Drug discovery and preclinical testing of drug candidates for developmental and epileptic encephalopathies.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-08-06 DOI:10.1111/epi.18581
Heidrun Potschka, Daniel Pérez-Pérez
{"title":"Drug discovery and preclinical testing of drug candidates for developmental and epileptic encephalopathies.","authors":"Heidrun Potschka, Daniel Pérez-Pérez","doi":"10.1111/epi.18581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drug development for developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) follows different strategies on one hand including disease-targeting precision medicine approaches considering the genetic variants and pathomechanisms in DEEs and on the other hand including therapeutic approaches with novel targets or second-generation drug candidates that may be of interest beyond selected DEEs. Although the first group of approaches can only be tested in dedicated DEE models, assessment in induced non-specific seizure and epilepsy models may provide valuable information if the mechanism of action implies a broader spectrum of efficacy. Data from such models can inform about general anti-seizure efficacy, efficacy against different seizure types including a possible broad-spectrum potential, dose range, and \"therapeutic\" plasma/brain concentrations. However, only dedicated DEE models will guide selection of the best candidates with a favorable efficacy and tolerability spectrum for specific DEEs. Several DEE models have already been used for preclinical testing of therapeutic approaches. Testing in these specific models can provide information about the effects on seizure generation; spread of seizure activity; epilepsy development; survival; behavioral, cognitive, and motor function; and about tolerability. On the other hand, we still face several limitations and challenges including lack of models for many DEEs, incomplete penetrance of the phenotype, high mortality, low throughput, limited knowledge concerning pharmacology and predictive validity, and species differences in development and disease course. In this review, we provide an overview of the preclinical efficacy data of approved orphan drugs in both model types and discuss the current state-of-knowledge concerning predictive validity. In conclusion, testing strategies need to be carefully tailored to the candidate drug or therapeutic approach. In this context, there is an urgent need for development of further specific DEE models and for a comprehensive characterization of the face and predictive validity of existing and future DEE models.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18581","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drug development for developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) follows different strategies on one hand including disease-targeting precision medicine approaches considering the genetic variants and pathomechanisms in DEEs and on the other hand including therapeutic approaches with novel targets or second-generation drug candidates that may be of interest beyond selected DEEs. Although the first group of approaches can only be tested in dedicated DEE models, assessment in induced non-specific seizure and epilepsy models may provide valuable information if the mechanism of action implies a broader spectrum of efficacy. Data from such models can inform about general anti-seizure efficacy, efficacy against different seizure types including a possible broad-spectrum potential, dose range, and "therapeutic" plasma/brain concentrations. However, only dedicated DEE models will guide selection of the best candidates with a favorable efficacy and tolerability spectrum for specific DEEs. Several DEE models have already been used for preclinical testing of therapeutic approaches. Testing in these specific models can provide information about the effects on seizure generation; spread of seizure activity; epilepsy development; survival; behavioral, cognitive, and motor function; and about tolerability. On the other hand, we still face several limitations and challenges including lack of models for many DEEs, incomplete penetrance of the phenotype, high mortality, low throughput, limited knowledge concerning pharmacology and predictive validity, and species differences in development and disease course. In this review, we provide an overview of the preclinical efficacy data of approved orphan drugs in both model types and discuss the current state-of-knowledge concerning predictive validity. In conclusion, testing strategies need to be carefully tailored to the candidate drug or therapeutic approach. In this context, there is an urgent need for development of further specific DEE models and for a comprehensive characterization of the face and predictive validity of existing and future DEE models.

发展性和癫痫性脑病的药物发现和候选药物的临床前试验。
发展性脑病和癫痫性脑病(dee)的药物开发遵循不同的策略,一方面包括考虑dei的遗传变异和病理机制的疾病靶向精准医学方法,另一方面包括新靶点或第二代候选药物的治疗方法,这些方法可能超出所选的dei。虽然第一组方法只能在专门的DEE模型中进行测试,但如果作用机制意味着更广泛的功效,则在诱导非特异性发作和癫痫模型中进行评估可能提供有价值的信息。来自这些模型的数据可以告知一般的抗癫痫疗效,对不同类型癫痫的疗效,包括可能的广谱电位,剂量范围和“治疗性”血浆/脑浓度。然而,只有专门的DEE模型才能指导选择对特定DEE具有良好疗效和耐受性谱的最佳候选药物。一些DEE模型已经用于治疗方法的临床前测试。在这些特定模型中的测试可以提供有关癫痫发作产生的影响的信息;癫痫发作活动的扩散;癫痫发展;生存而生存;行为、认知和运动功能;还有关于容忍度。另一方面,我们仍然面临一些限制和挑战,包括缺乏许多dei的模型,表型不完全外显,高死亡率,低通量,关于药理学和预测有效性的知识有限,以及物种在发育和疾病过程中的差异。在这篇综述中,我们概述了两种模型类型中已批准的孤儿药的临床前疗效数据,并讨论了目前关于预测效度的知识状况。总之,测试策略需要根据候选药物或治疗方法精心定制。在此背景下,迫切需要开发更具体的DEE模型,并对现有和未来DEE模型的面貌和预测有效性进行全面表征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信