Chronic pain and long-term disability following postdural puncture headache in obstetric patients: a five-year prospective follow-up of a case-control cohort.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
A Weiss, A Ioscovich, M Heesen, A Frenkel, D Shatalin, Y Gozal, S Orbach-Zinger, Y Binyamin
{"title":"Chronic pain and long-term disability following postdural puncture headache in obstetric patients: a five-year prospective follow-up of a case-control cohort.","authors":"A Weiss, A Ioscovich, M Heesen, A Frenkel, D Shatalin, Y Gozal, S Orbach-Zinger, Y Binyamin","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unintended dural puncture is a recognized complication of neuraxial labor analgesia and has been associated with postdural puncture headache (PDPH). While short-term outcomes are well documented, long-term consequences remain poorly characterized. No previous study has reported follow-up beyond two years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective case-control study followed 336 women up to five years after delivery. The cohort comprised 113 women who delivered without labor epidural analgesia, 113 women who delivered with uncomplicated labor epidural analgesia, 54 women with PDPH following an unintended dural puncture who were not treated with an epidural blood patch, and 56 women with PDPH following an unintended dural puncture who were treated with an epidural blood patch. Outcomes included the prevalence of chronic headache and backache assessed through standardized telephone questionnaires based on International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria, as well as functional impact over time evaluated using the Von Korff chronic pain grade questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At five years, chronic headache was significantly more common in the two PDPH groups (20.4% with an epidural blood patch and 21.4% without) than in the control groups (5.3% with an uncomplicated epidural procedure and 0.9% without labor epidural; P <0.01). Chronic backache showed a similar pattern (20.8% and 16.1% vs. 5.3% and 0.9%, respectively; P <0.01). Most women reported persistent rather than resolving symptoms. Functional impairment increased over time, with high disability reported in 7 of 16 women (43.8%) with PDPH without an epidural blood patch and 4 of 14 women (28.6%) with PDPH with an epidural blood patch, who reported chronic pain at five years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This five-years follow-up study demonstrates that chronic pain (headache and backache) after an unintended dural puncture is a prolonged condition with substantial functional consequences, challenging its traditional characterization as a transient complication and underscoring the need for long-term follow-up and prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"64 ","pages":"104747"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104747","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Unintended dural puncture is a recognized complication of neuraxial labor analgesia and has been associated with postdural puncture headache (PDPH). While short-term outcomes are well documented, long-term consequences remain poorly characterized. No previous study has reported follow-up beyond two years.

Methods: This prospective case-control study followed 336 women up to five years after delivery. The cohort comprised 113 women who delivered without labor epidural analgesia, 113 women who delivered with uncomplicated labor epidural analgesia, 54 women with PDPH following an unintended dural puncture who were not treated with an epidural blood patch, and 56 women with PDPH following an unintended dural puncture who were treated with an epidural blood patch. Outcomes included the prevalence of chronic headache and backache assessed through standardized telephone questionnaires based on International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria, as well as functional impact over time evaluated using the Von Korff chronic pain grade questionnaire.

Results: At five years, chronic headache was significantly more common in the two PDPH groups (20.4% with an epidural blood patch and 21.4% without) than in the control groups (5.3% with an uncomplicated epidural procedure and 0.9% without labor epidural; P <0.01). Chronic backache showed a similar pattern (20.8% and 16.1% vs. 5.3% and 0.9%, respectively; P <0.01). Most women reported persistent rather than resolving symptoms. Functional impairment increased over time, with high disability reported in 7 of 16 women (43.8%) with PDPH without an epidural blood patch and 4 of 14 women (28.6%) with PDPH with an epidural blood patch, who reported chronic pain at five years.

Conclusions: This five-years follow-up study demonstrates that chronic pain (headache and backache) after an unintended dural puncture is a prolonged condition with substantial functional consequences, challenging its traditional characterization as a transient complication and underscoring the need for long-term follow-up and prevention.

产科患者硬脊膜后穿刺头痛后的慢性疼痛和长期残疾:病例对照队列的5年前瞻性随访。
背景:意外硬脊膜穿刺是神经轴分娩镇痛的一种公认的并发症,并与硬脊膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)有关。虽然短期结果有充分的记录,但长期后果仍不清楚。此前没有研究报告随访超过两年。方法:这项前瞻性病例对照研究对336名妇女进行了随访,随访时间长达5年。该队列包括113名无分娩硬膜外镇痛分娩的妇女,113名无并发症硬膜外镇痛分娩的妇女,54名在意外硬膜穿刺后出现PDPH的妇女,未采用硬膜外血贴治疗,56名在意外硬膜穿刺后出现PDPH的妇女,采用硬膜外血贴治疗。结果包括通过基于国际头痛疾病分类标准的标准化电话问卷评估慢性头痛和背痛的患病率,以及使用Von Korff慢性疼痛分级问卷评估随时间的功能影响。结果:5岁时,慢性头痛在两个PDPH组中(20.4%有硬膜外血贴,21.4%没有)明显高于对照组(5.3%有简单硬膜外手术,0.9%没有硬膜外分娩;结论:这项为期五年的随访研究表明,意外硬脑膜穿刺后的慢性疼痛(头痛和背痛)是一种长期的疾病,具有实质性的功能后果,挑战了其作为一种短暂并发症的传统特征,强调了长期随访和预防的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient. • Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered. • The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia. • Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome. The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信