Oncologic outpatient specialty palliative care referral uptake: a single institution quality improvement project.

4区 医学 Q2 Nursing
Luca Petrey, Rubina Ratnaparkhi, Elaine Pope, Sharon Fitzgerald Wolff, Ian Cook, Melissa Javellana, Andrea Jewell, Christian Sinclair, Lori Spoozak
{"title":"Oncologic outpatient specialty palliative care referral uptake: a single institution quality improvement project.","authors":"Luca Petrey, Rubina Ratnaparkhi, Elaine Pope, Sharon Fitzgerald Wolff, Ian Cook, Melissa Javellana, Andrea Jewell, Christian Sinclair, Lori Spoozak","doi":"10.21037/apm-25-39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Late-stage and recurrent disease patients with a prognosis of 6-24 months should receive specialty palliative care, yet only 30% of eligible patients are referred. We aimed to characterize outpatient palliative care referral sources, timeliness, and completion rates across our cancer center at The University of Kansas Medical Center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single institution retrospective quality improvement study of patients in oncology subspecialties with the most palliative care referrals from 2019-2022 at our institution. Data collected included demographics, referral sources, and utilization metrics. The primary outcome was referral completion rates, and secondary outcomes included time from referral to first palliative care visit, hospice enrollment, and/or death. We performed descriptive statistics using chi-square and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests to compare oncologic subspecialty cohorts regarding these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1,674 outpatient specialty palliative care referrals. Medical oncologists initiated 57%, whereas surgical oncologists initiated only 14%. Seventy-four percent of patients referred were ultimately seen by outpatient palliative care. Gynecologic and breast cancer patients had the highest rates of being scheduled. The median time from referral to appointment was 20 days, ranging from 19-23 days. The most common reason patients did not utilize palliative care was patient choice (41%). Eighty-five percent of patients were enrolled in hospice at the time of death; gynecologic cancer patients had the highest rate of enrollment. The median time from referral to hospice was 66 days and the median time from palliative care referral to death was 92 days. Gynecologic cancer patients had the longest median times for both metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At our cancer center, most patients referred to outpatient specialty palliative care were seen within 30 days, which represents timely initiation of palliative care after referral placement. However, the uptake of outpatient specialty palliative care and the timing of outpatient specialty palliative care referral relative to end-of-life transitions varied across oncologic subspecialties. Relevant goals for quality improvement interventions include increasing palliative care referrals among surgical oncologists, referring patients earlier in the disease process, and reframing palliative care as a beneficial resource for all patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":"14 4","pages":"332-344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-25-39","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Late-stage and recurrent disease patients with a prognosis of 6-24 months should receive specialty palliative care, yet only 30% of eligible patients are referred. We aimed to characterize outpatient palliative care referral sources, timeliness, and completion rates across our cancer center at The University of Kansas Medical Center.

Methods: We conducted a single institution retrospective quality improvement study of patients in oncology subspecialties with the most palliative care referrals from 2019-2022 at our institution. Data collected included demographics, referral sources, and utilization metrics. The primary outcome was referral completion rates, and secondary outcomes included time from referral to first palliative care visit, hospice enrollment, and/or death. We performed descriptive statistics using chi-square and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests to compare oncologic subspecialty cohorts regarding these outcomes.

Results: There were 1,674 outpatient specialty palliative care referrals. Medical oncologists initiated 57%, whereas surgical oncologists initiated only 14%. Seventy-four percent of patients referred were ultimately seen by outpatient palliative care. Gynecologic and breast cancer patients had the highest rates of being scheduled. The median time from referral to appointment was 20 days, ranging from 19-23 days. The most common reason patients did not utilize palliative care was patient choice (41%). Eighty-five percent of patients were enrolled in hospice at the time of death; gynecologic cancer patients had the highest rate of enrollment. The median time from referral to hospice was 66 days and the median time from palliative care referral to death was 92 days. Gynecologic cancer patients had the longest median times for both metrics.

Conclusions: At our cancer center, most patients referred to outpatient specialty palliative care were seen within 30 days, which represents timely initiation of palliative care after referral placement. However, the uptake of outpatient specialty palliative care and the timing of outpatient specialty palliative care referral relative to end-of-life transitions varied across oncologic subspecialties. Relevant goals for quality improvement interventions include increasing palliative care referrals among surgical oncologists, referring patients earlier in the disease process, and reframing palliative care as a beneficial resource for all patients.

肿瘤门诊专科姑息治疗转诊吸收:单一机构质量改善项目。
背景:预后为6-24个月的晚期和复发性疾病患者应接受专科姑息治疗,但只有30%的符合条件的患者转诊。我们的目的是表征门诊姑息治疗转诊来源、及时性和完成率在我们的癌症中心在堪萨斯大学医学中心。方法:我们对我院2019-2022年姑息治疗转诊最多的肿瘤亚专科患者进行了一项单机构回顾性质量改进研究。收集的数据包括人口统计、推荐来源和利用率指标。主要结局是转诊完成率,次要结局包括从转诊到第一次姑息治疗就诊的时间、临终关怀登记和/或死亡。我们使用卡方和单因素方差分析(ANOVA)检验进行描述性统计,比较肿瘤亚专科队列的这些结果。结果:门诊专科姑息治疗转诊1674例。内科肿瘤学家发起了57%,而外科肿瘤学家只有14%。74%的转诊患者最终接受了门诊姑息治疗。妇科和乳腺癌患者的排期率最高。从转诊到预约的中位时间为20天,范围为19-23天。患者不使用姑息治疗的最常见原因是患者的选择(41%)。85%的病人在死亡时登记在临终关怀中心;妇科癌症患者的入组率最高。从转介到安宁疗护的中位时间为66天,从缓和疗护转介到死亡的中位时间为92天。妇科癌症患者两项指标的中位时间最长。结论:在我们的癌症中心,大多数转介到门诊专科姑息治疗的患者在30天内就诊,这代表了转诊安置后及时开始姑息治疗。然而,门诊专科姑息治疗的吸收和门诊专科姑息治疗转诊的时间相对于生命末期的转变在肿瘤亚专科各不相同。质量改善干预措施的相关目标包括增加外科肿瘤学家之间的姑息治疗转诊,在疾病过程中早期转诊患者,并将姑息治疗重新定义为所有患者的有益资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of palliative medicine
Annals of palliative medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
231
期刊介绍: Annals of Palliative Medicine (Ann Palliat Med; Print ISSN 2224-5820; Online ISSN 2224-5839) is an open access, international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly with both online and printed copies since 2012. The aim of the journal is to provide up-to-date and cutting-edge information and professional support for health care providers in palliative medicine disciplines to improve the quality of life for patients and their families and caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信