Evidence of internal structure validity of the nursing outcome "Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Response: Adult (0412)" for critically ill COVID-19 patients.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Aline Batista Maurício, Viviane Martins da Silva, Agueda Maria Ruiz Zimmer Cavalcante, Larissa Giardini Bruni, Sue Ann Moorhead, Elizabeth Swanson, Karen Dunn Lopez, Marcos Venícios de Oliveira Lopes, Alba Lucia Bottura Leite de Barros
{"title":"Evidence of internal structure validity of the nursing outcome \"Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Response: Adult (0412)\" for critically ill COVID-19 patients.","authors":"Aline Batista Maurício, Viviane Martins da Silva, Agueda Maria Ruiz Zimmer Cavalcante, Larissa Giardini Bruni, Sue Ann Moorhead, Elizabeth Swanson, Karen Dunn Lopez, Marcos Venícios de Oliveira Lopes, Alba Lucia Bottura Leite de Barros","doi":"10.1111/2047-3095.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the evidence of internal structure validity of the nursing outcome (NO) \"Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Response: Adult (0412)\" of the NOs classification for critically ill COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A methodological study focused on internal structural validation, part of a multicenter study, was carried out in the intensive care units of two hospitals in Brazil, from 2020 to 2021. Patients in critical condition due to COVID-19 subjected to mechanical ventilation for more than 24 h and with an invasive device attached to the ventilator in the final phase of the weaning process were evaluated. The researchers used an instrument containing sociodemographic and clinical data and a physical examination of the clinical conditions based on the indicators of the NO. An exploratory factor analysis was performed, using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin method, in addition to other additional adjustment indexes. Reliability was assessed using McDonald's omega, Cronbach's alpha, and Gutmann's lambda 6 coefficients.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among the 20 indicators evaluated, 6 were included in the final structure organized into two factors, the first being composed of spontaneous respiratory rhythm, spontaneous respiratory depth, discomfort, and difficulty breathing on own, and the second of anxiety and fear. This two-dimensional structure explains about 62.9% of the total variance. The final structure showed good internal consistency, suggesting that the indicators were measuring the same construct.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The structure proposed for the NO was shown to be reliable and valid for practice and research to evaluate patients with COVID-19 in the final phase of ventilatory weaning.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing practice: </strong>The findings are expected to provide robust evidence for clinical nursing practice. The proposal to organize this NO into dimensions could facilitate the nurse's clinical reasoning and make the monitoring of indicators more organized and faster for the evaluation of patients in ventilatory weaning.</p>","PeriodicalId":49051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.70020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the evidence of internal structure validity of the nursing outcome (NO) "Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Response: Adult (0412)" of the NOs classification for critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Methods: A methodological study focused on internal structural validation, part of a multicenter study, was carried out in the intensive care units of two hospitals in Brazil, from 2020 to 2021. Patients in critical condition due to COVID-19 subjected to mechanical ventilation for more than 24 h and with an invasive device attached to the ventilator in the final phase of the weaning process were evaluated. The researchers used an instrument containing sociodemographic and clinical data and a physical examination of the clinical conditions based on the indicators of the NO. An exploratory factor analysis was performed, using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin method, in addition to other additional adjustment indexes. Reliability was assessed using McDonald's omega, Cronbach's alpha, and Gutmann's lambda 6 coefficients.

Findings: Among the 20 indicators evaluated, 6 were included in the final structure organized into two factors, the first being composed of spontaneous respiratory rhythm, spontaneous respiratory depth, discomfort, and difficulty breathing on own, and the second of anxiety and fear. This two-dimensional structure explains about 62.9% of the total variance. The final structure showed good internal consistency, suggesting that the indicators were measuring the same construct.

Conclusions: The structure proposed for the NO was shown to be reliable and valid for practice and research to evaluate patients with COVID-19 in the final phase of ventilatory weaning.

Implications for nursing practice: The findings are expected to provide robust evidence for clinical nursing practice. The proposal to organize this NO into dimensions could facilitate the nurse's clinical reasoning and make the monitoring of indicators more organized and faster for the evaluation of patients in ventilatory weaning.

COVID-19危重症患者护理结局“机械通气脱机反应:成人(0412)”的内部结构效度证据
目的:评价护理结局(NO)内部结构效度的证据。COVID-19危重症患者NOs分类“机械通气脱机反应:成人(0412)”方法:从2020年到2021年,在巴西两家医院的重症监护病房进行了一项侧重于内部结构验证的方法学研究,这是一项多中心研究的一部分。对COVID-19危重患者进行机械通气超过24小时,并在脱机过程的最后阶段使用有创设备连接呼吸机进行评估。研究人员使用了一种包含社会人口学和临床数据的工具,并根据NO指标对临床状况进行了体检。采用Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin法进行探索性因素分析,并采用其他附加调整指标。使用McDonald's ω、Cronbach's alpha和Gutmann's lambda 6系数来评估可靠性。结果:在评估的20项指标中,有6项被纳入最终结构,最终结构分为两个因素,第一个因素由自主呼吸节奏、自主呼吸深度、不适和自主呼吸困难组成,第二个因素由焦虑和恐惧组成。这种二维结构解释了总方差的62.9%。最终的结构显示出良好的内部一致性,表明这些指标测量的是相同的结构。结论:所提出的NO结构可靠、有效,可用于临床和研究中对COVID-19患者进行最后阶段的通气脱机评估。对护理实践的启示:研究结果有望为临床护理实践提供有力的证据。将该NO组织成维度的建议,有利于护士的临床推理,使各项指标的监测更有组织、更快捷,便于对通气脱机患者进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, the official journal of NANDA International, is a peer-reviewed publication for key professionals committed to discovering, understanding and disseminating nursing knowledge. The Journal aims to clarify the knowledge base of nursing and improve patient safety by developing and disseminating nursing diagnoses and standardized nursing languages, and promoting their clinical use. It seeks to encourage education in clinical reasoning, diagnosis, and assessment and ensure global consistency in conceptual languages. The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge is an essential information resource for healthcare professionals concerned with developing nursing knowledge and /or clinical applications of standardized nursing languages in nursing research, education, practice, and policy. The Journal accepts papers which contribute significantly to international nursing knowledge, including concept analyses, original and applied research, review articles and international and historical perspectives, and welcomes articles discussing clinical challenges and guidelines, education initiatives, and policy initiatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信