What Happens When We Miss? Effect of Initial Lumbar Puncture Success on Infant Sepsis Evaluation.

IF 2.1 Q1 Nursing
Amanda Dube, Manaswitha Khare, Michael Levy, Michelle Edmunds, Aarti Patel, Begem Lee, Tiranun Rungvivatjarus, Elizabeth Mannino Avila
{"title":"What Happens When We Miss? Effect of Initial Lumbar Puncture Success on Infant Sepsis Evaluation.","authors":"Amanda Dube, Manaswitha Khare, Michael Levy, Michelle Edmunds, Aarti Patel, Begem Lee, Tiranun Rungvivatjarus, Elizabeth Mannino Avila","doi":"10.1542/hpeds.2024-008289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Lumbar punctures (LPs) are a common part of infant sepsis evaluations. Failures are estimated at 12% to 40%. Given limited literature on this topic, we describe characteristics, management, and outcomes for infants undergoing sepsis workup with successful vs unsuccessful initial LPs, including those who underwent repeat LP attempt.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of infants aged 0 to 60 days with LP performed during sepsis evaluation. Infants admitted to intensive care units, transferred from another hospital's inpatient unit, or with medical complexity were excluded. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 468 infants, 386 had a successful initial LP (82%). Length of stay (LOS) was longer in infants with an unsuccessful initial LP (P = 0.02). Demographics, length of antibiotics, and readmission rate did not differ between groups. Infants with successful initial LPs were less likely to have viral testing (P = 0.019) and had shorter acyclovir courses (P = 0.026). Only 43% of infants with an unsuccessful initial LP underwent repeat LP attempt. Increased inflammatory markers were associated with repeat LP attempt.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Infants with unsuccessful initial LPs had increased LOS and resource use. Elevated inflammatory markers were associated with repeat LP attempt, and infants with repeat LPs had higher medical utilization. Prospective or multicenter studies are needed to further investigate outcomes and decision-making for infants with unsuccessful LPs and inform guidelines regarding repeat LPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":38180,"journal":{"name":"Hospital pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"758-768"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2024-008289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Lumbar punctures (LPs) are a common part of infant sepsis evaluations. Failures are estimated at 12% to 40%. Given limited literature on this topic, we describe characteristics, management, and outcomes for infants undergoing sepsis workup with successful vs unsuccessful initial LPs, including those who underwent repeat LP attempt.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of infants aged 0 to 60 days with LP performed during sepsis evaluation. Infants admitted to intensive care units, transferred from another hospital's inpatient unit, or with medical complexity were excluded. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed.

Results: Of 468 infants, 386 had a successful initial LP (82%). Length of stay (LOS) was longer in infants with an unsuccessful initial LP (P = 0.02). Demographics, length of antibiotics, and readmission rate did not differ between groups. Infants with successful initial LPs were less likely to have viral testing (P = 0.019) and had shorter acyclovir courses (P = 0.026). Only 43% of infants with an unsuccessful initial LP underwent repeat LP attempt. Increased inflammatory markers were associated with repeat LP attempt.

Conclusions: Infants with unsuccessful initial LPs had increased LOS and resource use. Elevated inflammatory markers were associated with repeat LP attempt, and infants with repeat LPs had higher medical utilization. Prospective or multicenter studies are needed to further investigate outcomes and decision-making for infants with unsuccessful LPs and inform guidelines regarding repeat LPs.

当我们错过时会发生什么?首次腰椎穿刺成功对婴儿脓毒症评估的影响。
背景和目的:腰椎穿刺(LPs)是婴儿败血症评估的常见部分。失败率估计在12%到40%之间。鉴于这一主题的文献有限,我们描述了接受败血症检查的婴儿的特征、管理和结果,包括那些接受了重复LP尝试的婴儿。方法:我们对在脓毒症评估期间接受LP的0至60天婴儿进行了回顾性横断面研究。排除了重症监护室入住的婴儿、从其他医院住院病房转来的婴儿或医疗复杂的婴儿。进行描述性统计和逻辑回归。结果:在468名婴儿中,386名(82%)成功进行了初始LP。初始LP不成功的婴儿的住院时间(LOS)更长(P = 0.02)。人口统计学、抗生素使用时间和再入院率在两组之间没有差异。初始LPs治疗成功的婴儿进行病毒检测的可能性较低(P = 0.019),阿昔洛韦疗程较短(P = 0.026)。首次LP失败的婴儿中只有43%进行了重复LP尝试。炎症标志物的增加与重复LP相关。结论:初始LPs不成功的婴儿LOS和资源使用增加。炎症标志物升高与重复LP相关,重复LP的婴儿有更高的医疗利用率。需要前瞻性或多中心研究来进一步调查不成功的lp婴儿的结局和决策,并为重复lp提供指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital pediatrics
Hospital pediatrics Nursing-Pediatrics
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信