Assessment of Pharmacokinetics and Safety with Bioequivalence of the Nitroglycerin Sublingual Tablets of Two Formulations in Chinese Healthy Subjects: A Bioequivalence Study.
Qinjiao Fu, Chunqi Huang, Yuan Yuan, Yu Wang, Bin Zhu, Yanzhu Liu, Fang Tian, Xiufeng Xu, Lei Yang, Yingying Xu, Ying Wang
{"title":"Assessment of Pharmacokinetics and Safety with Bioequivalence of the Nitroglycerin Sublingual Tablets of Two Formulations in Chinese Healthy Subjects: A Bioequivalence Study.","authors":"Qinjiao Fu, Chunqi Huang, Yuan Yuan, Yu Wang, Bin Zhu, Yanzhu Liu, Fang Tian, Xiufeng Xu, Lei Yang, Yingying Xu, Ying Wang","doi":"10.1007/s40268-025-00519-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Nitroglycerin, a cornerstone therapy for acute angina pectoris, achieves rapid symptom relief through sublingual administration by bypassing hepatic first-pass metabolism. This study aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK), bioequivalence, and safety profiles between a test (T) formulation and a reference (R) formulation of nitroglycerin sublingual tablets in healthy volunteers (HVs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, randomized, open, single-dose, two-part formulations, four-cycle, two-sequence complete repeat crossover design, fasting-dose bioequivalence study, HVs (n = 36) were 1:1 divided into two groups (T-R-T-R and R-T-R-T) and received 0.6 mg of nitroglycerin sublingual with a 3 d washout. Venous blood was collected 3 h after each administration. Plasma levels of nitroglycerin were analyzed using a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) technique, and PK parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For nitroglycerin, the bioequivalence between the test and reference formulations was assessed using the Reference-Scaled Average Bioequivalence (RSABE) method for the maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>), area under the curve (AUC) from t = 0 to infinity (AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>) and AUC from t = 0 to the final measurable concentration (AUC<sub>0-t</sub>). Results showed that the least squares geometric mean ratios (T/R) of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> for nitroglycerin (94.62%, 89.92%, and 89.44%, respectively) were in the range of 80.00-125.00%, and the upper limit of unilateral 95% confidence interval (CI) of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> for nitroglycerin (-0.06, -0.03, and -0.03, respectively) were less than 0. Safety profiles were comparable between formulations, with no serious adverse events (AE) reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study confirmed bioequivalence between the test and reference formulations, demonstrating equivalent absorption rates (C<sub>max</sub>) and extents (AUC). Rapid therapeutic plasma levels were achieved via sublingual administration, aligning with nitroglycerin's clinical need for prompt angina relief. These findings, combined with favorable safety data, support the test formulation as a therapeutically equivalent alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":49258,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Research & Development","volume":" ","pages":"263-274"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-025-00519-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective: Nitroglycerin, a cornerstone therapy for acute angina pectoris, achieves rapid symptom relief through sublingual administration by bypassing hepatic first-pass metabolism. This study aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK), bioequivalence, and safety profiles between a test (T) formulation and a reference (R) formulation of nitroglycerin sublingual tablets in healthy volunteers (HVs).
Methods: In this single-center, randomized, open, single-dose, two-part formulations, four-cycle, two-sequence complete repeat crossover design, fasting-dose bioequivalence study, HVs (n = 36) were 1:1 divided into two groups (T-R-T-R and R-T-R-T) and received 0.6 mg of nitroglycerin sublingual with a 3 d washout. Venous blood was collected 3 h after each administration. Plasma levels of nitroglycerin were analyzed using a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) technique, and PK parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods.
Results: For nitroglycerin, the bioequivalence between the test and reference formulations was assessed using the Reference-Scaled Average Bioequivalence (RSABE) method for the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the curve (AUC) from t = 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) and AUC from t = 0 to the final measurable concentration (AUC0-t). Results showed that the least squares geometric mean ratios (T/R) of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ for nitroglycerin (94.62%, 89.92%, and 89.44%, respectively) were in the range of 80.00-125.00%, and the upper limit of unilateral 95% confidence interval (CI) of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ for nitroglycerin (-0.06, -0.03, and -0.03, respectively) were less than 0. Safety profiles were comparable between formulations, with no serious adverse events (AE) reported.
Conclusions: The study confirmed bioequivalence between the test and reference formulations, demonstrating equivalent absorption rates (Cmax) and extents (AUC). Rapid therapeutic plasma levels were achieved via sublingual administration, aligning with nitroglycerin's clinical need for prompt angina relief. These findings, combined with favorable safety data, support the test formulation as a therapeutically equivalent alternative.
期刊介绍:
Drugs in R&D is an international, peer reviewed, open access, online only journal, and provides timely information from all phases of drug research and development that will inform clinical practice. Healthcare decision makers are thus provided with knowledge about the developing place of a drug in therapy.
The Journal includes:
Clinical research on new and established drugs;
Preclinical research of direct relevance to clinical drug development;
Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered;
Reviews may also be considered.