Mixed methods evaluation of a digital tool to support the transfer of medication information from ICU to ward.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Melissa T Baysari, Kristian Stanceski, Bethany A Van Dort, Jacques Raubenheimer, Lily Pham, Danielle Deidun, Adeola Bamgboje-Ayodele, Duncan Mackay, Jonathan Penm, Kevin Sam, Selvana Awad, Gordon Flynn, Atul Gaur, Stuart Lane
{"title":"Mixed methods evaluation of a digital tool to support the transfer of medication information from ICU to ward.","authors":"Melissa T Baysari, Kristian Stanceski, Bethany A Van Dort, Jacques Raubenheimer, Lily Pham, Danielle Deidun, Adeola Bamgboje-Ayodele, Duncan Mackay, Jonathan Penm, Kevin Sam, Selvana Awad, Gordon Flynn, Atul Gaur, Stuart Lane","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transfer of medication information from intensive care units (ICUs) to general wards is error prone. Additional challenges emerge in hospitals where a different electronic medical record (eMR) is used in ICU and wards. Digital transfer systems, that support information transfer between different eMRs, could minimise errors, but limited research has evaluated these. We aimed to 1) determine the impact of eTOC, a medication transfer system, on medication errors and potential patient harms that occur during ICU-to-ward transfers, 2) to determine frequency of eTOC use post-implementation, and 3) explore how eTOC is used and viewed by clinicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods approach was used at one metropolitan and one regional hospital in NSW, Australia. Part 1 comprised a pragmatic pre-post chart-review study (n = 200 patient transfers) and Part 2 used a qualitative approach, including usability testing (n = 4) and semi-structured interviews with clinicians (n = 11).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implementation of the eTOC system did not significantly reduce the number of transfers containing an error (51 % vs 46 %, pre-post). Although the use of eTOC more than halved the odds of a medication error occurring (OR: 0.44, 95 %CI: 0.27-0.71), the system was inconsistently used. Interviews and usability testing revealed that barriers related both to system design/configuration and to the context of use and organisation (e.g., time pressure) impacted uptake of eTOC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is significant potential for technology to support transfer of medication information from ICU to the ward and improve safety if technology is designed well and aligns with how work is done in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"91 ","pages":"155219"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155219","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transfer of medication information from intensive care units (ICUs) to general wards is error prone. Additional challenges emerge in hospitals where a different electronic medical record (eMR) is used in ICU and wards. Digital transfer systems, that support information transfer between different eMRs, could minimise errors, but limited research has evaluated these. We aimed to 1) determine the impact of eTOC, a medication transfer system, on medication errors and potential patient harms that occur during ICU-to-ward transfers, 2) to determine frequency of eTOC use post-implementation, and 3) explore how eTOC is used and viewed by clinicians.

Methods: A mixed methods approach was used at one metropolitan and one regional hospital in NSW, Australia. Part 1 comprised a pragmatic pre-post chart-review study (n = 200 patient transfers) and Part 2 used a qualitative approach, including usability testing (n = 4) and semi-structured interviews with clinicians (n = 11).

Results: Implementation of the eTOC system did not significantly reduce the number of transfers containing an error (51 % vs 46 %, pre-post). Although the use of eTOC more than halved the odds of a medication error occurring (OR: 0.44, 95 %CI: 0.27-0.71), the system was inconsistently used. Interviews and usability testing revealed that barriers related both to system design/configuration and to the context of use and organisation (e.g., time pressure) impacted uptake of eTOC.

Conclusions: There is significant potential for technology to support transfer of medication information from ICU to the ward and improve safety if technology is designed well and aligns with how work is done in practice.

支持从ICU到病房的药物信息传递的数字工具的混合方法评估。
背景:从重症监护病房(icu)到普通病房的药物信息传递容易出错。在ICU和病房使用不同电子医疗记录(eMR)的医院中出现了其他挑战。支持不同电子病历之间信息传递的数字传输系统可以最大限度地减少错误,但对这些系统进行评估的研究有限。我们的目的是1)确定eTOC(一种药物转移系统)对在icu到病房转移过程中发生的药物错误和潜在患者伤害的影响,2)确定实施后使用eTOC的频率,以及3)探索临床医生如何使用和看待eTOC。方法:在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的一家城市医院和一家地区医院采用混合方法。第一部分包括一项实用的前后图表回顾研究(n = 200例患者转移),第二部分使用定性方法,包括可用性测试(n = 4)和与临床医生的半结构化访谈(n = 11)。结果:eTOC系统的实施并没有显著减少包含错误的转移次数(51%对46%,post前)。虽然使用eTOC使用药错误发生的几率减少了一半以上(OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.27-0.71),但该系统的使用并不一致。访谈和可用性测试显示,与系统设计/配置以及使用和组织背景(例如,时间压力)相关的障碍影响了eTOC的吸收。结论:如果技术设计良好并与实际工作相一致,那么技术支持将药物信息从ICU转移到病房并提高安全性的潜力很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of critical care
Journal of critical care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
237
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice. The Journal will include articles which discuss: All aspects of health services research in critical care System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients The team approach in the OR and ICU System-based research Medical ethics Technology in medicine Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education Residency Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信