Impact of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive impairment in stroke patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 1.8
Zhi-Qiang Zhao, Huai-Nan Li, Yun Ye, Jun-Lin Wang, Peng Xu
{"title":"Impact of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive impairment in stroke patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Zhi-Qiang Zhao, Huai-Nan Li, Yun Ye, Jun-Lin Wang, Peng Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2025.108415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cognitive impairment in stroke patients using meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase) were systematically searched up to October 20, 2024. Randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of rTMS on cognitive impairment in stroke patients were included. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using standardized mean differences (SMD) or mean differences (MD) based on fixed or random effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies involving 597 stroke patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that rTMS significantly improved global cognitive function in stroke patients (SMD: 0.54; 95 % CI: 0.28, 0.79), particularly with high-intensity rTMS (SMD: 0.41; 95 % CI: 0.07, 0.76) and intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) (SMD: 0.94; 95 % CI: 0.62, 1.27). In terms of different rating scales, rTMS significantly increased scores on the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) (MD: 10.54; 95 % CI: 4.85, 16.23) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (MD: 1.96; 95 % CI: 0.91, 3.01), while the effects on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test (RBMT), and Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA) were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis confirms that rTMS can effectively improve cognitive function in stroke patients. However, due to the limited number of studies included, further high-quality research is needed to substantiate our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":520692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association","volume":" ","pages":"108415"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2025.108415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cognitive impairment in stroke patients using meta-analysis.

Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase) were systematically searched up to October 20, 2024. Randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of rTMS on cognitive impairment in stroke patients were included. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using standardized mean differences (SMD) or mean differences (MD) based on fixed or random effects models.

Results: Fourteen studies involving 597 stroke patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that rTMS significantly improved global cognitive function in stroke patients (SMD: 0.54; 95 % CI: 0.28, 0.79), particularly with high-intensity rTMS (SMD: 0.41; 95 % CI: 0.07, 0.76) and intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) (SMD: 0.94; 95 % CI: 0.62, 1.27). In terms of different rating scales, rTMS significantly increased scores on the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) (MD: 10.54; 95 % CI: 4.85, 16.23) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (MD: 1.96; 95 % CI: 0.91, 3.01), while the effects on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test (RBMT), and Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA) were not statistically significant.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis confirms that rTMS can effectively improve cognitive function in stroke patients. However, due to the limited number of studies included, further high-quality research is needed to substantiate our findings.

反复经颅磁刺激对脑卒中患者认知功能障碍的影响:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
目的:采用meta分析方法评价重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对脑卒中患者认知功能障碍的影响。方法:系统检索截至2024年10月20日的电子数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library和Embase)。随机对照试验评估rTMS对脑卒中患者认知功能障碍的影响。采用基于固定或随机效应模型的标准化平均差异(SMD)或平均差异(MD)计算合并效应大小。结果:本荟萃分析纳入了14项研究,涉及597例脑卒中患者。结果显示,rTMS可显著改善脑卒中患者的整体认知功能(SMD: 0.54;95% CI: 0.28, 0.79),特别是高强度rTMS (SMD: 0.41;95% CI: 0.07, 0.76)和间歇性脉冲刺激(iTBS) (SMD: 0.94;95% ci: 0.62, 1.27)。在不同评定量表上,rTMS显著提高了修正Barthel指数(MBI)得分(MD: 10.54;95% CI: 4.85, 16.23)和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA) (MD: 1.96;95% CI: 0.91, 3.01),而对迷你精神状态检查(MMSE), Rivermead行为记忆测试(RBMT)和Loewenstein职业治疗认知评估(LOTCA)的影响无统计学意义。结论:本荟萃分析证实rTMS可有效改善脑卒中患者的认知功能。然而,由于纳入的研究数量有限,需要进一步的高质量研究来证实我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书