Hesitancy and compulsory vaccination: are non-mandatory vaccines the victims? A study on Italian regions.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Luisa Loiacono, Riccardo Puglisi, Leonzio Rizzo, Riccardo Secomandi
{"title":"Hesitancy and compulsory vaccination: are non-mandatory vaccines the victims? A study on Italian regions.","authors":"Luisa Loiacono, Riccardo Puglisi, Leonzio Rizzo, Riccardo Secomandi","doi":"10.1007/s10198-025-01805-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vaccination campaigns are estimated to prevent up to 3 million deaths worldwide annually, with their success relying on sufficient immunization coverage and adherence to programs. Recent health crises and measures like the EU Digital Covid-19 Certificate have renewed interest in the effectiveness of strategies such as recommendations, mandates, and sanctions. We analyze data on vaccinations for children aged 0-2 from Italian regions during the pre-pandemic period, 2013 to 2019. This includes both recommended and mandatory vaccines, as well as the introduction of a 2017 law mandating certain vaccinations. Our analysis shows the law increased vaccination rates for newly mandatory vaccines by up to 6%. Regional differences emerged, particularly in high-hesitancy areas where citizens tended to prioritize mandatory vaccines over recommended ones. In these regions, while coverage for mandatory vaccines improved significantly, recommended vaccines saw relatively lower attention, highlighting the need for policies that support comprehensive vaccination efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01805-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vaccination campaigns are estimated to prevent up to 3 million deaths worldwide annually, with their success relying on sufficient immunization coverage and adherence to programs. Recent health crises and measures like the EU Digital Covid-19 Certificate have renewed interest in the effectiveness of strategies such as recommendations, mandates, and sanctions. We analyze data on vaccinations for children aged 0-2 from Italian regions during the pre-pandemic period, 2013 to 2019. This includes both recommended and mandatory vaccines, as well as the introduction of a 2017 law mandating certain vaccinations. Our analysis shows the law increased vaccination rates for newly mandatory vaccines by up to 6%. Regional differences emerged, particularly in high-hesitancy areas where citizens tended to prioritize mandatory vaccines over recommended ones. In these regions, while coverage for mandatory vaccines improved significantly, recommended vaccines saw relatively lower attention, highlighting the need for policies that support comprehensive vaccination efforts.

犹豫和强制接种:非强制性疫苗是受害者吗?意大利地区研究。
据估计,疫苗接种运动每年可在全世界预防多达300万人死亡,其成功取决于足够的免疫覆盖率和对规划的遵守。最近的卫生危机和欧盟数字Covid-19证书等措施重新引起了人们对建议、任务和制裁等战略有效性的关注。我们分析了2013年至2019年大流行前意大利各地区0-2岁儿童的疫苗接种数据。这包括推荐疫苗和强制性疫苗,以及2017年出台的一项强制接种某些疫苗的法律。我们的分析表明,该法律将新强制性疫苗的接种率提高了6%。出现了地区差异,特别是在高度犹豫的地区,那里的公民往往优先考虑强制性疫苗而不是推荐疫苗。在这些区域,虽然强制性疫苗的覆盖率显著提高,但推荐疫苗的关注度相对较低,这突出表明需要制定支持全面疫苗接种工作的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信