Achievements and Challenges with Equilibrium and Kinetic Passive Sampling of Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Organic Compounds in Surface Waters

IF 4.3 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Kees Booij*, Rachel Mackie, Branislav Vrana, Rainer Lohmann and Sarit L. Kaserzon*, 
{"title":"Achievements and Challenges with Equilibrium and Kinetic Passive Sampling of Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Organic Compounds in Surface Waters","authors":"Kees Booij*,&nbsp;Rachel Mackie,&nbsp;Branislav Vrana,&nbsp;Rainer Lohmann and Sarit L. Kaserzon*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.5c00384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Passive sampling in surface waters is an important method in the monitoring and risk assessment of hydrophobic and hydrophilic organic chemicals. Sampler designs can be optimized for fast equilibrium attainment (equilibrium sampling) or improved time-integrative capability (kinetic sampling). We argue that both equilibrium and kinetic sampling can be applied when aqueous concentrations do not vary with time, whereas kinetic sampling also yields useful results for time-variable concentrations that are often observed with hydrophilic compounds in surface waters. We show that these methods have similar accuracy in principle but that their dominant error sources are different: sampler-water sorption coefficients for equilibrium sampling and sampling rates for kinetic sampling. In contrast to passive sampling of hydrophobic compounds, passive sampling of hydrophilic compounds is not as well-established, but major progress has been made over the past decade in the modeling of transport through the water boundary layer, membrane, and sorbent, while less progress has been made for transport in the biofouling layer. We recommend a more extensive use of diffusion cells as a research tool to gain a better understanding of transport through the respective subphases, leading to a greater maturity of passive water sampling of hydrophilic compounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":93847,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T water","volume":"5 8","pages":"4343–4350"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.5c00384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Passive sampling in surface waters is an important method in the monitoring and risk assessment of hydrophobic and hydrophilic organic chemicals. Sampler designs can be optimized for fast equilibrium attainment (equilibrium sampling) or improved time-integrative capability (kinetic sampling). We argue that both equilibrium and kinetic sampling can be applied when aqueous concentrations do not vary with time, whereas kinetic sampling also yields useful results for time-variable concentrations that are often observed with hydrophilic compounds in surface waters. We show that these methods have similar accuracy in principle but that their dominant error sources are different: sampler-water sorption coefficients for equilibrium sampling and sampling rates for kinetic sampling. In contrast to passive sampling of hydrophobic compounds, passive sampling of hydrophilic compounds is not as well-established, but major progress has been made over the past decade in the modeling of transport through the water boundary layer, membrane, and sorbent, while less progress has been made for transport in the biofouling layer. We recommend a more extensive use of diffusion cells as a research tool to gain a better understanding of transport through the respective subphases, leading to a greater maturity of passive water sampling of hydrophilic compounds.

Abstract Image

地表水中疏水和亲水有机化合物平衡和动力学被动采样的成就与挑战
地表水被动采样是疏水和亲水有机化学品监测和风险评价的重要方法。采样器的设计可以优化为快速达到平衡(平衡采样)或提高时间整合能力(动力学采样)。我们认为,平衡采样和动力学采样都可以应用于水浓度不随时间变化的情况,而动力学采样也可以对地表水中亲水性化合物经常观察到的随时间变化的浓度产生有用的结果。我们发现这些方法在原理上具有相似的精度,但它们的主要误差来源不同:平衡采样的采样器-水吸附系数和动态采样的采样率。与疏水化合物的被动采样相比,亲水化合物的被动采样并不完善,但在过去十年中,在通过水边界层、膜和吸附剂的运输建模方面取得了重大进展,而在生物污染层中的运输方面进展较少。我们建议更广泛地使用扩散池作为研究工具,以更好地了解通过各自亚相的运输,从而使亲水性化合物的被动水采样更加成熟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信