Melissa T Baysari, Kristian Stanceski, Bethany A Van Dort, Jacques Raubenheimer, Lily Pham, Danielle Deidun, Adeola Bamgboje-Ayodele, Duncan Mackay, Jonathan Penm, Kevin Sam, Selvana Awad, Gordon Flynn, Atul Gaur, Stuart Lane
{"title":"Mixed methods evaluation of a digital tool to support the transfer of medication information from ICU to ward.","authors":"Melissa T Baysari, Kristian Stanceski, Bethany A Van Dort, Jacques Raubenheimer, Lily Pham, Danielle Deidun, Adeola Bamgboje-Ayodele, Duncan Mackay, Jonathan Penm, Kevin Sam, Selvana Awad, Gordon Flynn, Atul Gaur, Stuart Lane","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transfer of medication information from intensive care units (ICUs) to general wards is error prone. Additional challenges emerge in hospitals where a different electronic medical record (eMR) is used in ICU and wards. Digital transfer systems, that support information transfer between different eMRs, could minimise errors, but limited research has evaluated these. We aimed to 1) determine the impact of eTOC, a medication transfer system, on medication errors and potential patient harms that occur during ICU-to-ward transfers, 2) to determine frequency of eTOC use post-implementation, and 3) explore how eTOC is used and viewed by clinicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods approach was used at one metropolitan and one regional hospital in NSW, Australia. Part 1 comprised a pragmatic pre-post chart-review study (n = 200 patient transfers) and Part 2 used a qualitative approach, including usability testing (n = 4) and semi-structured interviews with clinicians (n = 11).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implementation of the eTOC system did not significantly reduce the number of transfers containing an error (51 % vs 46 %, pre-post). Although the use of eTOC more than halved the odds of a medication error occurring (OR: 0.44, 95 %CI: 0.27-0.71), the system was inconsistently used. Interviews and usability testing revealed that barriers related both to system design/configuration and to the context of use and organisation (e.g., time pressure) impacted uptake of eTOC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is significant potential for technology to support transfer of medication information from ICU to the ward and improve safety if technology is designed well and aligns with how work is done in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"91 ","pages":"155219"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155219","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Transfer of medication information from intensive care units (ICUs) to general wards is error prone. Additional challenges emerge in hospitals where a different electronic medical record (eMR) is used in ICU and wards. Digital transfer systems, that support information transfer between different eMRs, could minimise errors, but limited research has evaluated these. We aimed to 1) determine the impact of eTOC, a medication transfer system, on medication errors and potential patient harms that occur during ICU-to-ward transfers, 2) to determine frequency of eTOC use post-implementation, and 3) explore how eTOC is used and viewed by clinicians.
Methods: A mixed methods approach was used at one metropolitan and one regional hospital in NSW, Australia. Part 1 comprised a pragmatic pre-post chart-review study (n = 200 patient transfers) and Part 2 used a qualitative approach, including usability testing (n = 4) and semi-structured interviews with clinicians (n = 11).
Results: Implementation of the eTOC system did not significantly reduce the number of transfers containing an error (51 % vs 46 %, pre-post). Although the use of eTOC more than halved the odds of a medication error occurring (OR: 0.44, 95 %CI: 0.27-0.71), the system was inconsistently used. Interviews and usability testing revealed that barriers related both to system design/configuration and to the context of use and organisation (e.g., time pressure) impacted uptake of eTOC.
Conclusions: There is significant potential for technology to support transfer of medication information from ICU to the ward and improve safety if technology is designed well and aligns with how work is done in practice.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice.
The Journal will include articles which discuss:
All aspects of health services research in critical care
System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine
The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain
Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery
Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients
The team approach in the OR and ICU
System-based research
Medical ethics
Technology in medicine
Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education
Residency Education.