Wedge fragments: no significant impact on bone healing in femoral shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Yong-Cheol Yoon, Myung Jin Jang, Jigang Jeun, Hyung Keun Song
{"title":"Wedge fragments: no significant impact on bone healing in femoral shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing.","authors":"Yong-Cheol Yoon, Myung Jin Jang, Jigang Jeun, Hyung Keun Song","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-06020-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intramedullary nailing (IMN) is the treatment of choice for femoral shaft fractures with wedge-shaped fragments. However, the management of wedged fragments remains controversial. This study investigated whether wedged fragments affect bone union rates in patients treated with IMN. The primary hypothesis was that wedged fragments would not significantly affect bone union when proper IMN principles were followed.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between March 2014 and June 2023, 162 patients were diagnosed with femoral shaft fractures (AO/OTA 32-B type) accompanied by wedge fractures. The surgeries involved the use of a reconstruction antegrade nail with a greater trochanteric entry point. Closed reduction was performed, and recon-type screws were used for proximal fixation of the femoral neck and head and at least two screws distally. The wedged fragments were not manipulated further. We analyzed the characteristics of the wedged fragments, including size, displacement, angle, and reversal morphology, and assessed the main fracture gap size in relation to bone union outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 95 of the 162 patients, of whom 82 (86.3%) achieved bone union and 13 (13.7%) experienced nonunion. Demographic and preoperative variables showed no significant differences between the union and nonunion groups. Postoperative radiographic analysis of the wedged fragments revealed no significant differences in fragment size, angle, displacement, or presence of reversed fragments. However, the main fracture gap size significantly differed, averaging 5.2 mm in the union group and 15.6 mm in the nonunion group(p = 0.01). Complications included superficial infections in four patients and malrotation in three, which were managed conservatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Wedge fragments in femoral shaft fractures do not significantly affect bone union with IMN. Instead, the size of the main fracture gap is critical for healing. Surgery should focus on stable fixation and minimization of the main fracture gap rather than manipulating the wedged fragments.</p>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":"401"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-025-06020-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intramedullary nailing (IMN) is the treatment of choice for femoral shaft fractures with wedge-shaped fragments. However, the management of wedged fragments remains controversial. This study investigated whether wedged fragments affect bone union rates in patients treated with IMN. The primary hypothesis was that wedged fragments would not significantly affect bone union when proper IMN principles were followed.

Materials and methods: Between March 2014 and June 2023, 162 patients were diagnosed with femoral shaft fractures (AO/OTA 32-B type) accompanied by wedge fractures. The surgeries involved the use of a reconstruction antegrade nail with a greater trochanteric entry point. Closed reduction was performed, and recon-type screws were used for proximal fixation of the femoral neck and head and at least two screws distally. The wedged fragments were not manipulated further. We analyzed the characteristics of the wedged fragments, including size, displacement, angle, and reversal morphology, and assessed the main fracture gap size in relation to bone union outcomes.

Results: The study included 95 of the 162 patients, of whom 82 (86.3%) achieved bone union and 13 (13.7%) experienced nonunion. Demographic and preoperative variables showed no significant differences between the union and nonunion groups. Postoperative radiographic analysis of the wedged fragments revealed no significant differences in fragment size, angle, displacement, or presence of reversed fragments. However, the main fracture gap size significantly differed, averaging 5.2 mm in the union group and 15.6 mm in the nonunion group(p = 0.01). Complications included superficial infections in four patients and malrotation in three, which were managed conservatively.

Conclusions: Wedge fragments in femoral shaft fractures do not significantly affect bone union with IMN. Instead, the size of the main fracture gap is critical for healing. Surgery should focus on stable fixation and minimization of the main fracture gap rather than manipulating the wedged fragments.

楔形碎片:髓内钉治疗股骨干骨折对骨愈合无明显影响。
简介:髓内钉(IMN)是治疗楔形碎片股骨干骨折的首选方法。然而,楔形碎片的处理仍然存在争议。本研究探讨楔形碎片是否会影响IMN患者的骨愈合率。主要假设是楔形碎片不会显著影响骨愈合当适当的IMN原则遵循。材料与方法:2014年3月至2023年6月,162例诊断为股骨干骨折(AO/OTA 32-B型)合并楔形骨折。手术包括使用重建顺行甲与大转子入口点。进行闭合复位,使用recon型螺钉近端固定股骨颈和股骨头,远端至少使用两颗螺钉。楔形碎片没有被进一步处理。我们分析了楔形碎片的特征,包括大小、位移、角度和反转形态,并评估了主要骨折间隙大小与骨愈合结果的关系。结果:本研究纳入162例患者中的95例,其中82例(86.3%)骨愈合,13例(13.7%)骨不愈合。人口统计学和术前变量显示愈合组和不愈合组之间无显著差异。术后楔形碎片的x线分析显示碎片大小、角度、位移或反向碎片的存在没有显著差异。然而,主骨折间隙大小有显著性差异,愈合组平均5.2 mm,不愈合组平均15.6 mm (p = 0.01)。并发症包括4例浅表感染和3例旋转不良,均采用保守治疗。结论:股骨骨干骨折楔形碎片对内固定骨愈合无明显影响。相反,主骨折间隙的大小对愈合至关重要。手术应侧重于稳定固定和尽量减少主要骨折间隙,而不是操纵楔形碎片。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信