From Steps to Mobility Levels: Validating a Consumer-Grade Activity Monitor for Automated Recording of Patient Mobility in Hospitals.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-06 DOI:10.1055/a-2576-1505
Jan Stenum, Eric Stewart, Daniel L Young, Ioannis Collector, Karli Funk, Lydia Vincent, Elizabeth Colantuoni, Erik H Hoyer
{"title":"From Steps to Mobility Levels: Validating a Consumer-Grade Activity Monitor for Automated Recording of Patient Mobility in Hospitals.","authors":"Jan Stenum, Eric Stewart, Daniel L Young, Ioannis Collector, Karli Funk, Lydia Vincent, Elizabeth Colantuoni, Erik H Hoyer","doi":"10.1055/a-2576-1505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient mobility during hospitalization is essential for high-quality healthcare as mobility is linked to physical function and quality of life. The Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility (JH-HLM) scale is a validated method to assess mobility in hospitalized patients. Although the JH-HLM is widely utilized, it has limitations including ceiling effects, unobserved mobility events going unrecorded, and the staff time needed to observe and document.We explored the feasibility of using a consumer-grade activity monitor (Fitbit) to predict JH-HLM scores and address these limitations.JH-HLM scores and step counts were recorded simultaneously using behavioral mapping and analyzed over 1-hour periods among inpatients. We predicted JH-HLM scores based on step counts by fitting ordinal logistic regressions, according to three categorizations of JH-HLM scores reflecting increasing mobility-granularity.We collected data for 189 patient-hours in a cohort of 20 participants. Step counts increased with higher JH-HLM mobility scores. When predicting JH-HLM scores from step counts, there was a trade-off between accuracy and mobility granularity: overall accuracy was 75% when categorizing patient-hours as immobility (JH-HLM of 1 to 5) or mobility (JH-HLM of 6 to 8); accuracy was 68% when categorizing immobility, shorter walking behavior (JH-HLM of 6 to 7), and longer walking behavior (JH-HLM of 8); accuracy was 61% when categorizing immobility and three progressively higher volumes of walking (JH-HLM of 6, 7 and 8).Step counts from the activity monitor could be used to predict whether a patient was immobile or mobile but may lack the sensitivity to accurately predict specific mobility levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":"16 4","pages":"753-759"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12328031/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2576-1505","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient mobility during hospitalization is essential for high-quality healthcare as mobility is linked to physical function and quality of life. The Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility (JH-HLM) scale is a validated method to assess mobility in hospitalized patients. Although the JH-HLM is widely utilized, it has limitations including ceiling effects, unobserved mobility events going unrecorded, and the staff time needed to observe and document.We explored the feasibility of using a consumer-grade activity monitor (Fitbit) to predict JH-HLM scores and address these limitations.JH-HLM scores and step counts were recorded simultaneously using behavioral mapping and analyzed over 1-hour periods among inpatients. We predicted JH-HLM scores based on step counts by fitting ordinal logistic regressions, according to three categorizations of JH-HLM scores reflecting increasing mobility-granularity.We collected data for 189 patient-hours in a cohort of 20 participants. Step counts increased with higher JH-HLM mobility scores. When predicting JH-HLM scores from step counts, there was a trade-off between accuracy and mobility granularity: overall accuracy was 75% when categorizing patient-hours as immobility (JH-HLM of 1 to 5) or mobility (JH-HLM of 6 to 8); accuracy was 68% when categorizing immobility, shorter walking behavior (JH-HLM of 6 to 7), and longer walking behavior (JH-HLM of 8); accuracy was 61% when categorizing immobility and three progressively higher volumes of walking (JH-HLM of 6, 7 and 8).Step counts from the activity monitor could be used to predict whether a patient was immobile or mobile but may lack the sensitivity to accurately predict specific mobility levels.

从步骤到活动水平:验证用于医院患者活动自动记录的消费者级活动监视器。
患者在住院期间的活动能力对于高质量的医疗保健至关重要,因为活动能力与身体功能和生活质量有关。约翰霍普金斯大学最高活动水平(JH-HLM)量表是一种评估住院患者活动能力的有效方法。虽然JH-HLM被广泛使用,但它有一些局限性,包括天花板效应、未被观察到的移动事件未被记录,以及工作人员观察和记录所需的时间。我们探索了使用消费级活动监测器(Fitbit)预测JH-HLM分数的可行性,并解决了这些限制。使用行为映射同时记录住院患者的JH-HLM评分和步数,并在1小时内对其进行分析。我们根据反映流动性粒度增加的JH-HLM分数的三种分类,通过拟合有序逻辑回归来预测基于步数的JH-HLM分数。我们在20名参与者的队列中收集了189个病人小时的数据。步数随着JH-HLM移动得分的增加而增加。当通过步数预测JH-HLM评分时,准确性和活动粒度之间存在权衡:当将患者小时分为不活动(JH-HLM为1至5)或活动(JH-HLM为6至8)时,总体准确性为75%;对不动、较短行走行为(JH-HLM为6 ~ 7)和较长行走行为(JH-HLM为8)进行分类的准确率为68%;当分类不动和三个逐渐增加的行走量时,准确率为61% (JH-HLM为6,7和8)。活动监测器的步数可用于预测患者是活动不动还是活动,但可能缺乏准确预测特定活动水平的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信