Between host country and homeland: a grounded theory study on place of dying and death in migrant cancer patients.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Simona Sacchi, Loredana Buonaccorso, Silvia Tanzi, Giulietta Luul Balestra, Luca Ghirotto
{"title":"Between host country and homeland: a grounded theory study on place of dying and death in migrant cancer patients.","authors":"Simona Sacchi, Loredana Buonaccorso, Silvia Tanzi, Giulietta Luul Balestra, Luca Ghirotto","doi":"10.1186/s12904-025-01821-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Migrant cancer patients face unique challenges in end-of-life decision-making. One key yet underexplored aspect is the decision-making process surrounding the place of dying and death. This study explores the factors influencing these decisions involving migrant cancer patients in Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A constructivist grounded theory approach was employed. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 28 participants (patients, family members, cultural mediators, and other key informants, some from a previous grounded theory study). Theoretical sampling guided participant selection for this study, and data analysis followed an iterative coding process, leading to the development of a conceptual model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The decision-making process was conceptualized as a gradient field in which three forces interact to shape outcomes: (1) Healthcare as an Attracting/Holding Force-quality medical care in Italy encouraged patients to stay, though its influence diminished as curative treatments ended; (2) Bureaucratic and Financial Barriers as an Obstructing Force-challenges related to residency, access to care, and financial constraints often complicated decision-making, particularly for those considering repatriation; and (3) Social Networks as a Stabilizing Force-the strength of familial and community ties in host country and homeland played a decisive role in shaping preferences. A fundamental opacity about terminality was present, with limited communication and awareness regarding prognosis, further expanding the circle of decision-makers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Palliative care professionals should recognize the importance of transnational networks, consider bureaucratic barriers, and encourage open discussions regarding place of dying and death decision. To navigate these complexities, we propose a question guide for specialists during consultations. This tool aims to enhance culturally sensitive communication, promote shared decision-making, and address the challenges of cross-border end-of-life care. By accommodating transnational ties, palliative care services can better align with the realities of migrant cancer patients, fostering equitable and dignified end-of-life care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"24 1","pages":"220"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12335150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-025-01821-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Migrant cancer patients face unique challenges in end-of-life decision-making. One key yet underexplored aspect is the decision-making process surrounding the place of dying and death. This study explores the factors influencing these decisions involving migrant cancer patients in Italy.

Methods: A constructivist grounded theory approach was employed. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 28 participants (patients, family members, cultural mediators, and other key informants, some from a previous grounded theory study). Theoretical sampling guided participant selection for this study, and data analysis followed an iterative coding process, leading to the development of a conceptual model.

Results: The decision-making process was conceptualized as a gradient field in which three forces interact to shape outcomes: (1) Healthcare as an Attracting/Holding Force-quality medical care in Italy encouraged patients to stay, though its influence diminished as curative treatments ended; (2) Bureaucratic and Financial Barriers as an Obstructing Force-challenges related to residency, access to care, and financial constraints often complicated decision-making, particularly for those considering repatriation; and (3) Social Networks as a Stabilizing Force-the strength of familial and community ties in host country and homeland played a decisive role in shaping preferences. A fundamental opacity about terminality was present, with limited communication and awareness regarding prognosis, further expanding the circle of decision-makers.

Conclusions: Palliative care professionals should recognize the importance of transnational networks, consider bureaucratic barriers, and encourage open discussions regarding place of dying and death decision. To navigate these complexities, we propose a question guide for specialists during consultations. This tool aims to enhance culturally sensitive communication, promote shared decision-making, and address the challenges of cross-border end-of-life care. By accommodating transnational ties, palliative care services can better align with the realities of migrant cancer patients, fostering equitable and dignified end-of-life care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

东道国与祖国之间:移民癌症患者死亡地点与死亡的扎根理论研究。
背景:移民癌症患者在临终决策方面面临着独特的挑战。一个未被充分探索的关键方面是围绕死亡地点和死亡的决策过程。本研究探讨了影响意大利移民癌症患者做出这些决定的因素。方法:采用建构主义扎根理论研究方法。数据通过与28名参与者(患者、家庭成员、文化调解者和其他关键信息提供者,其中一些来自先前的有根据的理论研究)的半结构化访谈收集。理论抽样指导了本研究的参与者选择,数据分析遵循迭代编码过程,导致概念模型的发展。结果:决策过程被概念化为一个梯度场,在这个梯度场中,三种力量相互作用来塑造结果:(1)医疗保健作为一种吸引/保持力量——意大利的优质医疗保健鼓励患者留下来,尽管其影响随着治愈性治疗的结束而减弱;(2)官僚和财务障碍是一种阻碍力量——与居住、获得护理和财务限制有关的挑战往往使决策复杂化,特别是对于那些考虑遣返的人;(3)社会网络作为一种稳定力量——在东道国和祖国的家庭和社区关系的强度在形成偏好方面发挥了决定性作用。对终末期存在根本的不透明,对预后的沟通和认识有限,进一步扩大了决策者的圈子。结论:姑息治疗专业人员应认识到跨国网络的重要性,考虑官僚障碍,并鼓励就死亡地点和死亡决定进行公开讨论。为了应对这些复杂性,我们在会诊期间为专家提出了一个问题指南。该工具旨在加强文化敏感的沟通,促进共同决策,并应对跨境临终关怀的挑战。通过适应跨国联系,姑息治疗服务可以更好地与移民癌症患者的现实保持一致,促进公平和有尊严的临终关怀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信