Determinants of consent for electronic health information exchange: an observational retrospective study.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Jelle Keuper, Karin Hek, Lilian H D van Tuyl, Ronald Batenburg, Robert Verheij
{"title":"Determinants of consent for electronic health information exchange: an observational retrospective study.","authors":"Jelle Keuper, Karin Hek, Lilian H D van Tuyl, Ronald Batenburg, Robert Verheij","doi":"10.1186/s12961-025-01377-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sharing of patient electronic health record (EHR) data between healthcare providers can enhance quality and efficiency of healthcare provision, and patient safety. Health information exchange is allowed only with explicit patient consent. In the Netherlands, patient consent and the exchange of information is organized nationally. Consent status is recorded routinely in general practice EHRs. This study examines how various characteristics at the individual and general practice level influence this consent for electronic health information exchange (HIE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Routine EHR data from general practices and out-of-hours primary care services participating in the Nivel Primary Care Database were analysed for the period 2017-2019, just before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic outbreak. Bivariate chi-squared test analysis and multilevel logistic regression analysis, adjusted for practice-level clustering, were conducted for each of the 3 observed years to assess whether consent for electronic HIE (\"yes\" or \"no\") was associated with the individual's health and healthcare utilization, demographics, neighbourhood characteristics (socioeconomic position, degree of urbanization, area deprivation), and general practice characteristics (practice type, EHR system, practice size).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2017 and 2019, 38-45% of the individuals provided consent for electronic HIE. Individuals with a higher number of different prescriptions or those with long-lasting health problems or chronic diseases had lower odds of providing consent, in each of the 3 years. This result also applied to female and older individuals (aged ≥ 65 years). In contrast, individuals from below-average socioeconomic position neighbourhoods living in deprived urban or hardly urbanized regions generally had higher odds of providing consent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In contrast to what was expected, patient groups with higher healthcare utilization were less, or as likely to provide consent for HIE compared with individuals with no or lower healthcare utilization. This implies that the population most likely to benefit from HIE is, in fact, less likely to profit from it. Further research is needed to determine whether these differences arise from individual trust, privacy concerns, transparency issues or other factors such as physicians' HIE beliefs. Optimizing the national HIE system in the Netherlands requires considering multiple influencing factors, on both the individual level and practice level.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":"103"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01377-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sharing of patient electronic health record (EHR) data between healthcare providers can enhance quality and efficiency of healthcare provision, and patient safety. Health information exchange is allowed only with explicit patient consent. In the Netherlands, patient consent and the exchange of information is organized nationally. Consent status is recorded routinely in general practice EHRs. This study examines how various characteristics at the individual and general practice level influence this consent for electronic health information exchange (HIE).

Methods: Routine EHR data from general practices and out-of-hours primary care services participating in the Nivel Primary Care Database were analysed for the period 2017-2019, just before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic outbreak. Bivariate chi-squared test analysis and multilevel logistic regression analysis, adjusted for practice-level clustering, were conducted for each of the 3 observed years to assess whether consent for electronic HIE ("yes" or "no") was associated with the individual's health and healthcare utilization, demographics, neighbourhood characteristics (socioeconomic position, degree of urbanization, area deprivation), and general practice characteristics (practice type, EHR system, practice size).

Results: Between 2017 and 2019, 38-45% of the individuals provided consent for electronic HIE. Individuals with a higher number of different prescriptions or those with long-lasting health problems or chronic diseases had lower odds of providing consent, in each of the 3 years. This result also applied to female and older individuals (aged ≥ 65 years). In contrast, individuals from below-average socioeconomic position neighbourhoods living in deprived urban or hardly urbanized regions generally had higher odds of providing consent.

Conclusions: In contrast to what was expected, patient groups with higher healthcare utilization were less, or as likely to provide consent for HIE compared with individuals with no or lower healthcare utilization. This implies that the population most likely to benefit from HIE is, in fact, less likely to profit from it. Further research is needed to determine whether these differences arise from individual trust, privacy concerns, transparency issues or other factors such as physicians' HIE beliefs. Optimizing the national HIE system in the Netherlands requires considering multiple influencing factors, on both the individual level and practice level.

同意电子健康信息交换的决定因素:一项观察性回顾性研究。
背景:在医疗保健提供者之间共享患者电子健康记录(EHR)数据可以提高医疗保健提供的质量和效率,以及患者安全。只有在患者明确同意的情况下,才允许交换健康信息。在荷兰,病人同意和信息交流是在全国范围内组织的。同意状态是常规记录在一般做法的电子病历。本研究考察了个人和一般实践层面的各种特征如何影响电子健康信息交换(HIE)的同意。方法:分析2017-2019年(2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行爆发前)参与Nivel初级保健数据库的全科医生和非工作时间初级保健服务的常规电子病历数据。在观察的3年中,每年进行双变量卡方检验分析和多水平逻辑回归分析,调整实践水平聚类,以评估电子HIE的同意(“是”或“否”)是否与个人健康和医疗保健利用、人口统计学、社区特征(社会经济地位、城市化程度、面积剥夺)和一般实践特征(实践类型、EHR系统、实践规模)相关。结果:2017年至2019年期间,38-45%的个人同意电子HIE。在这3年中,不同处方数量较多的人或有长期健康问题或慢性疾病的人表示同意的几率较低。这一结果也适用于女性和老年人(年龄≥65岁)。相比之下,生活在贫困城市或几乎没有城市化地区的社会经济地位低于平均水平的人通常有更高的几率表示同意。结论:与预期相反,与没有或较低医疗保健利用率的个体相比,医疗保健利用率较高的患者组更少或更可能同意HIE。这意味着最有可能从HIE中受益的人群实际上不太可能从中受益。需要进一步的研究来确定这些差异是否来自个人信任、隐私问题、透明度问题或其他因素,如医生的HIE信念。荷兰国家HIE系统的优化需要考虑多方面的影响因素,包括个人层面和实践层面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信