Understanding physician prescription behaviors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of macro, meso, and micro-level influences.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Giaele Moretti, Francesca Ferrè, Alma Martelli, Paola Cantarelli
{"title":"Understanding physician prescription behaviors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of macro, meso, and micro-level influences.","authors":"Giaele Moretti, Francesca Ferrè, Alma Martelli, Paola Cantarelli","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prescription is a complex act that reflects the physician's expertise and authority. While some factors affecting prescription decisions have been studied, empirical findings often conflict, leaving our understanding of prescription behaviors limited and fragmented.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the factors influencing physicians' drug prescribing habits by applying Strong Structuration Theory. Factors are categorized at: physician, practice, patient, industry, and system level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pubmed, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science were searched from inception to June 2025. Peer-reviewed studies were included if they were published in English, empirical, and assessed at least one factor influencing physicians' prescribing behaviors. Studies reporting the effect of covariates on prescriptions using Odds Ratios were included in the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>146 studies were selected for the review. At the macro-level, physicians were more likely to prescribe after being exposed to marketing activities by pharmaceutical industries, and for privately insured patients. Meso-level factors, such as practice ownership and setting, showed conflicting results, with no significant effect observed in the meta-analysis. Micro-level influences were the most prevalent in literature. Patient requests had a significant positive effect on prescriptions. Physician-level influences were inconsistent across most variables, except gender, where male physicians were more likely to prescribe. This effect was not confirmed by the meta-analysis, which showed heterogeneity across studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the complexity of prescribing behaviors and the challenges in designing effective micro-level policies. Policymakers should therefore consider the multiple influences on prescribing to design targeted interventions that promote high-quality prescribing practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"161 ","pages":"105415"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105415","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prescription is a complex act that reflects the physician's expertise and authority. While some factors affecting prescription decisions have been studied, empirical findings often conflict, leaving our understanding of prescription behaviors limited and fragmented.

Objective: To assess the factors influencing physicians' drug prescribing habits by applying Strong Structuration Theory. Factors are categorized at: physician, practice, patient, industry, and system level.

Methods: Pubmed, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science were searched from inception to June 2025. Peer-reviewed studies were included if they were published in English, empirical, and assessed at least one factor influencing physicians' prescribing behaviors. Studies reporting the effect of covariates on prescriptions using Odds Ratios were included in the meta-analysis.

Results: 146 studies were selected for the review. At the macro-level, physicians were more likely to prescribe after being exposed to marketing activities by pharmaceutical industries, and for privately insured patients. Meso-level factors, such as practice ownership and setting, showed conflicting results, with no significant effect observed in the meta-analysis. Micro-level influences were the most prevalent in literature. Patient requests had a significant positive effect on prescriptions. Physician-level influences were inconsistent across most variables, except gender, where male physicians were more likely to prescribe. This effect was not confirmed by the meta-analysis, which showed heterogeneity across studies.

Conclusion: This study highlights the complexity of prescribing behaviors and the challenges in designing effective micro-level policies. Policymakers should therefore consider the multiple influences on prescribing to design targeted interventions that promote high-quality prescribing practices.

理解医生处方行为:宏观、中观和微观影响的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:处方是一个复杂的行为,反映了医生的专业知识和权威。虽然已经研究了影响处方决策的一些因素,但实证结果往往相互冲突,使我们对处方行为的理解有限且支离破碎。目的:应用强结构理论探讨影响医师处方习惯的因素。因素分为:医生、实践、患者、行业和系统级别。方法:检索Pubmed、Scopus和ISI Web of Science,检索时间为建站至2025年6月。同行评议的研究,如果他们发表的英文,经验,并评估至少一个因素影响医生的处方行为被包括在内。使用优势比报告协变量对处方影响的研究被纳入meta分析。结果:146项研究被纳入评估。在宏观层面上,医生更有可能在接触到制药行业的营销活动后开处方,以及为私人保险患者开处方。中观水平的因素,如实践所有权和环境,显示了相互矛盾的结果,在meta分析中没有观察到显著的影响。微观层面的影响在文学中最为普遍。患者的要求对处方有显著的积极影响。医生层面的影响在大多数变量中是不一致的,除了性别,男性医生更有可能开处方。荟萃分析并未证实这一效应,荟萃分析显示了各研究的异质性。结论:本研究突出了处方行为的复杂性和设计有效微观政策的挑战。因此,决策者应考虑对处方的多重影响,以设计有针对性的干预措施,促进高质量的处方实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信