The SCVP and AECVP 'Seaport criteria' for lymphocytic myocarditis: Retrospective application to an autopsy cohort.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiovascular Pathology Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.carpath.2025.107763
Sarah Parsons, Hans H de Boer
{"title":"The SCVP and AECVP 'Seaport criteria' for lymphocytic myocarditis: Retrospective application to an autopsy cohort.","authors":"Sarah Parsons, Hans H de Boer","doi":"10.1016/j.carpath.2025.107763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosing lymphocytic myocarditis in non-biopsy specimens remains challenging due to sampling variability, subjective interpretation of histology, and lack of standardized criteria. In 2025, the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology (SCVP) and the Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology (AECVP) proposed the \"Seaport criteria\" to address these limitations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the practical applicability of the Seaport criteria in a retrospective cohort of forensic autopsy cases with myocardial lymphocytic-predominant inflammation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-three autopsy cases with lymphocytic-predominant myocardial inflammation were re-evaluated according to the Seaport criteria. Death in these cases was attributed to myocarditis (n = 45), unascertained causes (n = 34), or drug toxicity (n = 14). We assessed adherence to the recommended technical requirements, reclassified inflammation as diffuse, multifocal, focal myocarditis, or lymphocytic infiltrates of unknown significance (LIUS), and reviewed the original histological descriptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most cases (82 %) met the minimum technical sampling standards. Pediatric cases were disproportionately non-compliant with sampling requirements, but not due to insufficient myocardium being sampled. Original histological reporting varied substantially in terminology and detail, with myocyte injury inconsistently reported and a lack of sufficient information for grading under the Seaport criteria. Re-classification resulted in 36 cases of diffuse, 27 multifocal, 2 focal myocarditis, and 28 LIUS. The most common diagnosis in cases given myocarditis as the cause of death was diffuse myocarditis (33/45), whereas LIUS was most frequent in the drug-related and unascertained cohorts. Myocyte injury was sometimes difficult to interpret.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Seaport criteria are feasible to classify lymphocytic myocarditis in autopsy hearts, with potential to standardize histological assessment and therefore improve diagnostic consistency. However, challenges remain in recognizing myocyte injury. Further prospective multicenter validation is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":9451,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"107763"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpath.2025.107763","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diagnosing lymphocytic myocarditis in non-biopsy specimens remains challenging due to sampling variability, subjective interpretation of histology, and lack of standardized criteria. In 2025, the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology (SCVP) and the Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology (AECVP) proposed the "Seaport criteria" to address these limitations.

Objective: To assess the practical applicability of the Seaport criteria in a retrospective cohort of forensic autopsy cases with myocardial lymphocytic-predominant inflammation.

Methods: Ninety-three autopsy cases with lymphocytic-predominant myocardial inflammation were re-evaluated according to the Seaport criteria. Death in these cases was attributed to myocarditis (n = 45), unascertained causes (n = 34), or drug toxicity (n = 14). We assessed adherence to the recommended technical requirements, reclassified inflammation as diffuse, multifocal, focal myocarditis, or lymphocytic infiltrates of unknown significance (LIUS), and reviewed the original histological descriptions.

Results: Most cases (82 %) met the minimum technical sampling standards. Pediatric cases were disproportionately non-compliant with sampling requirements, but not due to insufficient myocardium being sampled. Original histological reporting varied substantially in terminology and detail, with myocyte injury inconsistently reported and a lack of sufficient information for grading under the Seaport criteria. Re-classification resulted in 36 cases of diffuse, 27 multifocal, 2 focal myocarditis, and 28 LIUS. The most common diagnosis in cases given myocarditis as the cause of death was diffuse myocarditis (33/45), whereas LIUS was most frequent in the drug-related and unascertained cohorts. Myocyte injury was sometimes difficult to interpret.

Conclusions: The Seaport criteria are feasible to classify lymphocytic myocarditis in autopsy hearts, with potential to standardize histological assessment and therefore improve diagnostic consistency. However, challenges remain in recognizing myocyte injury. Further prospective multicenter validation is recommended.

淋巴细胞性心肌炎的SCVP和AECVP“海港标准”:回顾性应用于尸检队列。
背景:在非活检标本中诊断淋巴细胞性心肌炎仍然具有挑战性,因为样本可变性、组织学的主观解释和缺乏标准化标准。2025年,心血管病理学会(SCVP)和欧洲心血管病理协会(AECVP)提出了“海港标准”来解决这些限制。目的:评价Seaport标准在心肌淋巴细胞显性炎症的法医尸检病例回顾性队列中的实际适用性。方法:根据Seaport标准,对93例以淋巴细胞为主的心肌炎症进行重新评价。这些病例中的死亡归因于心肌炎(n=45)、原因不明(n=34)或药物毒性(n=14)。我们评估了对推荐技术要求的依从性,将炎症重新分类为弥漫性、多灶性、局灶性心肌炎或不明意义淋巴细胞浸润(LIUS),并回顾了原始组织学描述。结果:多数病例(82%)符合最低技术抽样标准。儿科病例不成比例地不符合采样要求,但不是由于心肌采样不足。原始组织学报告在术语和细节上有很大差异,心肌细胞损伤的报告不一致,并且缺乏根据海港标准进行分级的足够信息。弥漫性心肌炎36例,多灶性心肌炎27例,局灶性心肌炎2例,LIUS 28例。在以心肌炎作为死亡原因的病例中,最常见的诊断是弥漫性心肌炎(33/45),而LIUS在药物相关和未确定的队列中最常见。肌细胞损伤有时难以解释。结论:Seaport标准对尸检心脏淋巴细胞性心肌炎分类是可行的,有可能规范组织学评估,从而提高诊断的一致性。然而,在识别肌细胞损伤方面仍然存在挑战。建议进一步进行前瞻性多中心验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Pathology
Cardiovascular Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Pathology is a bimonthly journal that presents articles on topics covering the entire spectrum of cardiovascular disease. The Journal''s primary objective is to publish papers on disease-oriented morphology and pathogenesis from clinicians and scientists in the cardiovascular field. Subjects covered include cardiovascular biology, prosthetic devices, molecular biology and experimental models of cardiovascular disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信