Kate Browne*, Ewa Bałkowiec-Iskra, Andre Elferink, Marion Haberkamp, Sabine Straus, Bruno Sepodes, Francisca Silva, Florence Butlen-Ducuing, Jarno Jansen, Ivana Silva, Pavel Balabanov, Juan Garcia Burgos and Steffen Thirstrup,
{"title":"Applying the EU Regulatory Framework to Determine the Benefit–Risk Profile of Psychedelics","authors":"Kate Browne*, Ewa Bałkowiec-Iskra, Andre Elferink, Marion Haberkamp, Sabine Straus, Bruno Sepodes, Francisca Silva, Florence Butlen-Ducuing, Jarno Jansen, Ivana Silva, Pavel Balabanov, Juan Garcia Burgos and Steffen Thirstrup, ","doi":"10.1021/acsptsci.5c00456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Marketing authorization applications for psychedelics must align with the regulatory requirements and evidentiary standards required for the approval of all medicinal products in the European Union. While medicine regulators recognize the therapeutic potential of psychedelics, their characteristics present methodological challenges that complicate the design and interpretation of pivotal trials intended to assess their benefit–risk profile. This Viewpoint presents the European Medicines Agency’s perspective on the main knowledge gaps that must be addressed to ensure robust evidence generation for regulatory decision-making, as discussed at a multistakeholder workshop convened by the Agency in April 2024. Central among these are issues related to functional unblinding and expectancy and nocebo effects. Furthermore, characteristics of the trial population must be rigorously aligned with those defined in the therapeutic indication to ensure findings are relevant and generalizable. Development programmes should also support the characterization of the dose–response relationship, both in terms of pharmacological effects and the association between the subjective experience and therapeutic response. Moreover, the decision to incorporate either psychological support or psychotherapy in the therapeutic framework has methodological implications for the trial’s design and protocol, as well as the conditions for use, all of which require careful consideration. Additionally, characterization of the safety profile of psychedelics necessitates a multifaceted approach, including adequately powered clinical trials, the use of appropriate controls, the development of robust risk mitigation strategies, the establishment of continuous safety monitoring protocols, and the systematic consideration of ethical implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":36426,"journal":{"name":"ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science","volume":"8 8","pages":"2830–2838"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsptsci.5c00456","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsptsci.5c00456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Marketing authorization applications for psychedelics must align with the regulatory requirements and evidentiary standards required for the approval of all medicinal products in the European Union. While medicine regulators recognize the therapeutic potential of psychedelics, their characteristics present methodological challenges that complicate the design and interpretation of pivotal trials intended to assess their benefit–risk profile. This Viewpoint presents the European Medicines Agency’s perspective on the main knowledge gaps that must be addressed to ensure robust evidence generation for regulatory decision-making, as discussed at a multistakeholder workshop convened by the Agency in April 2024. Central among these are issues related to functional unblinding and expectancy and nocebo effects. Furthermore, characteristics of the trial population must be rigorously aligned with those defined in the therapeutic indication to ensure findings are relevant and generalizable. Development programmes should also support the characterization of the dose–response relationship, both in terms of pharmacological effects and the association between the subjective experience and therapeutic response. Moreover, the decision to incorporate either psychological support or psychotherapy in the therapeutic framework has methodological implications for the trial’s design and protocol, as well as the conditions for use, all of which require careful consideration. Additionally, characterization of the safety profile of psychedelics necessitates a multifaceted approach, including adequately powered clinical trials, the use of appropriate controls, the development of robust risk mitigation strategies, the establishment of continuous safety monitoring protocols, and the systematic consideration of ethical implications.
期刊介绍:
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science publishes high quality, innovative, and impactful research across the broad spectrum of biological sciences, covering basic and molecular sciences through to translational preclinical studies. Clinical studies that address novel mechanisms of action, and methodological papers that provide innovation, and advance translation, will also be considered. We give priority to studies that fully integrate basic pharmacological and/or biochemical findings into physiological processes that have translational potential in a broad range of biomedical disciplines. Therefore, studies that employ a complementary blend of in vitro and in vivo systems are of particular interest to the journal. Nonetheless, all innovative and impactful research that has an articulated translational relevance will be considered.
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science does not publish research on biological extracts that have unknown concentration or unknown chemical composition.
Authors are encouraged to use the pre-submission inquiry mechanism to ensure relevance and appropriateness of research.