Perineural dexamethasone: neurotoxicity or neuroprotection? A systematic review of preclinical evidence.

IF 3.1
Alessandro De Cassai, Domenico Pietro Santonastaso, Francesco Coppolino, Cristiano D'Errico, Gabriele Melegari, Burhan Dost, Giulia Aviani Fulvio, Annalisa Boscolo, Rafael Boscolo-Berto, Paolo Navalesi
{"title":"Perineural dexamethasone: neurotoxicity or neuroprotection? A systematic review of preclinical evidence.","authors":"Alessandro De Cassai, Domenico Pietro Santonastaso, Francesco Coppolino, Cristiano D'Errico, Gabriele Melegari, Burhan Dost, Giulia Aviani Fulvio, Annalisa Boscolo, Rafael Boscolo-Berto, Paolo Navalesi","doi":"10.1186/s44158-025-00271-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perineural dexamethasone is widely used as an adjuvant to local anesthetics in regional anesthesia to prolong analgesia. However, concerns persist regarding its potential neurotoxic effects, particularly when administered perineurally. This systematic review aims to synthesize preclinical evidence evaluating the neurotoxicity or neuroprotective properties of perineural dexamethasone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Embase was conducted through May 22, 2025. Eligible studies included in vivo or in vitro preclinical models assessing the neurotoxic or neuroprotective effects of perineural dexamethasone compared to control conditions. Risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE tool for in vivo studies and a narrative evaluation for in vitro studies. A total of 14 studies (11 in vivo, 3 in vitro) met inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In vitro studies showed that dexamethasone alone was not neurotoxic at clinically relevant doses but could enhance cytotoxicity when combined with local anesthetics at higher concentrations. In vivo models generally demonstrated no significant long-term nerve inflammation, degeneration or demyelination, with some early protective effects observed in perineural dexamethasone groups. However, all in vivo studies were rated at high risk of bias. In nerve injury models, dexamethasone reduced apoptotic and inflammatory markers when administered immediately post-injury, with limited effect when delayed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preclinical evidence supports the general safety of low-dose, preservative-free perineural dexamethasone. Nonetheless, high-dose use, additives, and application in patients with neuropathies may pose risks. Given the high risk of bias in existing studies and minimal added benefit over systemic administration, clinical caution is advised.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"5 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12329900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-025-00271-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Perineural dexamethasone is widely used as an adjuvant to local anesthetics in regional anesthesia to prolong analgesia. However, concerns persist regarding its potential neurotoxic effects, particularly when administered perineurally. This systematic review aims to synthesize preclinical evidence evaluating the neurotoxicity or neuroprotective properties of perineural dexamethasone.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Embase was conducted through May 22, 2025. Eligible studies included in vivo or in vitro preclinical models assessing the neurotoxic or neuroprotective effects of perineural dexamethasone compared to control conditions. Risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE tool for in vivo studies and a narrative evaluation for in vitro studies. A total of 14 studies (11 in vivo, 3 in vitro) met inclusion criteria.

Results: In vitro studies showed that dexamethasone alone was not neurotoxic at clinically relevant doses but could enhance cytotoxicity when combined with local anesthetics at higher concentrations. In vivo models generally demonstrated no significant long-term nerve inflammation, degeneration or demyelination, with some early protective effects observed in perineural dexamethasone groups. However, all in vivo studies were rated at high risk of bias. In nerve injury models, dexamethasone reduced apoptotic and inflammatory markers when administered immediately post-injury, with limited effect when delayed.

Conclusions: Preclinical evidence supports the general safety of low-dose, preservative-free perineural dexamethasone. Nonetheless, high-dose use, additives, and application in patients with neuropathies may pose risks. Given the high risk of bias in existing studies and minimal added benefit over systemic administration, clinical caution is advised.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

神经周围地塞米松:神经毒性还是神经保护?临床前证据的系统回顾。
背景:神经周围地塞米松作为局麻药的辅助剂在区域麻醉中广泛应用,以延长镇痛时间。然而,对其潜在的神经毒性作用的关注仍然存在,特别是在神经周围给药时。本系统综述旨在综合评价神经周围地塞米松的神经毒性或神经保护作用的临床前证据。方法:系统检索PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus和Embase,截止到2025年5月22日。符合条件的研究包括体内或体外临床前模型,评估与对照组相比,神经周围地塞米松的神经毒性或神经保护作用。使用体内研究的sycle工具和体外研究的叙述性评估来评估偏倚风险。共有14项研究(11项体内研究,3项体外研究)符合纳入标准。结果:体外研究显示,单独地塞米松在临床相关剂量下无神经毒性,但与高浓度局麻药联用可增强细胞毒性。体内模型一般未显示出明显的长期神经炎症、退行性变或脱髓鞘,神经周地塞米松组在早期观察到一些保护作用。然而,所有的体内研究都被评为高偏倚风险。在神经损伤模型中,损伤后立即给予地塞米松可降低细胞凋亡和炎症标志物,延迟给予地塞米松作用有限。结论:临床前证据支持低剂量、不含防腐剂的神经周围地塞米松的一般安全性。尽管如此,在神经病患者中大剂量使用、添加物和应用可能会带来风险。鉴于现有研究的高偏倚风险和与全身给药相比的最小附加益处,建议临床谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信