Characteristics and mortality of patients leaving the emergency department without being seen by a physician: a cohort study.

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Emil Mellgren, Susann J Järhult, Lars Lind, Åsa Muntlin
{"title":"Characteristics and mortality of patients leaving the emergency department without being seen by a physician: a cohort study.","authors":"Emil Mellgren, Susann J Järhult, Lars Lind, Åsa Muntlin","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and importance: </strong>Crowded emergency departments (EDs) and long waiting times may lead to delayed care for acute conditions and increased mortality in patients leaving without being seen by a physician (LWBS).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to characterize patients LWBS from the ED at a Swedish university hospital and report their mortality.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A cohort study was conducted. Data from electronic medical records of patients LWBS (exposure) were compared with those who stayed through completion of treatment. Data were gathered from 151 228 patients making 363 308 visits to the Uppsala University Hospital ED from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2017.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and analysis: </strong>Short- and long-term mortality of patients LWBS were studied using Cox regression analysis. Sex, age, triage level, arrival mode, length of stay, presenting complaint, crowding, and time of day were assessed as regards effect on the probability of LWBS and as covariates in the mortality analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our dataset, 9058 patient visits to the ED (2.5% of all ED visits) ended in LWBS. These patients were younger than average and had lower triage levels. No significant difference was found between males and females. The highest rates were seen in patients presenting with a psychiatric disorder (12.8%), victims of physical assault (11.7%), or alcohol/drug withdrawal (9.9%). The likelihood of LWBS was highest in the evening and lowest in the early morning. Short-term mortality at 28 days was not significantly affected by LWBS, but a 34% lower long-term mortality risk was seen for patients LWBS (hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.95, P = 0.028) in median follow-up of 3.5 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients LWBS were younger, had lower triage levels, and more frequently presented with psychiatric or substance use-related complaints. They had lower short- and long-term mortality compared with those who completed treatment. This observation does not imply a causal relationship but highlights differences in patient characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001268","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and importance: Crowded emergency departments (EDs) and long waiting times may lead to delayed care for acute conditions and increased mortality in patients leaving without being seen by a physician (LWBS).

Objectives: The aim of this study was to characterize patients LWBS from the ED at a Swedish university hospital and report their mortality.

Design, setting, and participants: A cohort study was conducted. Data from electronic medical records of patients LWBS (exposure) were compared with those who stayed through completion of treatment. Data were gathered from 151 228 patients making 363 308 visits to the Uppsala University Hospital ED from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2017.

Outcome measures and analysis: Short- and long-term mortality of patients LWBS were studied using Cox regression analysis. Sex, age, triage level, arrival mode, length of stay, presenting complaint, crowding, and time of day were assessed as regards effect on the probability of LWBS and as covariates in the mortality analysis.

Results: In our dataset, 9058 patient visits to the ED (2.5% of all ED visits) ended in LWBS. These patients were younger than average and had lower triage levels. No significant difference was found between males and females. The highest rates were seen in patients presenting with a psychiatric disorder (12.8%), victims of physical assault (11.7%), or alcohol/drug withdrawal (9.9%). The likelihood of LWBS was highest in the evening and lowest in the early morning. Short-term mortality at 28 days was not significantly affected by LWBS, but a 34% lower long-term mortality risk was seen for patients LWBS (hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.95, P = 0.028) in median follow-up of 3.5 years.

Conclusion: Patients LWBS were younger, had lower triage levels, and more frequently presented with psychiatric or substance use-related complaints. They had lower short- and long-term mortality compared with those who completed treatment. This observation does not imply a causal relationship but highlights differences in patient characteristics.

未见内科医生而离开急诊科患者的特征和死亡率:一项队列研究。
背景和重要性:拥挤的急诊科(EDs)和漫长的等待时间可能导致急症的护理延迟,并增加患者在没有医生看到的情况下离开的死亡率(LWBS)。目的:本研究的目的是描述瑞典大学医院急诊科的LWBS患者的特征并报告他们的死亡率。设计、环境和参与者:进行了一项队列研究。将LWBS(暴露)患者的电子病历数据与完成治疗的患者进行比较。数据来自2010年1月1日至2017年6月30日至乌普萨拉大学医院急诊科就诊的151 228名患者,就诊次数为363 308次。结果测量和分析:采用Cox回归分析研究LWBS患者的短期和长期死亡率。评估性别、年龄、分诊级别、到达方式、住院时间、主诉、拥挤程度和一天中的时间对LWBS概率的影响以及作为死亡率分析中的协变量。结果:在我们的数据集中,9058名急诊科患者(占所有急诊科患者的2.5%)以LWBS结束。这些患者比平均年龄小,分诊水平也较低。在男性和女性之间没有发现显著差异。发病率最高的是精神疾病患者(12.8%)、身体攻击受害者(11.7%)或酒精/药物戒断(9.9%)。LWBS发生的可能性在傍晚最高,在清晨最低。在中位3.5年的随访中,LWBS对28天的短期死亡率没有显著影响,但LWBS患者的长期死亡率降低34%(风险比0.66,95%可信区间0.45-0.95,P = 0.028)。结论:LWBS患者更年轻,分诊水平较低,更频繁地出现精神或物质使用相关的投诉。与完成治疗的患者相比,他们的短期和长期死亡率都较低。这一观察结果并不意味着因果关系,但突出了患者特征的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
27.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Emergency Medicine is the official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. It is devoted to serving the European emergency medicine community and to promoting European standards of training, diagnosis and care in this rapidly growing field. Published bimonthly, the Journal offers original papers on all aspects of acute injury and sudden illness, including: emergency medicine, anaesthesiology, cardiology, disaster medicine, intensive care, internal medicine, orthopaedics, paediatrics, toxicology and trauma care. It addresses issues on the organization of emergency services in hospitals and in the community and examines postgraduate training from European and global perspectives. The Journal also publishes papers focusing on the different models of emergency healthcare delivery in Europe and beyond. With a multidisciplinary approach, the European Journal of Emergency Medicine publishes scientific research, topical reviews, news of meetings and events of interest to the emergency medicine community. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信