Psychological resilience among emergency medical teams in Singapore.

IF 1.1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Western Pacific Surveillance and Response Pub Date : 2025-07-28 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.5365/wpsar.2025.16.3.1180
Eunice Chan Chee Yun, Jacqueline Tan Chieh Ling, Teng Kuan Peng David, Quah Li Juan Joy, Lee Chan Yu Jimmy, Yeo Yi Wen Mathew, Pek Jen Heng
{"title":"Psychological resilience among emergency medical teams in Singapore.","authors":"Eunice Chan Chee Yun, Jacqueline Tan Chieh Ling, Teng Kuan Peng David, Quah Li Juan Joy, Lee Chan Yu Jimmy, Yeo Yi Wen Mathew, Pek Jen Heng","doi":"10.5365/wpsar.2025.16.3.1180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Problem: </strong>Emergency medical teams (EMTs) responding to mass casualty incidents attend to casualties in a chaotic, high-pressure and resource-limited environment that is vastly different from their day-to-day work. The nature of mass casualty incidents and the work environment can impact psychological resilience, but the psychological resilience of members of EMTs has not been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Context: </strong>In Singapore, EMTs are deployed from public hospitals, polyclinics and the Singapore Red Cross to disaster sites, where they triage, stabilize and treat casualties before evacuating them to public hospitals for further management.</p><p><strong>Action: </strong>Twenty-four members of EMTs responded to a cross-sectional survey based on a psychological resilience tool developed for health-care rescuers involved in mass casualty incidents to evaluate their psychological resilience after a full-scale exercise involving an aviation accident. Respondents completed a psychological resilience tool that was developed by experts in disaster work and research using a modified Delphi approach. There were 27 items across eight domains: optimism, altruism, preparations for disaster rescue, social support, perceived control, self-efficacy, coping strategies and positive growth.</p><p><strong>Outcome: </strong>The key observations from the survey were that (i) staff demonstrated a strong sense of altruism and had good social support; (ii) staff were not confident about their preparedness, and this led to a lack of optimism, perceived control and ability to deal with emotions; and (iii) it was necessary for respondents to reflect on their experience to find meaning to support growth after the deployment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Optimizing casualty survival and outcomes during mass casualty incidents requires not only excellent procedural training and robust standard operating procedures and work processes but also dedicated efforts to enhance the psychological resilience of members of EMTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":31512,"journal":{"name":"Western Pacific Surveillance and Response","volume":"16 3","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12325166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Pacific Surveillance and Response","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5365/wpsar.2025.16.3.1180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem: Emergency medical teams (EMTs) responding to mass casualty incidents attend to casualties in a chaotic, high-pressure and resource-limited environment that is vastly different from their day-to-day work. The nature of mass casualty incidents and the work environment can impact psychological resilience, but the psychological resilience of members of EMTs has not been evaluated.

Context: In Singapore, EMTs are deployed from public hospitals, polyclinics and the Singapore Red Cross to disaster sites, where they triage, stabilize and treat casualties before evacuating them to public hospitals for further management.

Action: Twenty-four members of EMTs responded to a cross-sectional survey based on a psychological resilience tool developed for health-care rescuers involved in mass casualty incidents to evaluate their psychological resilience after a full-scale exercise involving an aviation accident. Respondents completed a psychological resilience tool that was developed by experts in disaster work and research using a modified Delphi approach. There were 27 items across eight domains: optimism, altruism, preparations for disaster rescue, social support, perceived control, self-efficacy, coping strategies and positive growth.

Outcome: The key observations from the survey were that (i) staff demonstrated a strong sense of altruism and had good social support; (ii) staff were not confident about their preparedness, and this led to a lack of optimism, perceived control and ability to deal with emotions; and (iii) it was necessary for respondents to reflect on their experience to find meaning to support growth after the deployment.

Discussion: Optimizing casualty survival and outcomes during mass casualty incidents requires not only excellent procedural training and robust standard operating procedures and work processes but also dedicated efforts to enhance the psychological resilience of members of EMTs.

新加坡紧急医疗团队的心理弹性。
问题:应对大规模伤亡事件的紧急医疗队(emt)在混乱、高压和资源有限的环境中处理伤亡,这与他们的日常工作大不相同。大规模伤亡事件的性质和工作环境会影响急救人员的心理弹性,但尚未对急救人员的心理弹性进行评估。背景:在新加坡,急诊医生从公立医院、综合诊所和新加坡红十字会部署到灾害现场,在那里对伤员进行分类、稳定和治疗,然后将他们送往公立医院进行进一步管理。行动:24名急救医生成员对一项横断面调查作出了答复,该调查基于一项为参与大规模伤亡事件的保健救援人员开发的心理复原力工具,以评估他们在一次涉及航空事故的全面演习后的心理复原力。受访者完成了一个心理弹性工具,该工具是由灾害工作和研究专家使用改进的德尔菲方法开发的。乐观主义、利他主义、灾难救援准备、社会支持、感知控制、自我效能、应对策略和积极成长8个领域共27个项目。结果:调查的主要观察结果是:(i)工作人员表现出强烈的利他意识和良好的社会支持;工作人员对自己的准备工作没有信心,这导致缺乏乐观情绪、感觉上的控制和处理情绪的能力;(三)受访者有必要反思他们的经验,以找到部署后支持增长的意义。讨论:在大规模伤亡事件中,优化伤亡者的生存和结果,不仅需要出色的程序培训和健全的标准操作程序和工作流程,还需要努力提高急救人员的心理弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Pacific Surveillance and Response
Western Pacific Surveillance and Response PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信