{"title":"Mortality prediction in geriatric patients with multiple trauma presenting by ambulance.","authors":"Aynur Yurtseven, Afşin Emre Kayıpmaz","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2025.42574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Modified 5-Factor Frailty Index (mFI-5) has been shown to predict complications following treatment in geriatric patients. However, few studies have compared the mFI-5 with other trauma scoring systems in cases involving multiple injuries. This study aimed to evaluate the Relationship Between mFI-5, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS) and their association with mortality in geriatric trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 65 and older who were admitted to the emergency trauma unit of a tertiary care hospital. Data collected included laboratory parameters, imaging results, blood transfusion requirements, hospitalization status, intensive care unit admission, surgical intervention, ISS, GTOS, mFI-5 scores, and mortality outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 241 patients were included, with a mean age of 78.12 (±8.34) years. Falls were the most common cause of trauma (n=142, 58.9%). Thoracic injuries were the most frequently observed (n=86, 53.7%). Patients who died within the first 24 hours of admission had significantly higher ISS (14.1 vs. 26.33), GTOS (119.02 vs. 157.33), and mFI-5 (2.53 vs. 3.33) scores (p=0.001, p=0.001, and p=0.017, respectively). Similar trends were noted for one-month and three-month mortality (p=0.001 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Scoring systems are essential for early mortality prediction in geriatric trauma patients. ISS, GTOS, and mFI-5 scores have shown similar effectiveness in predicting comorbidities, intensive care unit admission, and mortality in geriatric trauma patients. ISS involves a complex calculation, while GTOS, although specifically designed for geriatric patients, requires additional computations based on the ISS. In contrast, mFI-5 may be more practical in emergency settings because it is easy to calculate.</p>","PeriodicalId":94263,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","volume":"31 8","pages":"739-746"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12363138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2025.42574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The Modified 5-Factor Frailty Index (mFI-5) has been shown to predict complications following treatment in geriatric patients. However, few studies have compared the mFI-5 with other trauma scoring systems in cases involving multiple injuries. This study aimed to evaluate the Relationship Between mFI-5, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS) and their association with mortality in geriatric trauma patients.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 65 and older who were admitted to the emergency trauma unit of a tertiary care hospital. Data collected included laboratory parameters, imaging results, blood transfusion requirements, hospitalization status, intensive care unit admission, surgical intervention, ISS, GTOS, mFI-5 scores, and mortality outcomes.
Results: A total of 241 patients were included, with a mean age of 78.12 (±8.34) years. Falls were the most common cause of trauma (n=142, 58.9%). Thoracic injuries were the most frequently observed (n=86, 53.7%). Patients who died within the first 24 hours of admission had significantly higher ISS (14.1 vs. 26.33), GTOS (119.02 vs. 157.33), and mFI-5 (2.53 vs. 3.33) scores (p=0.001, p=0.001, and p=0.017, respectively). Similar trends were noted for one-month and three-month mortality (p=0.001 for all).
Conclusion: Scoring systems are essential for early mortality prediction in geriatric trauma patients. ISS, GTOS, and mFI-5 scores have shown similar effectiveness in predicting comorbidities, intensive care unit admission, and mortality in geriatric trauma patients. ISS involves a complex calculation, while GTOS, although specifically designed for geriatric patients, requires additional computations based on the ISS. In contrast, mFI-5 may be more practical in emergency settings because it is easy to calculate.
背景:改进的5因子衰弱指数(mFI-5)已被证明可以预测老年患者治疗后的并发症。然而,很少有研究将mFI-5与其他创伤评分系统在涉及多重损伤的病例中进行比较。本研究旨在评估mFI-5、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和老年创伤结局评分(GTOS)之间的关系及其与老年创伤患者死亡率的关系。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了一家三级医院急诊创伤科收治的65岁及以上患者。收集的数据包括实验室参数、影像学结果、输血要求、住院情况、重症监护病房入院情况、手术干预、ISS、GTOS、mFI-5评分和死亡率结局。结果:共纳入241例患者,平均年龄78.12(±8.34)岁。跌倒是最常见的创伤原因(n=142, 58.9%)。胸部损伤最为常见(n=86, 53.7%)。入院前24小时内死亡的患者ISS (14.1 vs. 26.33)、GTOS (119.02 vs. 157.33)和mFI-5评分(2.53 vs. 3.33)均显著较高(p=0.001、p=0.001和p=0.017)。1个月和3个月的死亡率也有类似的趋势(p=0.001)。结论:评分系统对老年创伤患者的早期死亡率预测至关重要。ISS、GTOS和mFI-5评分在预测老年创伤患者的合并症、重症监护病房入院和死亡率方面显示出相似的有效性。ISS涉及复杂的计算,而GTOS虽然是专门为老年患者设计的,但需要基于ISS进行额外的计算。相比之下,mFI-5在紧急情况下可能更实用,因为它易于计算。