W Gehin, T Lacornerie, L Claude, L Ollivier
{"title":"Dose escalation in pediatric pelvic Ewing's Sarcoma: Insights from a national treatment planning exercise.","authors":"G Beldjoudi, F Goudjil, C Lafond, S Raucoules, C Moignier, D Maneval, C Bartau, G Hangard, D Trauchessec, V Anthonipillai, W Gehin, T Lacornerie, L Claude, L Ollivier","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Inter Ewing-1 trial investigates dose escalation in definitive radiotherapy (randomization 54 Gy versus 64.8 Gy). Prior to the trial's initiation, the French Pediatric Radiotherapy Group conducted a national treatment planning exercise to assess dosimetric discrepancies associated with this dose escalation.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>A non-operated pelvic pediatric case of Ewing's sarcoma was selected. CT-scan and delineated structures were distributed to accredited participants for pediatric radio- and/or proton-therapy. Treatment planning included a simultaneous integrated boost: 54 Gy in 30 fractions (1.80 Gy/fraction) for the pre-chemotherapy tumor volume, and 63.9 Gy (2.13 Gy/fraction) for the post-chemotherapy volume. Dose constraints for organs-at-risk and target coverage were provided. All treatment plans were collected, analyzed for deviations and compared. Data were projected in a 21-dimensional(D) space and reduced to 2-D for visual representation.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>Eleven French centers submitted 14 plans (10 photon/4 proton plans). One photon plan exhibited one major and two minor deviations on organ-at-risk constraints. All photon plans presented a minor deviation regarding the constraint D0.1 cc Testis. No significant difference was observed between photons and protons for target coverage or for sparing most critical organs; however, protons showed significant advantages in DmeanBowel (9.9+/-1.1 Gy (photons) vs 3.5+/-0.4 Gy (protons), p < 0.01), and DmeanAnalCanal (3.8+/-0.7 Gy (photons) vs 2.2+/-0.9 Gy (protons), p < 0.01). Data projection revealed 3 clusters: one for protons, one for photons and one with two photon outliers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This initiative provided valuable insights into the Ewing-1 protocol, demonstrating treatment planning homogeneity among centers along with successful adherence to dose escalation constraints, with protons offering additional benefits as lower integral doses to critical organs.</p>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"137 ","pages":"105063"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105063","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The Inter Ewing-1 trial investigates dose escalation in definitive radiotherapy (randomization 54 Gy versus 64.8 Gy). Prior to the trial's initiation, the French Pediatric Radiotherapy Group conducted a national treatment planning exercise to assess dosimetric discrepancies associated with this dose escalation.

Methods and materials: A non-operated pelvic pediatric case of Ewing's sarcoma was selected. CT-scan and delineated structures were distributed to accredited participants for pediatric radio- and/or proton-therapy. Treatment planning included a simultaneous integrated boost: 54 Gy in 30 fractions (1.80 Gy/fraction) for the pre-chemotherapy tumor volume, and 63.9 Gy (2.13 Gy/fraction) for the post-chemotherapy volume. Dose constraints for organs-at-risk and target coverage were provided. All treatment plans were collected, analyzed for deviations and compared. Data were projected in a 21-dimensional(D) space and reduced to 2-D for visual representation.

Results and discussion: Eleven French centers submitted 14 plans (10 photon/4 proton plans). One photon plan exhibited one major and two minor deviations on organ-at-risk constraints. All photon plans presented a minor deviation regarding the constraint D0.1 cc Testis. No significant difference was observed between photons and protons for target coverage or for sparing most critical organs; however, protons showed significant advantages in DmeanBowel (9.9+/-1.1 Gy (photons) vs 3.5+/-0.4 Gy (protons), p < 0.01), and DmeanAnalCanal (3.8+/-0.7 Gy (photons) vs 2.2+/-0.9 Gy (protons), p < 0.01). Data projection revealed 3 clusters: one for protons, one for photons and one with two photon outliers.

Conclusion: This initiative provided valuable insights into the Ewing-1 protocol, demonstrating treatment planning homogeneity among centers along with successful adherence to dose escalation constraints, with protons offering additional benefits as lower integral doses to critical organs.

儿童骨盆尤文氏肉瘤的剂量递增:来自国家治疗计划练习的见解。
目的:interwing -1试验研究了最终放疗的剂量递增(随机分配54 Gy对64.8 Gy)。在试验开始之前,法国儿科放射治疗小组进行了一项全国治疗计划工作,以评估与剂量增加相关的剂量学差异。方法与材料:选择1例未经手术治疗的儿童骨盆尤文氏肉瘤。ct扫描和描绘的结构被分发给认可的儿童放射和/或质子治疗的参与者。治疗计划包括同步综合增强:化疗前肿瘤体积分为30个部分54 Gy (1.80 Gy/分数),化疗后肿瘤体积为63.9 Gy (2.13 Gy/分数)。提供了危险器官和目标覆盖的剂量限制。收集所有治疗方案,分析偏差并进行比较。数据投影在21维(D)空间,并减少到2-D的视觉表现。结果与讨论:11个法国中心提交了14个方案(10个光子/4个质子方案)。一个光子计划在器官风险约束上表现出一个主要和两个较小的偏差。所有的光子计划在约束D0.1 cc tests方面都有轻微的偏差。光子和质子在靶覆盖或保留大多数关键器官方面没有显著差异;然而,质子在DmeanBowel中显示出显著的优势(9.9+/-1.1 Gy(光子)vs 3.5+/-0.4 Gy(质子))。结论:这一举措为ewin -1方案提供了有价值的见解,证明了中心之间治疗计划的同质性以及成功遵守剂量递增限制,质子提供了额外的好处,因为对关键器官的整体剂量较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信