Pregnancy outcomes following history- and ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage: a 10-year retrospective cohort study from a tertiary center.

IF 1.7 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Przeglad Menopauzalny Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-12 DOI:10.5114/pm.2025.152085
Andrzej Jaworowski, Julia Jurga, Hubert Huras, Aleksander Gałaś, Gabriela Mierzwa, Aleksandra Stasiak, Magdalena Kołak
{"title":"Pregnancy outcomes following history- and ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage: a 10-year retrospective cohort study from a tertiary center.","authors":"Andrzej Jaworowski, Julia Jurga, Hubert Huras, Aleksander Gałaś, Gabriela Mierzwa, Aleksandra Stasiak, Magdalena Kołak","doi":"10.5114/pm.2025.152085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cervical cerclage is a method used to prevent preterm delivery in pregnant women diagnosed with cervical insufficiency or a short cervix. This study aimed to compare pregnancy outcomes between cervical cerclage procedures performed due to history- and ultrasound-based indications.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Perinatology of the University Hospital in Cracow, Poland, a tertiary healthcare center. The study included women with singleton pregnancies who underwent cervical cerclage placement and subsequently gave birth in our department between 2013-2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 136 participants, 89 (65.4%) received history-indicated cerclage, and 47 (34.6%) underwent an ultrasound-indicated procedure. No statistically significant differences were found regarding miscarriage rates (3.4% vs. 2.1%) or preterm birth rates before 32 (9.0% vs. 14.9%), 34 (11.2% vs. 14.9%), and 37 (22.5% vs. 38.3%) gestational weeks between the history- and ultrasound-indicated groups (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.05). The median gestational age at delivery was 38.4 weeks for history-indicated cerclage and 38.3 weeks for ultrasound-indicated cerclage (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pregnancy outcomes following history-indicated cervical cerclage are comparable to those of ultrasound-indicated procedures. Consequently, emphasis should shift from predominantly performing prophylactic procedures to systematic cervical length screening and selective cerclage placement in cases of cervical shortening. Cervical cerclage remains an effective intervention for prolonging pregnancy in women with cervical insufficiency and a short cervix.</p>","PeriodicalId":55643,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Menopauzalny","volume":"24 2","pages":"113-119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12327217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad Menopauzalny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2025.152085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cervical cerclage is a method used to prevent preterm delivery in pregnant women diagnosed with cervical insufficiency or a short cervix. This study aimed to compare pregnancy outcomes between cervical cerclage procedures performed due to history- and ultrasound-based indications.

Material and methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Perinatology of the University Hospital in Cracow, Poland, a tertiary healthcare center. The study included women with singleton pregnancies who underwent cervical cerclage placement and subsequently gave birth in our department between 2013-2023.

Results: Among 136 participants, 89 (65.4%) received history-indicated cerclage, and 47 (34.6%) underwent an ultrasound-indicated procedure. No statistically significant differences were found regarding miscarriage rates (3.4% vs. 2.1%) or preterm birth rates before 32 (9.0% vs. 14.9%), 34 (11.2% vs. 14.9%), and 37 (22.5% vs. 38.3%) gestational weeks between the history- and ultrasound-indicated groups (p ≥ 0.05). The median gestational age at delivery was 38.4 weeks for history-indicated cerclage and 38.3 weeks for ultrasound-indicated cerclage (p ≥ 0.05).

Conclusions: Pregnancy outcomes following history-indicated cervical cerclage are comparable to those of ultrasound-indicated procedures. Consequently, emphasis should shift from predominantly performing prophylactic procedures to systematic cervical length screening and selective cerclage placement in cases of cervical shortening. Cervical cerclage remains an effective intervention for prolonging pregnancy in women with cervical insufficiency and a short cervix.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

历史和超声提示宫颈环切术后妊娠结局:来自三级中心的10年回顾性队列研究。
宫颈环扎术是一种用于预防诊断为宫颈功能不全或宫颈短的孕妇早产的方法。本研究旨在比较基于病史和超声适应症的宫颈环切术的妊娠结局。材料和方法:这项回顾性队列研究是在波兰克拉科夫大学医院产科和围产期进行的,这是一家三级医疗保健中心。本研究纳入2013-2023年间在我科接受宫颈环切术并分娩的单胎妊娠妇女。结果:在136名参与者中,89名(65.4%)接受了病史指示的环切术,47名(34.6%)接受了超声指示的手术。流产率(3.4% vs. 2.1%)或32周(9.0% vs. 14.9%)、34周(11.2% vs. 14.9%)和37周(22.5% vs. 38.3%)妊娠期前早产率在有病史组和超声指示组之间无统计学差异(p≥0.05)。分娩时中位胎龄:史指环切为38.4周,超声指环切为38.3周(p≥0.05)。结论:有病史的宫颈环切术的妊娠结局与超声指示的妊娠结局相当。因此,在颈椎缩短的情况下,重点应从主要执行预防性程序转移到系统的宫颈长度筛查和选择性环扎置入。宫颈环切术仍然是延长宫颈功能不全和宫颈短的妇女妊娠的有效干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Przeglad Menopauzalny
Przeglad Menopauzalny OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Menopausal Review is a scientific bimonthly aimed at gynecologists and endocrinologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信