Evaluating video capsule endoscopy in diabetes mellitus: transit times, preparation adequacy, and the influence of insulin and GLP-1 receptor agonist use.
{"title":"Evaluating video capsule endoscopy in diabetes mellitus: transit times, preparation adequacy, and the influence of insulin and GLP-1 receptor agonist use.","authors":"Nimrod Akerman, Naomi Fliss-Isakov, Tamar Thurm, Mati Shnell, Yael Sofer, Oren Shibolet, Liat Deutsch","doi":"10.1177/26317745251359459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delayed gastrointestinal transit time (TT), frequently observed in diabetes mellitus (DM), may hinder bowel preparation quality and visualization in video capsule endoscopy (VCE).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aim was to compare VCE preparation adequacy and completion rates between patients with and without DM.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database, including all consecutive VCEs performed in patients aged ⩾35 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were divided into two groups based on a DM diagnosis reported at admission and confirmed by medication records. Clinico-demographic characteristics, bowel preparation quality, TTs, and completion rates were compared between the groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 672 included VCEs, 189 (28.1%) patients had DM and 483 (71.9%) were controls. Completion rates were comparable (DM-98.4% vs controls-99.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.553). Gastric TT was similar (DM-37.5 ± 45.5 vs controls-34.3± 48.6 min, <i>p</i> = 0.420), while small bowel TT was longer (DM-261.8 ± 95.6 vs controls-244.9 ± 98.4 min, <i>p</i> = 0.040). DM patients had higher inadequate preparation rates (31.2% vs controls-23.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.040). In a multivariate analysis adjusted for age and gender, DM was not independently associated with inadequate preparation. However, DM treated with insulin (26.5% of patients with DM) was significantly associated with inadequate bowel preparation (Odds ratio (OR) 2.355, <i>p</i> = 0.006). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist usage (11.8% of patients with DM patients) compared to no-DM controls achieved borderline significance as a risk factor for preparation inadequacy (OR 2.148, 95% CI 0.887-5.201, <i>p</i> = 0.090).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VCE appears to be feasible in patients with DM, with similar completion rates and gastric TTs despite slightly prolonged small bowel TTs. However, DM treated with insulin is a significant risk factor for inadequate bowel preparation, suggesting the need for a more intensive preparation protocol within this patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":40947,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"18 ","pages":"26317745251359459"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12329204/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317745251359459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Delayed gastrointestinal transit time (TT), frequently observed in diabetes mellitus (DM), may hinder bowel preparation quality and visualization in video capsule endoscopy (VCE).
Objectives: The study aim was to compare VCE preparation adequacy and completion rates between patients with and without DM.
Design: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database, including all consecutive VCEs performed in patients aged ⩾35 years.
Methods: Patients were divided into two groups based on a DM diagnosis reported at admission and confirmed by medication records. Clinico-demographic characteristics, bowel preparation quality, TTs, and completion rates were compared between the groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation.
Results: Out of 672 included VCEs, 189 (28.1%) patients had DM and 483 (71.9%) were controls. Completion rates were comparable (DM-98.4% vs controls-99.0%, p = 0.553). Gastric TT was similar (DM-37.5 ± 45.5 vs controls-34.3± 48.6 min, p = 0.420), while small bowel TT was longer (DM-261.8 ± 95.6 vs controls-244.9 ± 98.4 min, p = 0.040). DM patients had higher inadequate preparation rates (31.2% vs controls-23.4%, p = 0.040). In a multivariate analysis adjusted for age and gender, DM was not independently associated with inadequate preparation. However, DM treated with insulin (26.5% of patients with DM) was significantly associated with inadequate bowel preparation (Odds ratio (OR) 2.355, p = 0.006). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist usage (11.8% of patients with DM patients) compared to no-DM controls achieved borderline significance as a risk factor for preparation inadequacy (OR 2.148, 95% CI 0.887-5.201, p = 0.090).
Conclusion: VCE appears to be feasible in patients with DM, with similar completion rates and gastric TTs despite slightly prolonged small bowel TTs. However, DM treated with insulin is a significant risk factor for inadequate bowel preparation, suggesting the need for a more intensive preparation protocol within this patient group.