Temporal Trends in the Prescription of Biosimilars and the Status of Switching from Original Biologics to Biosimilars at Individual and Institutional Levels in Japan.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Minako Matsumoto, Ryosuke Kumazawa, Akiko Ishii-Watabe, Itsuko Horiguchi, Hiroaki Mamiya, Hiroko Shibata, Yoshiro Saito, Motohiko Adomi, Yuta Taniguchi, Jun Komiyama, Ryoko Sakai, Masao Iwagami
{"title":"Temporal Trends in the Prescription of Biosimilars and the Status of Switching from Original Biologics to Biosimilars at Individual and Institutional Levels in Japan.","authors":"Minako Matsumoto, Ryosuke Kumazawa, Akiko Ishii-Watabe, Itsuko Horiguchi, Hiroaki Mamiya, Hiroko Shibata, Yoshiro Saito, Motohiko Adomi, Yuta Taniguchi, Jun Komiyama, Ryoko Sakai, Masao Iwagami","doi":"10.1007/s43441-025-00850-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the temporal trends in the prescription of biologics in Japan, with additional analysis focusing on switching from original biologics to biosimilars at the individual and institutional levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the JMDC claims database from January 2005 to May 2024, we identified patients who received at least one prescription for 17 biologics (original biologics or biosimilars). We elucidated the monthly trends in the proportions of original biologics and biosimilars. We also estimated the proportion of patients receiving original biologics only, those receiving biosimilars only, and those switching from original biologics to biosimilars (and vice versa) during the study period. Finally, we estimated the proportion of medical institutions that started prescribing biosimilars during the study period based on the type of medical institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Temporal trends in the proportions of original biologics and biosimilars varied widely. In May 2024, the proportion of biosimilar prescriptions was 13.6% for somatropin and 92.5% for filgrastim. At the individual level, the proportion of patients switching from original biologics to biosimilars was low (1.2-14.0%), indicating that switches do not often occur within the same patient, while more recent new users of biologics start biosimilars. At the institutional level, university-related hospitals and clinics were more and less likely, respectively to introduce biosimilars than public and other types of hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Temporal trends in the prescription of biosimilars and switching patterns varied widely by the type of biologics. The type of medical institution should be considered when assessing and promoting the use of biosimilars. Further research and strategies to increase the use of biosimilars in clinics may be needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00850-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the temporal trends in the prescription of biologics in Japan, with additional analysis focusing on switching from original biologics to biosimilars at the individual and institutional levels.

Methods: Using the JMDC claims database from January 2005 to May 2024, we identified patients who received at least one prescription for 17 biologics (original biologics or biosimilars). We elucidated the monthly trends in the proportions of original biologics and biosimilars. We also estimated the proportion of patients receiving original biologics only, those receiving biosimilars only, and those switching from original biologics to biosimilars (and vice versa) during the study period. Finally, we estimated the proportion of medical institutions that started prescribing biosimilars during the study period based on the type of medical institution.

Results: Temporal trends in the proportions of original biologics and biosimilars varied widely. In May 2024, the proportion of biosimilar prescriptions was 13.6% for somatropin and 92.5% for filgrastim. At the individual level, the proportion of patients switching from original biologics to biosimilars was low (1.2-14.0%), indicating that switches do not often occur within the same patient, while more recent new users of biologics start biosimilars. At the institutional level, university-related hospitals and clinics were more and less likely, respectively to introduce biosimilars than public and other types of hospitals.

Conclusion: Temporal trends in the prescription of biosimilars and switching patterns varied widely by the type of biologics. The type of medical institution should be considered when assessing and promoting the use of biosimilars. Further research and strategies to increase the use of biosimilars in clinics may be needed.

日本生物仿制药处方的时间趋势及个人和机构层面从原研生物药转向生物仿制药的现状
目的:描述日本生物制剂处方的时间趋势,并在个人和机构层面上重点分析从原始生物制剂转向生物仿制药的情况。方法:使用2005年1月至2024年5月的JMDC索赔数据库,我们确定了接受17种生物制剂(原生物制剂或生物仿制药)至少一种处方的患者。我们阐明了原研生物制剂和生物类似药比例的月度趋势。我们还估计了在研究期间仅接受原研生物制剂、仅接受生物仿制药以及从原研生物制剂转向生物仿制药(反之亦然)的患者比例。最后,我们根据医疗机构类型估算了研究期间开始开生物仿制药的医疗机构比例。结果:原始生物制剂和生物仿制药比例的时间趋势差异很大。2024年5月,生长激素和非格拉西汀的生物仿制药处方占比分别为13.6%和92.5%。在个体水平上,从原生物制剂转向生物仿制药的患者比例较低(1.2-14.0%),这表明切换并不经常发生在同一患者中,而最近使用生物制剂的新用户开始使用生物仿制药。在机构层面,大学附属医院和诊所引入生物仿制药的可能性分别高于公立医院和其他类型医院。结论:生物仿制药处方的时间趋势和转换模式因生物制剂类型而异。在评估和促进生物仿制药的使用时,应考虑医疗机构的类型。可能需要进一步的研究和策略来增加临床中生物仿制药的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信