Patient Repayment of US Hospital Bills From 2018 to 2024.

IF 11.3 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Benedic Ippolito, Erin Trish, Erin L Duffy, Boris Vabson
{"title":"Patient Repayment of US Hospital Bills From 2018 to 2024.","authors":"Benedic Ippolito, Erin Trish, Erin L Duffy, Boris Vabson","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Patient cost sharing liability has risen in recent years, increasing the costs associated with care for patient households and imposing collections challenges for hospitals and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure patient repayment of cost sharing over recent years, and how that varies across patient, hospital, and service characteristics.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study of billing and payment data from a revenue cycle management company examined patient accounts at 217 US hospitals from 2018 to 2024. Participants included 24.5 million and 6.2 million patient episodes of care with positive patient out-of-pocket liability for individuals with private insurance and Medicare Advantage, respectively.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Percentage of owed patient cost sharing actually paid among patients with private insurance and Medicare Advantage measured over time, for inpatient and outpatient care and by bill size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the full sample of 217 US hospitals (30.7 million patient episodes), mean (SD) patient liability per person, including those with no liability, was higher for individuals with private insurance ($375.41 [$51.55]) than those with Medicare Advantage ($172.50 [$14.84]). Consistent with high-deductible plan design with annual resetting, mean patient liability was higher for visits in January than December, particularly among the privately insured (eg, mean [SD] patient liability for visits among the privately insured in January: $479.44 [$29.21] vs December: $321.63 [$14.29]). Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (January 2018-February 2020), mean repayment rates were 53.9% and 54.0% for patients with private or Medicare Advantage insurance, respectively, and repayment rates declined in more recent years. Across the entire sample, patients with private or Medicare Advantage insurance paid either 0% or 100% of their owed cost sharing in 92.2% and 94.1% of cases, respectively. Repayment rates varied by bill size with lower repayment rates on the largest bills and the smallest bills, and higher repayment rates on midsized bills.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This cross-sectional study found that patient cost sharing repayments were incomplete and have fallen in more recent years, which result in both medical debts for patients and collections shortfalls for hospitals and clinicians. These findings suggest that changes to insurance plan design or the treatment of medical debt are among several factors that may contribute to observed results; if declines in cost sharing repayment continue, hospitals and clinicians may increasingly seek payment of cost sharing ahead of service, when allowable.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 8","pages":"e252284"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334956/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Patient cost sharing liability has risen in recent years, increasing the costs associated with care for patient households and imposing collections challenges for hospitals and clinicians.

Objective: To measure patient repayment of cost sharing over recent years, and how that varies across patient, hospital, and service characteristics.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study of billing and payment data from a revenue cycle management company examined patient accounts at 217 US hospitals from 2018 to 2024. Participants included 24.5 million and 6.2 million patient episodes of care with positive patient out-of-pocket liability for individuals with private insurance and Medicare Advantage, respectively.

Main outcomes and measures: Percentage of owed patient cost sharing actually paid among patients with private insurance and Medicare Advantage measured over time, for inpatient and outpatient care and by bill size.

Results: Across the full sample of 217 US hospitals (30.7 million patient episodes), mean (SD) patient liability per person, including those with no liability, was higher for individuals with private insurance ($375.41 [$51.55]) than those with Medicare Advantage ($172.50 [$14.84]). Consistent with high-deductible plan design with annual resetting, mean patient liability was higher for visits in January than December, particularly among the privately insured (eg, mean [SD] patient liability for visits among the privately insured in January: $479.44 [$29.21] vs December: $321.63 [$14.29]). Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (January 2018-February 2020), mean repayment rates were 53.9% and 54.0% for patients with private or Medicare Advantage insurance, respectively, and repayment rates declined in more recent years. Across the entire sample, patients with private or Medicare Advantage insurance paid either 0% or 100% of their owed cost sharing in 92.2% and 94.1% of cases, respectively. Repayment rates varied by bill size with lower repayment rates on the largest bills and the smallest bills, and higher repayment rates on midsized bills.

Conclusions and relevance: This cross-sectional study found that patient cost sharing repayments were incomplete and have fallen in more recent years, which result in both medical debts for patients and collections shortfalls for hospitals and clinicians. These findings suggest that changes to insurance plan design or the treatment of medical debt are among several factors that may contribute to observed results; if declines in cost sharing repayment continue, hospitals and clinicians may increasingly seek payment of cost sharing ahead of service, when allowable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

2018年至2024年美国医院账单的患者偿还。
重要性:近年来,患者费用分担责任有所上升,增加了与患者家庭护理相关的成本,并给医院和临床医生带来了收款方面的挑战。目的:衡量近年来患者对费用分担的偿还情况,以及患者、医院和服务特征之间的差异。设计、设置和参与者:这项来自一家收入周期管理公司的账单和支付数据的横断面研究检查了2018年至2024年美国217家医院的患者账户。参与者包括2450万和620万患者,他们分别有私人保险和医疗保险优惠。主要结果和衡量标准:根据住院和门诊护理以及账单金额,在私人保险和医疗保险优势患者中实际支付的欠病人费用分担百分比。结果:在217家美国医院(3070万例患者发作)的全部样本中,拥有私人保险的个体(375.41美元[51.55美元])的人均患者责任(SD)高于拥有医疗保险优势的个体(172.50美元[14.84美元])。与每年重置的高免赔额计划设计一致,1月份就诊的平均患者责任高于12月份,特别是在私人参保人群中(例如,1月份私人参保人群就诊的平均患者责任为479.44美元[29.21美元],而12月份为321.63美元[14.29美元])。在2019冠状病毒病大流行之前(2018年1月至2020年2月),私人或医疗保险优势患者的平均还款率分别为53.9%和54.0%,近年来还款率有所下降。在整个样本中,分别有92.2%和94.1%的私人或医疗保险优惠患者支付了0%或100%的欠款分摊。还款率因票据大小而异,最大票据和最小票据的还款率较低,中型票据的还款率较高。结论和相关性:本横断面研究发现,患者成本分担偿还不完整,近年来有所下降,这导致患者的医疗债务和医院和临床医生的收款不足。这些发现表明,保险计划设计的变化或医疗债务的处理是可能导致观察结果的几个因素之一;如果费用分摊偿还继续下降,医院和临床医生可能会在允许的情况下,越来越多地寻求在服务之前支付费用分摊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信