Tap vs Bottled: Assessing PFAS Levels and Exposure Risks in Singapore’s Drinking Water

IF 4.3 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ke Tian Tan, Ping Shen*, Wei Min Ang, Ignatius Rui Long Lim, Wesley Zongrong Yu, Yuansheng Wu and Sheot Harn Chan, 
{"title":"Tap vs Bottled: Assessing PFAS Levels and Exposure Risks in Singapore’s Drinking Water","authors":"Ke Tian Tan,&nbsp;Ping Shen*,&nbsp;Wei Min Ang,&nbsp;Ignatius Rui Long Lim,&nbsp;Wesley Zongrong Yu,&nbsp;Yuansheng Wu and Sheot Harn Chan,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.5c00022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Globally, drinking water choices typically involve tap or bottled water, which is influenced by perceptions of quality and safety. Raw water sources are generally considered unsafe due to potential diseases and contaminants. The presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in drinking water has raised health concerns due to their persistence, toxicity, and potential long-term health impacts. In Singapore, tap water is the primary household drinking source, with bottled water as a supplement. Analysis of both revealed low PFAS levels, indicating minimal health risks. Detected PFAS concentrations ranged from 0.30 to 15.17 ng/L in tap water and from 0.05 to 2.45 ng/L in bottled water, well below the US Environmental Protection Agency limits. The PFAS profile primarily consisted of C4–C9 perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs) and perfluorosulfonic acids, with major contributions from PFCA and short-chain perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) containing 5 or fewer CF2 groups. This study emphasizes the need for advanced technologies to remove short-chain PFASs from drinking water and proposes future research directions to protect public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":93847,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T water","volume":"5 8","pages":"4395–4403"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.5c00022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, drinking water choices typically involve tap or bottled water, which is influenced by perceptions of quality and safety. Raw water sources are generally considered unsafe due to potential diseases and contaminants. The presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in drinking water has raised health concerns due to their persistence, toxicity, and potential long-term health impacts. In Singapore, tap water is the primary household drinking source, with bottled water as a supplement. Analysis of both revealed low PFAS levels, indicating minimal health risks. Detected PFAS concentrations ranged from 0.30 to 15.17 ng/L in tap water and from 0.05 to 2.45 ng/L in bottled water, well below the US Environmental Protection Agency limits. The PFAS profile primarily consisted of C4–C9 perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs) and perfluorosulfonic acids, with major contributions from PFCA and short-chain perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) containing 5 or fewer CF2 groups. This study emphasizes the need for advanced technologies to remove short-chain PFASs from drinking water and proposes future research directions to protect public health.

Abstract Image

自来水与瓶装:评估新加坡饮用水中的PFAS水平和暴露风险
在全球范围内,饮用水的选择通常涉及自来水或瓶装水,这受到质量和安全观念的影响。由于潜在的疾病和污染物,原始水源通常被认为是不安全的。饮用水中存在的全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFASs)由于其持久性、毒性和潜在的长期健康影响而引起了健康问题。在新加坡,自来水是家庭的主要饮用水源,瓶装水作为补充。分析显示两者的PFAS水平较低,表明健康风险最小。自来水中检测到的PFAS浓度范围为0.30至15.17纳克/升,瓶装水中的浓度范围为0.05至2.45纳克/升,远低于美国环境保护署的限制。PFAS主要由C4-C9全氟羧酸(PFCA)和全氟磺酸组成,主要来自PFCA和含5个或更少CF2基团的短链全氟烷基酸(PFAAs)。本研究强调需要先进的技术来去除饮用水中的短链PFASs,并提出了未来的研究方向,以保护公众健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信