Understanding Failure to Rescue in Geriatric Trauma: A National Analysis of Predictors and Outcomes.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of Trauma Nursing Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-05 DOI:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000870
Brevin O'Connor, Hazem Nasef, Sanjan Kumar, Andrew Ford, Nickolas Hernandez, Alexander Brown, Kirk Dourvetakis, William S Havron, Adel Elkbuli
{"title":"Understanding Failure to Rescue in Geriatric Trauma: A National Analysis of Predictors and Outcomes.","authors":"Brevin O'Connor, Hazem Nasef, Sanjan Kumar, Andrew Ford, Nickolas Hernandez, Alexander Brown, Kirk Dourvetakis, William S Havron, Adel Elkbuli","doi":"10.1097/JTN.0000000000000870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as mortality following major complications, has become a critical quality metric across medical specialties.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate temporal trends, predictors, and disparities in FTR among geriatric trauma patients using a national trauma database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program dataset (2017-2021). Patients aged 65 years and older with major complications were included. FTR was defined as in-hospital mortality following complications. Demographic and clinical variables, including Injury Severity Score (ISS), Modified Frailty Index (mFI), and insurance status, were analyzed. Trauma center level and temporal trends in FTR rates were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 13,744 patients with major complications, the overall FTR rate was 44.5%, with rates increasing annually from 41.8% in 2017 to 47.2% in 2021 ( p < .001). Older age, higher ISS, and treatment at Level II and III trauma centers were significant predictors of FTR. Disparities in FTR were observed, with Asian, Black, and Hispanic patients demonstrating higher odds of FTR compared to their respective counterparts, as well as patients covered by public insurance (Medicaid and Medicare). mFI was not significantly associated with FTR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings showed a significant increase in FTR rates over time among geriatric trauma patients, with findings highlighting disparities such as race and insurance status associated with FTR, as well as predictors such as age, injury severity, and trauma verification level. Increasing access to high-level trauma centers, enhancing resource allocation, and refining care protocols are critical to mitigating FTR risk in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":51329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"260-268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000870","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as mortality following major complications, has become a critical quality metric across medical specialties.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate temporal trends, predictors, and disparities in FTR among geriatric trauma patients using a national trauma database.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program dataset (2017-2021). Patients aged 65 years and older with major complications were included. FTR was defined as in-hospital mortality following complications. Demographic and clinical variables, including Injury Severity Score (ISS), Modified Frailty Index (mFI), and insurance status, were analyzed. Trauma center level and temporal trends in FTR rates were also assessed.

Results: Among 13,744 patients with major complications, the overall FTR rate was 44.5%, with rates increasing annually from 41.8% in 2017 to 47.2% in 2021 ( p < .001). Older age, higher ISS, and treatment at Level II and III trauma centers were significant predictors of FTR. Disparities in FTR were observed, with Asian, Black, and Hispanic patients demonstrating higher odds of FTR compared to their respective counterparts, as well as patients covered by public insurance (Medicaid and Medicare). mFI was not significantly associated with FTR.

Conclusion: Findings showed a significant increase in FTR rates over time among geriatric trauma patients, with findings highlighting disparities such as race and insurance status associated with FTR, as well as predictors such as age, injury severity, and trauma verification level. Increasing access to high-level trauma centers, enhancing resource allocation, and refining care protocols are critical to mitigating FTR risk in this vulnerable population.

了解老年创伤抢救失败:一项预测因素和结果的全国分析。
背景:抢救失败(FTR),定义为主要并发症后的死亡率,已成为医学专业的关键质量指标。目的:本研究旨在利用国家创伤数据库评估老年创伤患者FTR的时间趋势、预测因素和差异。方法:采用美国外科医师学会创伤质量改善计划数据集(2017-2021)进行回顾性队列研究。患者年龄在65岁及以上,伴有主要并发症。FTR定义为并发症后的住院死亡率。统计和临床变量,包括损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、修正虚弱指数(mFI)和保险状况进行分析。创伤中心水平和FTR率的时间趋势也被评估。结果:在13744例主要并发症患者中,总FTR率为44.5%,从2017年的41.8%逐年上升至2021年的47.2% (p < 0.001)。年龄较大、ISS较高以及在II级和III级创伤中心的治疗是FTR的重要预测因素。观察到FTR的差异,亚洲,黑人和西班牙裔患者与各自的同行相比,以及公共保险(医疗补助和医疗保险)覆盖的患者表现出更高的FTR几率。mFI与FTR无显著相关。结论:研究结果显示,随着时间的推移,老年创伤患者的FTR率显著增加,研究结果突出了与FTR相关的种族和保险状况等差异,以及年龄、损伤严重程度和创伤验证水平等预测因素。增加进入高水平创伤中心的机会,加强资源分配,完善护理方案,对于减轻这一弱势群体的FTR风险至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Trauma Nursing
Journal of Trauma Nursing CRITICAL CARE MEDICINENURSING&-NURSING
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Trauma Nursing (JTN) is the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses. The Society of Trauma Nurses believes that trauma is a disease impacting patients through the continuum of care. The mission of STN is to ensure optimal trauma care through education, collaboration, leadership and membership engagement. As the official publication of the Society of Trauma Nurses, the Journal of Trauma Nursing supports the STN’s strategic goals of effective communication, education and patient advocacy with original, peer-reviewed, research and evidence-based articles and information that reflect the highest standard of collaborative care for trauma patients.​ The Journal of Trauma Nursing, through a commitment to editorial excellence, implements STN’s vision to improve practice and patient outcomes and to become the premiere global nursing organization across the trauma continuum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信