Non-invasive goal-directed fluid therapy with the pleth variability index (PVI): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Vitor Alves Felippe, Roberta Codeceira, Maria Irigaray, Maria Sckaff, Bruno Wegner, Tatiana Nascimento, Carlos Darcy, Lucas Dutra, Bruno Santiago, Julia Buchmann, Marcos Adriano Lessa
{"title":"Non-invasive goal-directed fluid therapy with the pleth variability index (PVI): a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Vitor Alves Felippe, Roberta Codeceira, Maria Irigaray, Maria Sckaff, Bruno Wegner, Tatiana Nascimento, Carlos Darcy, Lucas Dutra, Bruno Santiago, Julia Buchmann, Marcos Adriano Lessa","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01334-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Optimal intraoperative fluid management is essential to improve surgical outcomes and reduce complications. The Pleth Variability Index (PVI), a dynamic and non-invasive indicator of fluid responsiveness, has been proposed as a tool for goal-directed fluid management. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PVI-guided fluid therapy compared to conventional fluid management (CFM) in non-cardiac surgeries. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to January 2024 identified eligible studies. Primary outcomes included total intraoperative fluid volume and crystalloid administration. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic parameters, renal function markers, acid-base balance, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Random-effects models were applied, and subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. Nine studies comprising 1,105 patients were included. Compared to conventional fluid management, PVI-guided therapy significantly reduced total fluid volume (mean difference [MD] - 761.23 mL; 95% CI - 1267.42 to - 255.03) and crystalloid administration (MD - 655.05 mL; 95% CI - 1096.48 to - 213.62), without significant differences in colloid use, urine output, norepinephrine requirement, arterial pressure, acid-base balance, or LOS. Subgroup analysis of abdominal surgeries confirmed the observed reduction in fluid volumes. PVI-guided fluid management allows for a more restrictive and individualized approach without compromising hemodynamic or metabolic stability. While the heterogeneity across studies limits generalizability, these findings support the clinical value of PVI as a non-invasive tool for perioperative fluid optimization, especially in settings where invasive monitoring is not feasible. Further trials are needed to evaluate its impact on long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"917-927"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474725/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01334-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimal intraoperative fluid management is essential to improve surgical outcomes and reduce complications. The Pleth Variability Index (PVI), a dynamic and non-invasive indicator of fluid responsiveness, has been proposed as a tool for goal-directed fluid management. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PVI-guided fluid therapy compared to conventional fluid management (CFM) in non-cardiac surgeries. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to January 2024 identified eligible studies. Primary outcomes included total intraoperative fluid volume and crystalloid administration. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic parameters, renal function markers, acid-base balance, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Random-effects models were applied, and subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. Nine studies comprising 1,105 patients were included. Compared to conventional fluid management, PVI-guided therapy significantly reduced total fluid volume (mean difference [MD] - 761.23 mL; 95% CI - 1267.42 to - 255.03) and crystalloid administration (MD - 655.05 mL; 95% CI - 1096.48 to - 213.62), without significant differences in colloid use, urine output, norepinephrine requirement, arterial pressure, acid-base balance, or LOS. Subgroup analysis of abdominal surgeries confirmed the observed reduction in fluid volumes. PVI-guided fluid management allows for a more restrictive and individualized approach without compromising hemodynamic or metabolic stability. While the heterogeneity across studies limits generalizability, these findings support the clinical value of PVI as a non-invasive tool for perioperative fluid optimization, especially in settings where invasive monitoring is not feasible. Further trials are needed to evaluate its impact on long-term outcomes.

无创目标导向液体治疗与容积变异性指数(PVI):系统回顾和荟萃分析。
最佳术中液体管理对于改善手术效果和减少并发症至关重要。体积变异性指数(PVI)是一种动态的、非侵入性的流体反应性指标,已被提出作为目标导向流体管理的工具。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估pvi引导的液体治疗与传统液体管理(CFM)在非心脏手术中的有效性。全面检索PubMed, Embase和Cochrane数据库,直到2024年1月确定了符合条件的研究。主要结果包括术中总液量和晶体给药。次要结局包括血流动力学参数、肾功能指标、酸碱平衡和住院时间(LOS)。采用随机效应模型,进行亚组分析和敏感性分析。纳入了9项研究,共1105例患者。与常规液体处理相比,pvi引导治疗显著降低了总液体体积(平均差[MD] - 761.23 mL;95% CI - 1267.42至- 255.03)和晶体给药(MD - 655.05 mL;95% CI - 1096.48至- 213.62),在胶体使用、尿量、去甲肾上腺素需求、动脉压、酸碱平衡或LOS方面无显著差异。腹部手术的亚组分析证实了观察到的液体量减少。pvi引导的流体管理允许更严格和个性化的方法,而不影响血液动力学或代谢稳定性。虽然各研究的异质性限制了通用性,但这些发现支持PVI作为围手术期液体优化的非侵入性工具的临床价值,特别是在侵入性监测不可行的情况下。需要进一步的试验来评估其对长期结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信