{"title":"Factors Influencing Panel Size of Primary Care Nurse Practitioners.","authors":"Arnaud Duhoux, Annie Rioux-Dubois, Renaud Ross-deBlois, Morgane Gabet","doi":"10.1002/nur.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to investigate organizational and practitioner-related factors influencing the panel size of primary care nurse practitioners (PC-NPs) in Quebec (Canada). Cross-sectional study. This secondary analysis was based on a cross-sectional study that used a self-administered online questionnaire available from March to April 2022 to assess the work conditions of NPs in Quebec. A multiple regression analysis was conducted on a subset of 321 PC-NPs to predict panel size and associated factors. Among 321 PC-NPs, with a mean of 4.6 years of experience as NP, the average panel size was 344 patients. Factors significantly associated with a greater panel size were a higher number of years of experience as a NP (p < 0.001), a higher number of years spent in the current organization (p < 0.001) and a higher number of patients seen in an average day (p < 0.001). Our study provided a measure of the PC-NP panel size in the province of Québec highlighting their essential role in primary health care. The results suggest that policymakers and administrators should focus on enhancing the experience of their PC team, ensuring employment stability and providing adequate time for patient appointments to optimize PC-NP panel size and enhance service capacity to increase access to primary health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.70016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate organizational and practitioner-related factors influencing the panel size of primary care nurse practitioners (PC-NPs) in Quebec (Canada). Cross-sectional study. This secondary analysis was based on a cross-sectional study that used a self-administered online questionnaire available from March to April 2022 to assess the work conditions of NPs in Quebec. A multiple regression analysis was conducted on a subset of 321 PC-NPs to predict panel size and associated factors. Among 321 PC-NPs, with a mean of 4.6 years of experience as NP, the average panel size was 344 patients. Factors significantly associated with a greater panel size were a higher number of years of experience as a NP (p < 0.001), a higher number of years spent in the current organization (p < 0.001) and a higher number of patients seen in an average day (p < 0.001). Our study provided a measure of the PC-NP panel size in the province of Québec highlighting their essential role in primary health care. The results suggest that policymakers and administrators should focus on enhancing the experience of their PC team, ensuring employment stability and providing adequate time for patient appointments to optimize PC-NP panel size and enhance service capacity to increase access to primary health care.
期刊介绍:
Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.