Carolyn M Zelop,Jennifer Lam-Rachlin,Alisa Arunamata,Rajesh Punn,Sarina K Behera,Matthias Lachaud,Nadine David,Greggory R DeVore,Andrei Rebarber,Nathan S Fox,Marjorie Gayanilo,Sara Garmel,Philippe Boukobza,Pierre Uzan,Hervé Joly,Romain Girardot,Laurence Cohen,Bertrand Stos,Malo De Boisredon,Eric Askinazi,Valentin Thorey,Christophe Gardella,Marilyne Levy,Miwa Geiger
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence for the Detection of Fetal Ultrasound Findings Concerning for Major Congenital Heart Defects.","authors":"Carolyn M Zelop,Jennifer Lam-Rachlin,Alisa Arunamata,Rajesh Punn,Sarina K Behera,Matthias Lachaud,Nadine David,Greggory R DeVore,Andrei Rebarber,Nathan S Fox,Marjorie Gayanilo,Sara Garmel,Philippe Boukobza,Pierre Uzan,Hervé Joly,Romain Girardot,Laurence Cohen,Bertrand Stos,Malo De Boisredon,Eric Askinazi,Valentin Thorey,Christophe Gardella,Marilyne Levy,Miwa Geiger","doi":"10.1097/aog.0000000000006027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based software to identify second-trimester fetal ultrasound examinations suspicious for congenital heart defects.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe software analyzes all grayscale two-dimensional ultrasound cine clips of an examination to evaluate eight morphologic findings associated with severe congenital heart defects. A data set of 877 examinations was retrospectively collected from 11 centers. The presence of suspicious findings was determined by a panel of expert pediatric cardiologists, who determined that 311 examinations had at least one of the eight suspicious findings. The AI software processed each examination, labeling each finding as present, absent, or inconclusive.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf the 280 examinations with known severe congenital heart defects, 278 (sensitivity 0.993, 95% CI, 0.974-0.998) had at least one of the eight suspicious findings present as determined by the fetal cardiologists, highlighting the relevance of these eight findings. We then evaluated the performance of the AI software, which identified at least one finding as present in 271 examinations, that all eight findings were absent in five examinations, and was inconclusive in four of the 280 examinations with severe congenital heart defects, yielding a sensitivity of 0.968 (95% CI, 0.940-0.983) for severe congenital heart defects. When comparing the AI to the determination of findings by fetal cardiologists, the detection of any finding by the AI had a sensitivity of 0.987 (95% CI, 0.967-0.995) and a specificity of 0.977 (95% CI, 0.961-0.986) after exclusion of inconclusive examinations. The AI rendered a decision for any finding (either present or absent) in 98.7% of examinations.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe AI-based software demonstrated high accuracy in identification of suspicious findings associated with severe congenital heart defects, yielding a high sensitivity for detecting severe congenital heart defects. These results show that AI has potential to improve antenatal congenital heart defect detection.","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"160 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based software to identify second-trimester fetal ultrasound examinations suspicious for congenital heart defects.
METHODS
The software analyzes all grayscale two-dimensional ultrasound cine clips of an examination to evaluate eight morphologic findings associated with severe congenital heart defects. A data set of 877 examinations was retrospectively collected from 11 centers. The presence of suspicious findings was determined by a panel of expert pediatric cardiologists, who determined that 311 examinations had at least one of the eight suspicious findings. The AI software processed each examination, labeling each finding as present, absent, or inconclusive.
RESULTS
Of the 280 examinations with known severe congenital heart defects, 278 (sensitivity 0.993, 95% CI, 0.974-0.998) had at least one of the eight suspicious findings present as determined by the fetal cardiologists, highlighting the relevance of these eight findings. We then evaluated the performance of the AI software, which identified at least one finding as present in 271 examinations, that all eight findings were absent in five examinations, and was inconclusive in four of the 280 examinations with severe congenital heart defects, yielding a sensitivity of 0.968 (95% CI, 0.940-0.983) for severe congenital heart defects. When comparing the AI to the determination of findings by fetal cardiologists, the detection of any finding by the AI had a sensitivity of 0.987 (95% CI, 0.967-0.995) and a specificity of 0.977 (95% CI, 0.961-0.986) after exclusion of inconclusive examinations. The AI rendered a decision for any finding (either present or absent) in 98.7% of examinations.
CONCLUSION
The AI-based software demonstrated high accuracy in identification of suspicious findings associated with severe congenital heart defects, yielding a high sensitivity for detecting severe congenital heart defects. These results show that AI has potential to improve antenatal congenital heart defect detection.
期刊介绍:
"Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics.
"Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.