Applying the EU Regulatory Framework to Determine the Benefit–Risk Profile of Psychedelics

IF 3.7 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Kate Browne*, Ewa Bałkowiec-Iskra, Andre Elferink, Marion Haberkamp, Sabine Straus, Bruno Sepodes, Francisca Silva, Florence Butlen-Ducuing, Jarno Jansen, Ivana Silva, Pavel Balabanov, Juan Garcia Burgos and Steffen Thirstrup, 
{"title":"Applying the EU Regulatory Framework to Determine the Benefit–Risk Profile of Psychedelics","authors":"Kate Browne*,&nbsp;Ewa Bałkowiec-Iskra,&nbsp;Andre Elferink,&nbsp;Marion Haberkamp,&nbsp;Sabine Straus,&nbsp;Bruno Sepodes,&nbsp;Francisca Silva,&nbsp;Florence Butlen-Ducuing,&nbsp;Jarno Jansen,&nbsp;Ivana Silva,&nbsp;Pavel Balabanov,&nbsp;Juan Garcia Burgos and Steffen Thirstrup,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsptsci.5c00456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Marketing authorization applications for psychedelics must align with the regulatory requirements and evidentiary standards required for the approval of all medicinal products in the European Union. While medicine regulators recognize the therapeutic potential of psychedelics, their characteristics present methodological challenges that complicate the design and interpretation of pivotal trials intended to assess their benefit–risk profile. This Viewpoint presents the European Medicines Agency’s perspective on the main knowledge gaps that must be addressed to ensure robust evidence generation for regulatory decision-making, as discussed at a multistakeholder workshop convened by the Agency in April 2024. Central among these are issues related to functional unblinding and expectancy and nocebo effects. Furthermore, characteristics of the trial population must be rigorously aligned with those defined in the therapeutic indication to ensure findings are relevant and generalizable. Development programmes should also support the characterization of the dose–response relationship, both in terms of pharmacological effects and the association between the subjective experience and therapeutic response. Moreover, the decision to incorporate either psychological support or psychotherapy in the therapeutic framework has methodological implications for the trial’s design and protocol, as well as the conditions for use, all of which require careful consideration. Additionally, characterization of the safety profile of psychedelics necessitates a multifaceted approach, including adequately powered clinical trials, the use of appropriate controls, the development of robust risk mitigation strategies, the establishment of continuous safety monitoring protocols, and the systematic consideration of ethical implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":36426,"journal":{"name":"ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science","volume":"8 8","pages":"2830–2838"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsptsci.5c00456","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsptsci.5c00456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Marketing authorization applications for psychedelics must align with the regulatory requirements and evidentiary standards required for the approval of all medicinal products in the European Union. While medicine regulators recognize the therapeutic potential of psychedelics, their characteristics present methodological challenges that complicate the design and interpretation of pivotal trials intended to assess their benefit–risk profile. This Viewpoint presents the European Medicines Agency’s perspective on the main knowledge gaps that must be addressed to ensure robust evidence generation for regulatory decision-making, as discussed at a multistakeholder workshop convened by the Agency in April 2024. Central among these are issues related to functional unblinding and expectancy and nocebo effects. Furthermore, characteristics of the trial population must be rigorously aligned with those defined in the therapeutic indication to ensure findings are relevant and generalizable. Development programmes should also support the characterization of the dose–response relationship, both in terms of pharmacological effects and the association between the subjective experience and therapeutic response. Moreover, the decision to incorporate either psychological support or psychotherapy in the therapeutic framework has methodological implications for the trial’s design and protocol, as well as the conditions for use, all of which require careful consideration. Additionally, characterization of the safety profile of psychedelics necessitates a multifaceted approach, including adequately powered clinical trials, the use of appropriate controls, the development of robust risk mitigation strategies, the establishment of continuous safety monitoring protocols, and the systematic consideration of ethical implications.

应用欧盟监管框架确定致幻剂的收益-风险概况
致幻剂的上市许可申请必须符合欧盟所有药品批准所需的监管要求和证据标准。虽然药物监管机构认识到致幻剂的治疗潜力,但它们的特性提出了方法学上的挑战,使旨在评估其收益-风险特征的关键试验的设计和解释复杂化。本观点提出了欧洲药品管理局对主要知识差距的看法,这些差距必须得到解决,以确保为监管决策提供强有力的证据,正如该机构在2024年4月召开的多利益相关者研讨会上所讨论的那样。这些问题的核心是与功能性解盲、期望和反安慰剂效应有关的问题。此外,试验人群的特征必须与治疗指征中定义的特征严格一致,以确保研究结果具有相关性和普遍性。发展规划还应支持剂量-反应关系的特征,包括药理学作用和主观经验与治疗反应之间的联系。此外,将心理支持或心理治疗纳入治疗框架的决定对试验的设计和方案以及使用条件具有方法学意义,所有这些都需要仔细考虑。此外,迷幻药安全性特征的表征需要多方面的方法,包括充分支持的临床试验,使用适当的控制,制定强有力的风险缓解策略,建立持续的安全监测协议,以及系统地考虑伦理影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science
ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science publishes high quality, innovative, and impactful research across the broad spectrum of biological sciences, covering basic and molecular sciences through to translational preclinical studies. Clinical studies that address novel mechanisms of action, and methodological papers that provide innovation, and advance translation, will also be considered. We give priority to studies that fully integrate basic pharmacological and/or biochemical findings into physiological processes that have translational potential in a broad range of biomedical disciplines. Therefore, studies that employ a complementary blend of in vitro and in vivo systems are of particular interest to the journal. Nonetheless, all innovative and impactful research that has an articulated translational relevance will be considered. ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science does not publish research on biological extracts that have unknown concentration or unknown chemical composition. Authors are encouraged to use the pre-submission inquiry mechanism to ensure relevance and appropriateness of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信