Assessment of Pharmacokinetics and Safety with Bioequivalence of the Nitroglycerin Sublingual Tablets of Two Formulations in Chinese Healthy Subjects: A Bioequivalence Study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Drugs in Research & Development Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-08 DOI:10.1007/s40268-025-00519-4
Qinjiao Fu, Chunqi Huang, Yuan Yuan, Yu Wang, Bin Zhu, Yanzhu Liu, Fang Tian, Xiufeng Xu, Lei Yang, Yingying Xu, Ying Wang
{"title":"Assessment of Pharmacokinetics and Safety with Bioequivalence of the Nitroglycerin Sublingual Tablets of Two Formulations in Chinese Healthy Subjects: A Bioequivalence Study.","authors":"Qinjiao Fu, Chunqi Huang, Yuan Yuan, Yu Wang, Bin Zhu, Yanzhu Liu, Fang Tian, Xiufeng Xu, Lei Yang, Yingying Xu, Ying Wang","doi":"10.1007/s40268-025-00519-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Nitroglycerin, a cornerstone therapy for acute angina pectoris, achieves rapid symptom relief through sublingual administration by bypassing hepatic first-pass metabolism. This study aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK), bioequivalence, and safety profiles between a test (T) formulation and a reference (R) formulation of nitroglycerin sublingual tablets in healthy volunteers (HVs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, randomized, open, single-dose, two-part formulations, four-cycle, two-sequence complete repeat crossover design, fasting-dose bioequivalence study, HVs (n = 36) were 1:1 divided into two groups (T-R-T-R and R-T-R-T) and received 0.6 mg of nitroglycerin sublingual with a 3 d washout. Venous blood was collected 3 h after each administration. Plasma levels of nitroglycerin were analyzed using a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) technique, and PK parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For nitroglycerin, the bioequivalence between the test and reference formulations was assessed using the Reference-Scaled Average Bioequivalence (RSABE) method for the maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>), area under the curve (AUC) from t = 0 to infinity (AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>) and AUC from t = 0 to the final measurable concentration (AUC<sub>0-t</sub>). Results showed that the least squares geometric mean ratios (T/R) of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> for nitroglycerin (94.62%, 89.92%, and 89.44%, respectively) were in the range of 80.00-125.00%, and the upper limit of unilateral 95% confidence interval (CI) of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> for nitroglycerin (-0.06, -0.03, and -0.03, respectively) were less than 0. Safety profiles were comparable between formulations, with no serious adverse events (AE) reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study confirmed bioequivalence between the test and reference formulations, demonstrating equivalent absorption rates (C<sub>max</sub>) and extents (AUC). Rapid therapeutic plasma levels were achieved via sublingual administration, aligning with nitroglycerin's clinical need for prompt angina relief. These findings, combined with favorable safety data, support the test formulation as a therapeutically equivalent alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":49258,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Research & Development","volume":" ","pages":"263-274"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-025-00519-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Nitroglycerin, a cornerstone therapy for acute angina pectoris, achieves rapid symptom relief through sublingual administration by bypassing hepatic first-pass metabolism. This study aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK), bioequivalence, and safety profiles between a test (T) formulation and a reference (R) formulation of nitroglycerin sublingual tablets in healthy volunteers (HVs).

Methods: In this single-center, randomized, open, single-dose, two-part formulations, four-cycle, two-sequence complete repeat crossover design, fasting-dose bioequivalence study, HVs (n = 36) were 1:1 divided into two groups (T-R-T-R and R-T-R-T) and received 0.6 mg of nitroglycerin sublingual with a 3 d washout. Venous blood was collected 3 h after each administration. Plasma levels of nitroglycerin were analyzed using a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) technique, and PK parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods.

Results: For nitroglycerin, the bioequivalence between the test and reference formulations was assessed using the Reference-Scaled Average Bioequivalence (RSABE) method for the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the curve (AUC) from t = 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) and AUC from t = 0 to the final measurable concentration (AUC0-t). Results showed that the least squares geometric mean ratios (T/R) of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ for nitroglycerin (94.62%, 89.92%, and 89.44%, respectively) were in the range of 80.00-125.00%, and the upper limit of unilateral 95% confidence interval (CI) of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ for nitroglycerin (-0.06, -0.03, and -0.03, respectively) were less than 0. Safety profiles were comparable between formulations, with no serious adverse events (AE) reported.

Conclusions: The study confirmed bioequivalence between the test and reference formulations, demonstrating equivalent absorption rates (Cmax) and extents (AUC). Rapid therapeutic plasma levels were achieved via sublingual administration, aligning with nitroglycerin's clinical need for prompt angina relief. These findings, combined with favorable safety data, support the test formulation as a therapeutically equivalent alternative.

两种剂型硝酸甘油舌下片在中国健康人体内的药代动力学及安全性生物等效性评价:生物等效性研究。
背景与目的:硝酸甘油是治疗急性心绞痛的基础药物,通过舌下给药,绕过肝脏第一过代谢,可快速缓解症状。本研究旨在探讨硝酸甘油舌下片在健康志愿者(HVs)体内的药代动力学(PK)、生物等效性和安全性。方法:在单中心、随机、开放、单剂量、两部分配方、四周期、两序列完全重复交叉设计、禁食剂量生物等效性研究中,将36例HVs (n = 36) 1:1分为两组(T-R-T-R和R-T-R-T - r- t),接受0.6 mg硝酸甘油舌下治疗,3 d洗脱期。每次给药后3 h采集静脉血。采用高效液相色谱-串联质谱(HPLC-MS/MS)技术分析血浆中硝酸甘油的水平,并采用非区室法计算PK参数。结果:对硝酸甘油,采用参考标度平均生物等效性(RSABE)方法对最大血浆浓度(Cmax)、t = 0至∞范围内的曲线下面积(AUC) (AUC0-∞)和t = 0至最终可测浓度范围内的AUC (AUC0-t)进行生物等效性评估。结果表明,硝酸甘油的Cmax、AUC0- T和AUC0-∞的最小二乘几何平均比(T/R)(分别为94.62%、89.92%和89.44%)在80.00 ~ 125.00%范围内,硝酸甘油的Cmax、AUC0- T和AUC0-∞的单侧95%置信区间(CI)上限(分别为-0.06、-0.03和-0.03)均小于0。两种制剂的安全性具有可比性,未报告严重不良事件(AE)。结论:该研究证实了试验制剂与参比制剂之间的生物等效性,显示了等效吸收率(Cmax)和吸收率(AUC)。通过舌下给药达到快速治疗血浆水平,符合硝酸甘油快速缓解心绞痛的临床需要。这些发现,结合良好的安全性数据,支持试验配方作为治疗等效的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drugs in Research & Development
Drugs in Research & Development Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs in R&D is an international, peer reviewed, open access, online only journal, and provides timely information from all phases of drug research and development that will inform clinical practice. Healthcare decision makers are thus provided with knowledge about the developing place of a drug in therapy. The Journal includes: Clinical research on new and established drugs; Preclinical research of direct relevance to clinical drug development; Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered; Reviews may also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信