Can the mind perception of perceived artificial intelligence-generated content alleviate involution anxiety? A longitudinal study with social support as a mediator.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Zehang Xie
{"title":"Can the mind perception of perceived artificial intelligence-generated content alleviate involution anxiety? A longitudinal study with social support as a mediator.","authors":"Zehang Xie","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2025.2543906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Involution anxiety, characterized by heightened stress and competition in educational and professional settings, is a significant psychological trait in contemporary society. However, under the backdrop of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content (AIGC), this issue has not been extensively discussed. Building on mind perception theory and social support theory, this research collected 1126 valid surveys and conducted a longitudinal study over two waves within two interaction scenarios - virtual companionship and knowledge acquisition. This study investigates whether the mind perception of perceived AIGC can alleviate involution anxiety, with social support as a mediating variable. Results from cross-lagged panel analysis revealed that in the virtual companionship scenario, mind perception significantly reduced involution anxiety over time (<i>β</i> from -0.205 to -0.221, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and positively predicted perceived social support (<i>β</i> from 0.297 to 0.323, <i>p</i> < 0.001), which also negatively predicted involution anxiety (<i>β</i> from -0.346 to -0.390, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In contrast, in the knowledge acquisition scenario, mind perception unexpectedly increased involution anxiety (<i>β</i> from 0.190 to 0.218, <i>p</i> < 0.05), and its association with social support was non-significant. However, social support still showed a negative association with involution anxiety (<i>β</i> from -0.243 to -0.276, <i>p</i> < 0.001). These findings suggest that AIGC's impact on involution anxiety is complex and scenario-dependent, emphasizing the importance of context in the integration of AI technologies into human social dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2543906","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Involution anxiety, characterized by heightened stress and competition in educational and professional settings, is a significant psychological trait in contemporary society. However, under the backdrop of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content (AIGC), this issue has not been extensively discussed. Building on mind perception theory and social support theory, this research collected 1126 valid surveys and conducted a longitudinal study over two waves within two interaction scenarios - virtual companionship and knowledge acquisition. This study investigates whether the mind perception of perceived AIGC can alleviate involution anxiety, with social support as a mediating variable. Results from cross-lagged panel analysis revealed that in the virtual companionship scenario, mind perception significantly reduced involution anxiety over time (β from -0.205 to -0.221, p < 0.001) and positively predicted perceived social support (β from 0.297 to 0.323, p < 0.001), which also negatively predicted involution anxiety (β from -0.346 to -0.390, p < 0.001). In contrast, in the knowledge acquisition scenario, mind perception unexpectedly increased involution anxiety (β from 0.190 to 0.218, p < 0.05), and its association with social support was non-significant. However, social support still showed a negative association with involution anxiety (β from -0.243 to -0.276, p < 0.001). These findings suggest that AIGC's impact on involution anxiety is complex and scenario-dependent, emphasizing the importance of context in the integration of AI technologies into human social dynamics.

感知人工智能生成内容的心灵感知能否缓解内化焦虑?以社会支持为中介的纵向研究。
内化焦虑是当代社会的一个重要心理特征,其特征是教育和职业环境中的压力和竞争加剧。然而,在人工智能生成内容(AIGC)的背景下,这个问题并没有得到广泛的讨论。本研究在心理感知理论和社会支持理论的基础上,收集了1126份有效问卷,在虚拟陪伴和知识获取两种互动场景下进行了两波纵向研究。本研究以社会支持为中介变量,探讨被感知的AIGC心理知觉是否能缓解内联焦虑。交叉滞后面板分析结果显示,在虚拟陪伴场景中,随着时间的推移,心理知觉显著降低了内化焦虑(β从-0.205到-0.221,p β从0.297到0.323,p β从-0.346到-0.390,p β从0.190到0.218,p β从-0.243到-0.276,p β从-0.243到-0.276,p β从- 0.240到- 0.240)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychology Health & Medicine
Psychology Health & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management. For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信