Investigating changes in quality-of-life after high-dose high-intensity upper limb rehabilitation in chronic stroke survivors: A mixed-methods analysis of the Queen Square Programme.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-06 DOI:10.1177/02692155251363439
Amanda Strawson, Jill J Francis, Fran Brander, Kate Kelly, Mark Haddad, Nick S Ward
{"title":"Investigating changes in quality-of-life after high-dose high-intensity upper limb rehabilitation in chronic stroke survivors: A mixed-methods analysis of the Queen Square Programme.","authors":"Amanda Strawson, Jill J Francis, Fran Brander, Kate Kelly, Mark Haddad, Nick S Ward","doi":"10.1177/02692155251363439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate changes in quality-of-life and explore psychosocial influences on social participation and recovery in chronic stroke survivors following intensive upper limb neurorehabilitation.DesignMixed-methods design with quantitative (pre-post design with follow-up) and qualitative (semi-structured interview) phases.SettingThree-week Queen Square upper limb neurorehabilitation programme.Participants65 stroke survivors who participated in the programme from July 2016 to March 2018.Main measuresStroke Impact Scale (3.0) (SIS) and Action Research Arm Test, collected on admission, discharge, 6-week and 6-month follow-up (n = 65). Beliefs and psychosocial factors influencing quality-of-life were investigated through thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews in two subgroups, based whether the SIS-participation domain change from admission to follow-up was high (> 20, n = 5) or low (<-24, n = 5).ResultsSeven out of eight SIS domains, overall self-rated recovery (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and Action Research Arm Test (<i>p</i> < 0.001) improved from admission to discharge. The emotion domain improved from admission to discharge (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and reduced from discharge to 6-month follow-up (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Interviews highlighted four key psychosocial themes with contrasting positive and negative perspectives between higher change and lower change groups; themes 'hidden negative effects' and 'loneliness' were evident in the lower change group and 'getting on with my life' in the higher change group.ConclusionThe Queen Square upper limb neurorehabilitation programme led to measurable therapeutic benefits on physical and non-physical quality-of-life outcomes. However, the lack of sustained improvement in self-reported emotion contrasts with the clear benefits in other domains. This indicates a need for ongoing psychosocial support for some stroke survivors, supported by the qualitative findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1324-1339"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251363439","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate changes in quality-of-life and explore psychosocial influences on social participation and recovery in chronic stroke survivors following intensive upper limb neurorehabilitation.DesignMixed-methods design with quantitative (pre-post design with follow-up) and qualitative (semi-structured interview) phases.SettingThree-week Queen Square upper limb neurorehabilitation programme.Participants65 stroke survivors who participated in the programme from July 2016 to March 2018.Main measuresStroke Impact Scale (3.0) (SIS) and Action Research Arm Test, collected on admission, discharge, 6-week and 6-month follow-up (n = 65). Beliefs and psychosocial factors influencing quality-of-life were investigated through thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews in two subgroups, based whether the SIS-participation domain change from admission to follow-up was high (> 20, n = 5) or low (<-24, n = 5).ResultsSeven out of eight SIS domains, overall self-rated recovery (p < 0.001) and Action Research Arm Test (p < 0.001) improved from admission to discharge. The emotion domain improved from admission to discharge (p < 0.001) and reduced from discharge to 6-month follow-up (p < 0.001). Interviews highlighted four key psychosocial themes with contrasting positive and negative perspectives between higher change and lower change groups; themes 'hidden negative effects' and 'loneliness' were evident in the lower change group and 'getting on with my life' in the higher change group.ConclusionThe Queen Square upper limb neurorehabilitation programme led to measurable therapeutic benefits on physical and non-physical quality-of-life outcomes. However, the lack of sustained improvement in self-reported emotion contrasts with the clear benefits in other domains. This indicates a need for ongoing psychosocial support for some stroke survivors, supported by the qualitative findings.

调查慢性中风幸存者在高剂量高强度上肢康复后生活质量的变化:皇后广场项目的混合方法分析。
目的评价慢性脑卒中患者上肢神经强化康复后生活质量的变化,探讨社会心理对患者社会参与和康复的影响。设计混合方法设计,包括定量(前后设计和后续)和定性(半结构化访谈)阶段。三周皇后广场上肢神经康复计划。参与者:2016年7月至2018年3月期间参加该项目的65名中风幸存者。主要测量方法:脑卒中影响量表(SIS)(3.0)和行动研究臂测试,于入院、出院、随访6周和6个月时采集(n = 65)。基于从入院到随访的sis参与域变化是高(bbb20, n = 5)还是低(p p p p),通过半结构化访谈的主题分析,对影响生活质量的信念和心理社会因素进行了调查
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信