A Novel Numerical Model for Coupled Large-Strain Consolidation and Solute Transport in Clayey Soils Considering Chemico-Osmotic and Creep Deformation

IF 3.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Peng-Lin Li, Ding-Bao Song, Zhen-Yu Yin, Jian-Hua Yin
{"title":"A Novel Numerical Model for Coupled Large-Strain Consolidation and Solute Transport in Clayey Soils Considering Chemico-Osmotic and Creep Deformation","authors":"Peng-Lin Li,&nbsp;Ding-Bao Song,&nbsp;Zhen-Yu Yin,&nbsp;Jian-Hua Yin","doi":"10.1002/nag.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Contaminated geomaterials in CDFs (confined disposal facilities) and CCLs (compacted clay layers) typically undergo a long-term process involving coupled finite strain consolidation and solute transport, posing challenges for fully coupled modeling. To fill this research gap, a novel finite strain consolidation-solute transport model incorporating chemico-osmotic and creep effects is developed. The predictive accuracy of the model is verified through comparisons with existing analytical and numerical solute transport models with consolidation effect, a finite-strain consolidation model, and a small-strain HMC (hydro-mechanical-chemo) model. The model effectively replicates oedometer tests with one-step and three-step salinization, revealing significant volume changes (15.6% and 5.74% for two tests) due to chemical loading, even larger than those (5.31% and 5.13%) due to mechanical loading. Finally, parametric studies highlight the influence of creep, compressibility, boundary conditions, initial concentration distribution, and adsorption, demonstrating that chemico-osmotic effects can generate large negative pore pressures (50% of initial pore pressure) and average consolidation degree (about 140%). Compared with consolidation-related parameters, the adsorption coefficient has a more noticeable effect on solute transport, leading to bottom concentration values ranging from 54% to 25% of the boundary concentration value as the adsorption coefficient increases from 0 to 1.5 mL/g. Overall, consolidation exhibits greater sensitivity to parameter variations than solute transport in these cases.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"49 15","pages":"3509-3530"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nag.70030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contaminated geomaterials in CDFs (confined disposal facilities) and CCLs (compacted clay layers) typically undergo a long-term process involving coupled finite strain consolidation and solute transport, posing challenges for fully coupled modeling. To fill this research gap, a novel finite strain consolidation-solute transport model incorporating chemico-osmotic and creep effects is developed. The predictive accuracy of the model is verified through comparisons with existing analytical and numerical solute transport models with consolidation effect, a finite-strain consolidation model, and a small-strain HMC (hydro-mechanical-chemo) model. The model effectively replicates oedometer tests with one-step and three-step salinization, revealing significant volume changes (15.6% and 5.74% for two tests) due to chemical loading, even larger than those (5.31% and 5.13%) due to mechanical loading. Finally, parametric studies highlight the influence of creep, compressibility, boundary conditions, initial concentration distribution, and adsorption, demonstrating that chemico-osmotic effects can generate large negative pore pressures (50% of initial pore pressure) and average consolidation degree (about 140%). Compared with consolidation-related parameters, the adsorption coefficient has a more noticeable effect on solute transport, leading to bottom concentration values ranging from 54% to 25% of the boundary concentration value as the adsorption coefficient increases from 0 to 1.5 mL/g. Overall, consolidation exhibits greater sensitivity to parameter variations than solute transport in these cases.

考虑化学渗透和蠕变变形的粘性土大应变固结和溶质运移的新数值模型
在密闭处置设施(CDFs)和压实粘土层(ccl)中,受污染的岩土材料通常经历一个涉及有限应变固结和溶质运移的长期耦合过程,这对完全耦合建模提出了挑战。为了填补这一研究空白,提出了一种新的有限应变固结-溶质输运模型,该模型结合了化学-渗透和蠕变效应。通过与现有的具有固结效应的解析和数值溶质输运模型、有限应变固结模型和小应变HMC(水力-机械-化学)模型的比较,验证了该模型的预测准确性。该模型有效地重复了一步和三步盐渍化的里程表试验,揭示了化学负荷导致的显著体积变化(15.6%和5.74%),甚至大于机械负荷导致的体积变化(5.31%和5.13%)。最后,参数化研究强调了蠕变、可压缩性、边界条件、初始浓度分布和吸附的影响,表明化学渗透效应可以产生较大的负孔隙压力(初始孔隙压力的50%)和平均固结度(约140%)。与固结相关参数相比,吸附系数对溶质迁移的影响更为显著,当吸附系数从0 ~ 1.5 mL/g增加时,底部浓度值为边界浓度值的54% ~ 25%。总的来说,在这些情况下,固结比溶质迁移对参数变化更敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信